Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Demonstrations that the 3-days-of-darkness is actually part of Divine Revelation  (Read 1756 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline rowenwdse

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
  • Reputation: +24/-6
  • Gender: Male
Dear All,

I would like to share a 4 page PDF I wrote demonstrating that the 3-days-of-darkness is actually part of Divine Revelation.

Please Click this Link: https://mothermary.website/The-times-we-are-living-in.pdf

And also Please Click this Link: https://mothermary.website/june-13-2029.html

I want to say that I will mail 3-days-of-darkness candles – that I had blessed by a priest on Candlemas day – the highest blessing a candle can get in the Catholic Church – absolutely for free. I only ask for $7 for shipping – that are available now.

Note: It is my personal opinion that the 3- days-of-darkness is not mere private revelation, but Divine Revelation for the reason that it is in the Gospel of Saint Matthew in Chapter 24 - Verse 29.

Thanks and Kind Regards in +Jesus, Mary and Joseph,
Roger


Offline Marulus Fidelis

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
  • Reputation: +295/-83
  • Gender: Male
The three days of darkness, great monarch and related theories are a demonic deception.



Offline Marulus Fidelis

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
  • Reputation: +295/-83
  • Gender: Male
Considering that you call Pope Pius IX of happy memory Blessed indicates you are Novus Ordo.

The Vatican II sect is an even bigger deception than the three days of darkness. It's not the Catholic Church but the prophesied end-times counter-church, the whore of Babylon.



This video has some great points on that topic.

Also, see why Vatican II is a new religion here:



Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 3489
  • Reputation: +2008/-447
  • Gender: Male
I would like to share a 4 page PDF I wrote demonstrating that the 3-days-of-darkness is actually part of Divine Revelation.
.


:facepalm:

Offline MiracleOfTheSun

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 571
  • Reputation: +222/-133
  • Gender: Male
I wasn't familiar with the 100 year warning found in Genesis.  Interesting.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 41932
  • Reputation: +23959/-4345
  • Gender: Male
The three days of darkness, great monarch and related theories are a demonic deception.



I listened to the first minute, but he really should not have conflated Garabandal (a diabolical deception) with the other 3 credible Catholic sources.  It's very dishonest to blend all those together.

And we certainly can't have an "optimistic" view of the future, an we now?  :laugh1:

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 41932
  • Reputation: +23959/-4345
  • Gender: Male
I listened to the first minute, but he really should not have conflated Garabandal (a diabolical deception) with the other 3 credible Catholic sources.  It's very dishonest to blend all those together.

And we certainly can't have an "optimistic" view of the future, an we now?  :laugh1:

That video is a horrible mess, a disaster.  Legitimate Catholic sources for the 3 Days of Darkness stand, including Anna Maria Taigi and Marie Julie Jahenny.  He dismisses Taigi as "possibly" speaking of a metaphorical 3 days of darkness (but that to me seems unlikely) or possibly mistaken, and then does a dishonest hatchet-/smear- job on Jahenny (conflating things some blogger wrote about her with her actual words, and making absurd false accusations against her).  I've long said that 90% of the stuff attributed to Padre Pio is likely fake, and have long dismissed Garabandal as a diabolical fraud (source of the Illumination of Conscience and Great Warning fake prophecies), but amidst all this guy's chaff and nonsense, the credibility of the 3 Days' of Darkness stands.  Is it certain?  No.  But it also cannot be ruled out.  Naturally speaking, SOMEthing like that has to happen since the wicked are in total control of the world.  In any case, that was weak.

I haven't gotten to the Great Monarch stuff yet, but there's a long tradition of Great Monarch prophecy.

This guy seems to be just a Dimond-head (even imitating their style of delivering videos) attempting to justify the Dimond position that JP2 was THE Antichrist (which, IMO, borders on the absurd) and that Bergoglio is "Peter the Roman" and that the world will end after him.

Offline SimpleMan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4388
  • Reputation: +1631/-194
  • Gender: Male

This guy seems to be just a Dimond-head (even imitating their style of delivering videos) attempting to justify the Dimond position that JP2 was THE Antichrist (which, IMO, borders on the absurd) and that Bergoglio is "Peter the Roman" and that the world will end after him.


"Dimond-head" --- that's a good one!

That said, their video Creation and Miracles is excellent, and Michael comes across as very eloquent and intelligent, but not in an overbearing way.  Kind of reminded me of Ron Howard in young adulthood.

Not a fan of the Dimonds, just giving credit where credit is due.


Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 9605
  • Reputation: +6271/-940
  • Gender: Male
Note: It is my personal opinion that the 3- days-of-darkness is not mere private revelation, but Divine Revelation for the reason that it is in the Gospel of Saint Matthew in Chapter 24 - Verse 29.

I think your personal opinion is wrong.

Matthew Chapter 24, including verse 29, regards the Second Coming.  Do you postulate 3 days of Darkness, immediately "and then" followed by the Second Coming? Such a premise begs credulity.

Quote
29 And immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of heaven shall be moved  30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all tribes of the earth mourn: and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with much power and majesty  [Matthew 24:29-30] 


Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 9605
  • Reputation: +6271/-940
  • Gender: Male
…dismissed Garabandal as a diabolical fraud (source of the Illumination of Conscience and Great Warning fake prophecies)…

Agree. It is indeed a diabolical temptation to hope for an unmistakeable "warning." As if we haven't been warned since we reached the age of reason??? The whole idea opposes the truth —> we all need to straighten up immediately, not be lulled into the complacency bred by a promise of a "warning."

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31209
  • Reputation: +27126/-495
  • Gender: Male
I was taught that the Three Days of Darkness, on the Theological Grades of Certainty scale, is somewhere around "pious opinion" or "tolerated opinion" -- the lowest level there is.

So "part of Divine Revelation"? Ahhh, no.


The Theological Grades of Certainty
- "Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma"
by Ludwig Ott.

1. The highest degree of certainty appertains to the immediately revealed truths. The belief due to them is based on the authority of God Revealing (fides divina), and if the Church, through its teaching, vouches for the fact it a truth is contained in Revelation, one's certainty is then also based on the authority of the Infallible Teaching Authority of the Church (fides catholica). If Truths are defined by a solemn judgment of faith (definition) of the Pope or of a General Council, they are "de fide definita."
2. Catholic truths or Church doctrines, on which the infallible Teaching Authority of the Church has finally decided, are to be accepted with a faith which is based on the sole authority of the Church (fides ecclesiastica). These truths are as infallibly certain as dogmas proper.
3. A Teaching proximate to Faith (sententia fidei proxima) is a doctrine, which is regarded by theologians generally as a truth of Revelation, but which has not yet been finally promulgated as such by the Church.
4. A Teaching pertaining to the Faith, i.e., theologically certain (sententia ad fidem pertinens, i.e., theologice certa) is a doctrine, on which the Teaching Authority of the Church has not yet finally pronounced, but whose truth is guaranteed by its intrinsic connection with the doctrine of revelation (theological conclusions).
5. Common Teaching (sententia communis) is doctrine, which in itself belongs to the field of free opinions, but which is accepted by theologians generally.
6. Theological opinions of lesser grades of certainty are called probable, more probable, well-founded (sententia probabilis, probabilior, bene fundata). Those which are regarded as being in agreement with the consciousness of Faith of the Church are called pious opinions (sententia pia). The least degree of certainty is possessed by the tolerated opinion (opinio tolerata), which is only weakly founded, but which is tolerated by the Church.

Want to say "thank you"? 
You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31209
  • Reputation: +27126/-495
  • Gender: Male
The Three Days of Darkness is cousins with the Rapture. They both have the same traits: the Faithful will be protected by God, whisked away to escape the temporary earthly sufferings resulting from His judgment on the world.

Here's a summary (see the similarities?)

The Three Days of Darkness (Catholic version) says:
the Faithful will be safe and cozy in their houses while the devils wreak havoc in the world outside.

The Rapture (Protestant version) says:
the Faithful will be safe and cozy in Heaven while the devils wreak havoc in the world outside.

I'm not saying which one copied which one, but I refuse to believe these two ideas were independently developed TWICE. Someone copied someone.

But here's the problem -- THAT'S NOT HOW GOD WORKS. If you read your Scripture, your Church History, that is NOT God's way. Sufferings in this life are purifying, temporary, and God's greatest gift (the Cross). The good suffering with the bad is fine, because it works for their salvation, even while it punishes the wicked and accomplishes His justice.

Please, if your opinion differs from mine (not a crime), show me how I'm wrong. Show me all the times God has gone out of his way to spare the Elect from a chastisement or other earthly suffering on a grand scale. World War 1? World War 2? Vatican II? The Black Death? The French Revolution? The Russian Revolution? Countless wars throughout history?

And I'll anticipate your ONE comeback right now -- yes, God DOES protect *individuals* here and there, like the small rectory that survived the nuclear bomb at Nagasaki. God takes care of His own. But "taking care of them" doesn't always mean preventing their suffering and/or death. Death of the body is not the worst evil, for those destined for Eternal Life. Remember, God isn't overpowered by emotion. St. Paul said "For to me, to live is Christ; and to die is gain." (Phil. 1:21)
Want to say "thank you"? 
You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

Offline St Giles

  • Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 841
  • Reputation: +379/-64
  • Gender: Male
Would the Passover be of any comparison, Matthew?
"Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect."
"Seek first the kingdom of Heaven..."
"Every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment"

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 41932
  • Reputation: +23959/-4345
  • Gender: Male
Agree. It is indeed a diabolical temptation to hope for an unmistakeable "warning." As if we haven't been warned since we reached the age of reason??? The whole idea opposes the truth —> we all need to straighten up immediately, not be lulled into the complacency bred by a promise of a "warning."

Yeah, the "warning" and "illumination of consciences" are exclusively from Garabandal ... which most serious Catholics have dismissed as a diabolical fraud.  Certainly there were preternatural phenomena there, so I don't think it was just a hoax, but actual diabolical activity.  Last I heard, Bishop Williamson believes in Garabandal still.  Several of their predictions/prophecies have been epic failures, so I can't understand why that alone wouldn't disqualify Garabandal from any credibility.

Online ElwinRansom1970

  • Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 754
  • Reputation: +508/-94
  • Gender: Male
  • γνῶθι σεαυτόν - temet nosce
This guy seems to be just a Dimond-head
Is that a species of rattlesnake? 🤣
"I distrust every idea that does not seem obsolete and grotesque to my contemporaries."
Nicolás Gómez Dávila