Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Contra Cekadam: A response by Fr Cekada  (Read 23195 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Contra Cekadam: A response by Fr Cekada
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2018, 03:09:53 AM »
No, it is most certainly not that simple.  I love how you think that claiming something and adding "It's that simple" somehow makes your assertion true and proven.

cuм ex actually stated the exact opposite of what you're saying.
In the meantime the reputed website catholic-hierarchy.org states of Archbishop Marcel  François Lefebvre that he "left the Church"

Online Stubborn

  • Supporter
Re: Contra Cekadam: A response by Fr Cekada
« Reply #11 on: June 14, 2018, 04:57:12 AM »
No, it is most certainly not that simple.  I love how you think that claiming something and adding "It's that simple" somehow makes your assertion true and proven.

cuм ex actually stated the exact opposite of what you're saying.

The problem with cuм ex is, if everything it says pertaining to lost offices is in fact still in force or is divine law as the sedes believe, then there has been no Catholic  Church on earth for the last 60 years for certain, more likely the last 400 or 500 years - at least.


Quote
cuм ex:
Anysoever who, before this date [or shall in the future], have been detected to have deviated from the Catholic Faith.....

If cuм ex is in fact the law, then it absolutely applies to +ABL who signed the docuмents and said the NOM, to "The Nine" who all studied NO theology at NO universities, to +Thuc and all V2 attendees, to everyone who has ever spoken with a NO priest or went to a NOM. They all lost their offices. This doesn't even begin to scratch the surface.

Where does it end? Where does it start?  According to cuм ex, it can be argued that St. Paul was an invalid Apostle since "before this date", he not only deviated from the Catholic faith, he persecuted those who held it.



Re: Contra Cekadam: A response by Fr Cekada
« Reply #12 on: June 14, 2018, 06:45:29 AM »
Since these apostates hold the offices in reality and publicly, then until they are removed PUBLICLY, they still hold the office.  It’s that simple.

And who do you suppose is going to "remove" them publicly? The apostate (mason) they themselves have maneuvered to place in the Papal Office?

Re: Contra Cekadam: A response by Fr Cekada
« Reply #13 on: June 14, 2018, 08:07:00 AM »
And who do you suppose is going to "remove" them publicly? The apostate (mason) they themselves have maneuvered to place in the Papal Office?
Cantarella,

Where that image of Our Blessed Mother from?

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Contra Cekadam: A response by Fr Cekada
« Reply #14 on: June 14, 2018, 09:25:31 AM »
Obviously there is debate on what cuм Ex means.

Obviously, and that was precisely my point.  It's not just "that simple" that the See is still occupied.