Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Consecration LiveStream  (Read 3484 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tradman

  • Supporter
Re: Consecration LiveStream
« Reply #35 on: March 26, 2022, 10:30:08 PM »
I can't imagine that the extras added to the Consecration, specifically to the glory of Mary (to include humanity, etc.) was a bad thing.  Mary did not dictate the text of the Consecration. Nor did She specifically request nothing else be added. It was an unusually holy moment that spanned the entire world. Maybe Francis is having a St. Peter conversion? Or he is just an egomaniac that hopes to recover some of his reputation?  Ok, wishful thinking. The only other thing I can figure is that God loves to confound everyone, even the most faithful Catholics. I know it isn't the popular position here, but I'm excited and hopeful and even if we undergo a chastisement for previous and current evils, (destruction of the economy so we can be humbled?) perhaps we get a lesser punishment than we expect.      

Fr. Couture, SSPX, makes a good point that the consecration of a nation is "a practical rejection of the doctrine of religious liberty" (30:52):


Re: Consecration LiveStream
« Reply #37 on: March 28, 2022, 07:54:44 PM »
I hold the same interpretation as Pax on the St. Malachy prophesy.

I also have a hypothesis about what happens after.

In the Apocolypse, ch14, vs 6, Three angels make various declarations. The last angel warns against taking the mark of the beast.

In the first few chapters of Revelation, the bishops of the seven churches are referred to as angels. I think the third angel is Peter the Roman condemning the mark in the last days of his papacy. Since all three declarations are like ultimatums, they are all probably in the decline of the period of peace.

We also have the prophecy of Don Bosco about two popes who rally the Church to a decisive victory at the end of the world, and the prophecies that reference the angelic pastor who will work with the great monarch. There is probably some overlap amongst the various sources, but there should be at least three after the 5th age.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Fr. Couture, SSPX, makes a good point that the consecration of a nation is "a practical rejection of the doctrine of religious liberty" (30:52):

Of course it is.  That's not some kind of revelation.  Consequently, since Bergoglio's intention was to solicit the exact opposite, freedom and peace for the practice of all religions and a syncretistic harmony among all mankind, the SSPX was behooven and obliged to call this thing out for what it was instead of playing along and misleading the faithful that this was in keeping with Our Blessed Mother's request. Maybe Father Couture has a response to that?

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Consecration LiveStream
« Reply #39 on: March 28, 2022, 08:29:00 PM »
I can't imagine that the extras added to the Consecration, specifically to the glory of Mary (to include humanity, etc.) was a bad thing.  Mary did not dictate the text of the Consecration. Nor did She specifically request nothing else be added. It was an unusually holy moment that spanned the entire world. Maybe Francis is having a St. Peter conversion? Or he is just an egomaniac that hopes to recover some of his reputation?  Ok, wishful thinking. The only other thing I can figure is that God loves to confound everyone, even the most faithful Catholics. I know it isn't the popular position here, but I'm excited and hopeful and even if we undergo a chastisement for previous and current evils, (destruction of the economy so we can be humbled?) perhaps we get a lesser punishment than we expect.     

Please tell me you're kidding.  Bergoglio expressed in his formula the exact opposite of what Our Lady requested.  Please read Father Girouard's analysis.  There wasn't a single mention of reparation for the sins and blasphemies of mankind against the Immaculate Heart of Mary.