Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX: A Spectacular Reading from the Pulpit  (Read 5098 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SSPX: A Spectacular Reading from the Pulpit
« Reply #35 on: March 26, 2012, 04:18:35 PM »
Quote from: Caminus
1. What do you think "reconcile" means?


Rome should be reconciling with Tradition before the Society reconciles with them.

Quote
2. Do you think ABL literally thought Rome was synonymous with Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ or do you think that ABL was using the term in a figurative sense pertaining the the underlying causes of the destruction of the Faith?


Well, Rome was infiltrated by Freemasons, and the theology of Vatican II is basically Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ. Of course Rome itself is not Freemasonic, but it was infiltrated by Masons. I hope that makes sense; I can clarify if need-be.

SSPX: A Spectacular Reading from the Pulpit
« Reply #36 on: March 26, 2012, 04:31:12 PM »
Quote from: Seraphim
PS: I see Caminus is lighting up the board with more posts.  I have him on ignore, so I can't read them, but I can pretty much guess what they say anyway: The same thing as his last 20 posts on this issue?  Someone let me know if I am right :roll-laugh2:


That's too bad. Discussion on this is good, and has been fruitful, and I think you both make good points. I hope you reconsider.

SpiritusSanctus isn't making any sense (logically speaking) and seems to bee too eager to just argue with him.



SSPX: A Spectacular Reading from the Pulpit
« Reply #37 on: March 26, 2012, 09:07:48 PM »
Quote from: s2srea
SpiritusSanctus isn't making any sense (logically speaking) and seems to bee too eager to just argue with him.


How so? My point is that Archbishop LeFebvre would not have approved of any "reconciliation" unless Rome converted first. If you want to put your trust in someone who has shown his stance is much different from ABL, go ahead. That's up to you. But to do so is what doesn't make sense.