Author Topic: Cloaks and Daggers - II (Read 15795 times)

insidebaseball · « **Reply #90 on:** March 25, 2012, 03:17:23 PM »

Elizabeth, why do you keep stiring the pot. You have ironically become the biggest source of advertising for the silly websites. Pray for your enemies to receive the outcome you desire.

Lighthouse · « **Reply #91 on:** March 25, 2012, 03:26:57 PM »

I most humbly beg all of your pardons. The name I was trying to pull out of my aging memory system was Fr. Thielen--NOT Fr. Jenkins.

It's very confusing. Please excuse my making it worse. I am aware that Fr. Jenkins was not on the staff at SAG! But Fr. Thielen was for a short period of time.

I still do have the same questions regarding Fr. Thielen's role in this.

SJB · « **Reply #92 on:** March 25, 2012, 04:26:24 PM »

Quote from: Cupertino

Quote from: Elizabeth
Thanks for the vulgar priestly imagery, SJB

I know, Elizabeth, you are being sarcastic about SJB's comment.

I will put it more bluntly: DIS-GUST-ING, and impious.

Apparently insidebaseball has no objection. So sorry for him.

It is a term for "a confrontational debate; a contest of wills or egos"

You should be asking why this has been going on for decades now. The fact that two priests are involved is the scandal, not a term that describes the situation.

insidebaseball · « **Reply #93 on:** March 25, 2012, 05:16:52 PM »

I thought this tread was dead. Forgive me.

SJB · « **Reply #94 on:** March 25, 2012, 06:07:59 PM »

Quote from: Cupertino

C'mon, insidebaseball! You mean you have no problem talking to your wife, mother-in-law, daughters about a traditional priest having a "pissing match"? C'mon, you know you would be horrified to do so. Why no objection here on this forum? Do you know the moral teaching about being complicit in another's sin by silence?

The fighting between SGG and IC has scandalized many for decades now, and in typical Bazz fashion, you focus on a few words that accurately describe the situation.