You're just being ridiculous. If you think the NO is a Catholic Rite, you're wrong, NO miracles do not change that and should stop going to the NO. Oh wait, you go to SSPX for some reason - what is that reason?
You clearly don’t understand what is meant by the term “Catholic rite,” which is nothing more that worship approved for use in the Church.
Look it up in the CE.
You seem to want to give it an additional, broader, more qualitative meaning.
Your first error leads to a second one: That those who accept the NOM as Catholic are in contradiction if they object to the NOM (when in reality, a proper understanding of the term “Catholic rite” doesn’t hinder us in the least from accepting, for example, all the objections in the Ottaviani Intervention).
Here’s the proof that you (and others) have not properly understood the term “Catholic rite:”
In Apologia Pro Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies quotes Lefebvre as acknowledging -in 1980- that one can satisfy their Sunday obligation at the NOM.
But that’s impossible, if the NOM isn’t a Catholic rite, properly understood.
So either Lefebvre didn’t know what a Catholic rite was, or you are wrong.
Which do you find more likely?