Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Benedict XVI dead at 95  (Read 20936 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 14682
  • Reputation: +6046/-904
  • Gender: Male
Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
« Reply #390 on: January 10, 2023, 07:34:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is what I mean:

    Here's the entry on "anathema" from a Catholic dictionary I posted a link to in the Library forum:
    Yes, I've heard a few different definitions of anathema, personally I always preferred to it to mean "cursed" or "accursed" - that's just me. But by any definition, to me before anything else, anathema means "I must avoid" and that whoever dies in that state goes to hell, and I avoid so as not to join them in hell.

    And yes, of course re your inserted quote, the Church has always anathematized both, moral offenses or because they persist in heresy, as your quote states. And those guilty of either are excluded from her communion, as your quote states - and they will go to hell if they die in that state - as your quote states. Note that both, moral offenses and heresy are mortal sins. So one can be separated from communion if they're not a heretic just the same as if one is a heretic.
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46413
    • Reputation: +27323/-5045
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #391 on: January 10, 2023, 07:34:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It doesn't say much for your advanced theological skills of finding truth when a total dumbell like me can find it.

    Never, not once, not ever, did I EVER assert "that the Sacrament of Baptism sufficed for membership in the Church."
    If you found one theologian who said that, he's wrong, but if you actually did look, you would've found a lot more than only one.

    All this is to say you have no clue what my (Catholic) ecclesiology is.

    You're either lying or so ignorant / stupid that you didn't even understand what you were saying (either one is possible).  You have regularly argued that Baptism suffices for membership in the Church, citing Father Wathen (your rule of faith) along those lines.  We've spent countless threads arguing about it, where you even tried to explain away Pope Pius XII as saying the opposite of what he actually taught, namely, that heresy and schism sever membership in the Catholic Church.

    If I had the time, I would find all your nonsense with the CI search engine, but you have been making this absurd claim for YEARS now.

    Not to mention that you contradict yourself in this idiotic post.  First you deny that you ever said that Baptism sufficed for membership, but then you claim that there are many theologians who hold this opinion (that you now claim you don't hold).  No, there was exactly one theologian, and Msgr. Fenton named his name and explained that his position died with him.

    Your other stupidity is the argument that the Magisterium is inerrant, but then you claim that any errors taught by the Pope are simply not "Magisterium".  So if the Pope teaches and it happens to be true, then it's Magisterium, but if a Pope teaches something erroneous, then it's not Magisterium.  So you defined Magisterium as the true things that a Pope happens to teach in his official teaching capacity, a definition that absolutely no one holds.

    Really, your nonsense is mind-numbing, and it's astonishing that anyone takes your idiocy seriously.


    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14682
    • Reputation: +6046/-904
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #392 on: January 10, 2023, 07:36:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You're either lying or so ignorant / stupid that you didn't even understand what you were saying (either one is possible).  You have regularly argued that Baptism suffices for membership in the Church, citing Father Wathen (your rule of faith) along those lines.  We've spent countless threads arguing about it, where you even tried to explain away Pope Pius XII as saying the opposite of what he actually taught, namely, that heresy and schism sever membership in the Catholic Church.

    If I had the time, I would find all your nonsense with the CI search engine, but you have been making this absurd claim for YEARS now.

    Not to mention that you contradict yourself in this idiotic post.  First you deny that you ever said that Baptism sufficed for membership, but then you claim that there are many theologians who hold this opinion (that you now claim you don't hold).  No, there was exactly one theologian, and Msgr. Fenton named his name and explained that his position died with him.
    You have next to zero reading comprehension.

    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46413
    • Reputation: +27323/-5045
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #393 on: January 10, 2023, 07:38:39 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • You have next to zero reading comprehension.

    I try not to read your posts, because every time I do, I feel dumber just for having read them.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14682
    • Reputation: +6046/-904
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #394 on: January 10, 2023, 07:41:49 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Never mind
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46413
    • Reputation: +27323/-5045
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #395 on: January 10, 2023, 07:48:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • augustinees cited the Canonist Morato on another thread:

    Quote
    Heretics and schismatics are barred from the Supreme Pontificate by the divine law itself, because, although by divine law they are not considered incapable of participating in certain types of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, nevertheless, they must certainly be regarded as excluded from occupying the throne of the Apostolic See…

    Let m guess, another 19th/20th century theologian, right?

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14682
    • Reputation: +6046/-904
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #396 on: January 10, 2023, 07:50:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • augustinees cited the Canonist Morato on another thread:

    Let m guess, another 19th/20th century theologian, right?
    Yep, from 1921 far as I can tell from some obscure nobody named Morato. 
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46413
    • Reputation: +27323/-5045
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #397 on: January 10, 2023, 07:54:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You spent nearly the entirety of this thread here arguing that heretics are members of the Church.
    https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/bergolio-says-there-many-restorers-in-usa-who-do-not-accept-vatican-ii/msg830346/#msg830346


    Offline DecemRationis

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2312
    • Reputation: +867/-144
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #398 on: January 10, 2023, 07:57:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Your other stupidity is the argument that the Magisterium is inerrant, but then you claim that any errors taught by the Pope are simply not "Magisterium".  So if the Pope teaches and it happens to be true, then it's Magisterium, but if a Pope teaches something erroneous, then it's not Magisterium.  So you defined Magisterium as the true things that a Pope happens to teach in his official teaching capacity, a definition that absolutely no one holds.



    But the Sede argument is the pope is not the pope because he's a heretic and a heretic can't be pope; it's a circular argument too. Or, in other words, he's pope if he teaches inerrantly but not pope if he doesn't. It's the same deal. 

    There's a rai·son d'ê·tre for the Magisterium and the pope. In the words of the theologians who created the Draft Dogmatic Constitution of the Church to be used at Vatican I, which dissolved before all of the items in the draft could be addressed:


    Quote
    We declare, moreover, that, whether one considers its existence or its constitution, the Church of Christ is an everlasting and indefectible society, and that, after it, no more complete nor more perfect economy of salvation is to be hoped for in this world. For, to the very end of the world the pilgrims of this earth are to be saved through Christ. Consequently, his Church, the only society of salvation, will last until the end of the world ever unchangeable and unchanged in its constitution. Therefore, although the Church is growing—and We wish that it may always grow in faith and charity for the upbuilding of Christ's body—although it evolves in a variety of ways according to the changing times and circuмstances in which it is constantly displaying activity, nevertheless, it remains unchangeable in itself and in the constitution it received from Christ. Therefore, Christ's Church can never lose its properties and its qualities, its sacred teaching authority, priestly office, and governing body, so that through his visible body, Christ may always be the way, the truth, and the life for all men.


    Jesuit Fathers of St. Mary's College. The Church Teaches: Docuмents of the Church in English Translation . TAN Books. Kindle Edition.


    The Church was constituted to be a "city on the hill," a visible sign to mark where one could go to find what is necessary for salvation. When a point in time comes when a validly elected pope, with no visible rival or claim against posited, is selected, and the existing bishops of the Church and their successors accept that person as pope - the leaders of that visible city on the hill - becomes false or errant, the whole rai·son d'ê·tre for the pope's and the Magisterium's indefectiblity disappears: the visible sign doesn't lead to heaven but to hell. 

    Sedevacantism doesn't avoid the problem of indefectibilty, not if the purpose of the doctrine and the visible Church was to lead men to truth and eternal life . . . and that was its purpose. 



    Rom. 3:25 Whom God hath proposed to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to the shewing of his justice, for the remission of former sins" 

    Apoc 17:17 For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled.

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46413
    • Reputation: +27323/-5045
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #399 on: January 10, 2023, 07:58:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yep, from 1921 far as I can tell from some obscure nobody named Morato.

    :laugh1: :facepalm: Stubbon declares an approved and well educated Catholic Canonist to be "some obscure nobody".  Instead we should listen to Stubborn, that FAMOUS SOMEBODY.

    You're entitled to disagree, Stubborn, but not gratuitously, simply because you don't like what someone has to say.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14682
    • Reputation: +6046/-904
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #400 on: January 10, 2023, 08:03:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You spent nearly the entirety of this thread here arguing that heretics are members of the Church.
    https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/bergolio-says-there-many-restorers-in-usa-who-do-not-accept-vatican-ii/msg830346/#msg830346
    If the heretics were never Catholic, then they are not members. If they were Catholic and fell into the sin of heresy, then they are excluded from her communion (excommunicated). Should they want to repent and amend their lives, they can go to confession to be absolved - same as those who are excluded from her communion (excommunicated) for moral offenses, iow, same as all Catholics must do to be absolved from their mortal sins.

    I completely understand that this is offensive, even heretical to sedes since it does not fit the sede doctrine, in spite of that, there it is.
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14682
    • Reputation: +6046/-904
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #401 on: January 10, 2023, 08:05:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • :laugh1: :facepalm: Stubbon declares an approved and well educated Catholic Canonist to be "some obscure nobody".  Instead we should listen to Stubborn, that FAMOUS SOMEBODY.

    You're entitled to disagree, Stubborn, but not gratuitously, simply because you don't like what someone has to say.
    Nobody even ever heard of Marato. I would like to know how long or how many books he had to page through for Fr. Cekada to find someone who fit his narrative.
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46413
    • Reputation: +27323/-5045
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #402 on: January 10, 2023, 08:28:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Nobody even ever heard of Marato. I would like to know how long or how many books he had to page through for Fr. Cekada to find someone who fit his narrative.

    This is no "narrative" by Father Cekada.  As I said, you're entitled to disagree and basically hold the Cajetan / John of St. Thomas opinion, as Father Chazal does, but you're not entitled to pretend that the Bellarmine opinion is made up by "sedes", some kind of invented narrative.  There are many others beside Morato who say the same thing.  Part of the problem is, as Decem pointed out, your notion of "Divine Law" is distorted / confused.  God never issued a Canon Law.  What's meant by divine law is something that proceeds inherently from the way that God has designed the Church, by the very definitions of Catholic ecclesiology.  So, when St. Robert states that someone cannot be head of the Church who is not a member, that is considered to be a position from divine law, meaning, from the nature of the Church as constituted by God.

    Offline DecemRationis

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2312
    • Reputation: +867/-144
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #403 on: January 10, 2023, 08:38:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As I said, you're entitled to disagree and basically hold the Cajetan / John of St. Thomas opinion, as Father Chazal does, but you're not entitled to pretend that the Bellarmine opinion is made up by "sedes", some kind of invented narrative. 

    Lad,

    Father Kramer argues in his book that since the Vatican I council and its declaration of the injudicability of the pope by any authority on earth, and the codification of ipso facto loss of office for heresy in Canon 188 in 1917, the Cajetan/John of St. Thomas opinion is no longer tenable. I think he argues that all theologians post Vatican I and the 1917 code agree with him.

    What are your thoughts on that argument?

    DR
    Rom. 3:25 Whom God hath proposed to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to the shewing of his justice, for the remission of former sins" 

    Apoc 17:17 For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14682
    • Reputation: +6046/-904
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Benedict XVI dead at 95
    « Reply #404 on: January 10, 2023, 08:41:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is no "narrative" by Father Cekada.  As I said, you're entitled to disagree and basically hold the Cajetan / John of St. Thomas opinion, as Father Chazal does, but you're not entitled to pretend that the Bellarmine opinion is made up by "sedes", some kind of invented narrative.  There are many others beside Morato who say the same thing.  Part of the problem is, as Decem pointed out, your notion of "Divine Law" is distorted / confused.  God never issued a Canon Law.  What's meant by divine law is something that proceeds inherently from the way that God has designed the Church, by the very definitions of Catholic ecclesiology.  So, when St. Robert states that someone cannot be head of the Church who is not a member, that is considered to be a position from divine law, meaning, from the nature of the Church as constituted by God.
    I am not the one pretending anything - I've repeatedly said I don't care. What I care about is avoiding all things that could make me lose my greatest gift, my Catholic faith, which means I avoid all things NO, that's what I care about.

    Since there is no advantage to sedeism over R&R, why promote the idea?
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse