That's not what I said, for what it's worth.

I said give it a few days! Out of respect for the dead, if nothing else. For reasons of human decency, politeness, social mores, etc.

Then you can engage in controversy to oppose any currents or campaigns to canonize him.

Well, if it weren't for the Bennyvacantist nonsense, I probably would not have too much to say about Ratzinger, since he'd be largely irrelevant now.

But the praise of Ratzinger's theology and attempting to paint him as a Traditionalist simply cannot be left to stand.

It's not like I personally know Ratzinger's family.  He was a public person who did much damage in public to the Church and to Catholic doctrine ... while some continue to praise him as some great defender of the faith.

Waiting for days or weeks to reveal the the lifetime of heresy Ratzinger espoused and used his considerable power as head of the CDF and Papal Pretender to propagate, seems to destroy the opportunity to reach millions of those who only receive information from Opus Judei controlled outlets and others who are going full defense mode already.

Where is the Charity toward God or the souls of our neighbors if we stay silent while every NO conservative with any media presence or influence spins every possible narrative to pre-empt the truth about the late Ratzinger? News cycles move so fast that waiting too long simply means most people have stopped paying attention and caring, and return to their default position.

Bishop Joseph Pfeiffer on Ratzinger's death:

Well, for the most part he's not wrong ... except where he says Ratzinger was the Holy Father .  He didn't go into much detail about the actual heresies that Ratzinger himself taught and promoted that betray this idea that he was some kind of Traditionalist.  I agree with his assessment that the "friendliness" of Ratzinger toward Tradition was calculated to divide Traditional Catholics.  I also agree with him in both asking for God to have mercy on his soul and yet calling out his legacy of evil.  Is it possible that right now, evoking some of the images from his talk, Ratzinger is asking God to have +Lefebvre dip his finger in the water to bring him some relief?  Is it possible that right now Ratzinger is asking if he could return to warn others of his errors, only to have God respond that they have the teaching and the Tradition of the Church, and if they do not listen to those, they will not listen to Ratzinger returned from the dead either.

There were a couple of curiosities here, however.  He asserts that Ratzinger made a deal with Bergoglio in 2005 conclave, where Ratzinger came out on top and Bergoglio was the runner-up, that Ratzinger would be pope for a few years, then resign, then Bergoglio would be pope for a few years, then resign ... all to weaken the papacy and make it something more like a political office.  Is there evidence for this?

Second curiosity is his assertion that Ratzinger sent infiltrators into the seminary at Econe in 1986 and that 9 of them were discovered and expelled.  Is this true and what is the evidence for it? 

Waiting for days or weeks to reveal the the lifetime of heresy Ratzinger espoused and used his considerable power as head of the CDF and Papal Pretender to propagate, seems to destroy the opportunity to reach millions of those who only receive information from Opus Judei controlled outlets and others who are going full defense mode already.

Where is the Charity toward God or the souls of our neighbors if we stay silent while every NO conservative with any media presence or influence spins every possible narrative to pre-empt the truth about the late Ratzinger? News cycles move so fast that waiting too long simply means most people have stopped paying attention and caring, and return to their default position.

Are you willing to go to all of those websites and tell them all about Benendict's heresies? And are you willing that tell them that he wasn't really a pope at all? That would be the brave thing to do, for a sedevacantist. On the other hand, it's much easier to talk about the problems with B16 here, where you won't get too much opposition.

Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI’s last words before he died Saturday were, “Lord, I love you.” according to his longtime secretary.

Source: NY Post

For his sake, that gives a little hope of perfect contrition.

Isn't holding and professing the Catholic Faith a prerequisite for perfect contrition?

I believe so, yes. That's why I said a "little hope". Since he lived privately for the past decade or so, it's impossible for me to say whether or not he repented of his errors.

I believe so, yes. That's why I said a "little hope". Since he lived privately for the past decade or so, it's impossible for me to say whether or not he repented of his errors.

Thank you. Let’s face it, the guy was rotten. With his numerous false teachings he led MANY souls to Hell. Sorry to offend his supporters, but the man wasn’t a Catholic. He was a pertinacious manifest heretic. There, I said it! It is very very very unlikely that he repented and was saved.

I've actually tried.  I've written Ann Barnhardt twice (no, these were not vitriolic or nasty letters, but very polite and respectful), to Taylor Marshall, to Patrick Madrid, and various others, as well as to Father Ripperger on another issue.  I've also written the Dimond Brothers.  Of all these, only the Dimond Brothers responded ... although they did excoriate me for my errors.

I would love to see that letter. 😂