Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall  (Read 2075 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Frank

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 144
  • Reputation: +126/-54
  • Gender: Male
Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
« on: November 25, 2020, 09:55:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • Offline josefamenendez

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5544
    • Reputation: +4177/-290
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #1 on: November 25, 2020, 07:11:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Does the dude on the right ( not TM) tweeze his eyebrows? they are very purposefully shaped to me. Creepy


    Offline Yeti

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4133
    • Reputation: +2432/-528
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #2 on: November 25, 2020, 09:43:23 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • There is nothing whackadoodle about the idea that Sister Lucy was replaced by an imposter. Not unless you think oral surgeons and forensic facial recognition software and things like that are whackadoodle.

    Offline Carissima

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 782
    • Reputation: +569/-229
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #3 on: November 26, 2020, 01:35:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fr Gruner and John Vennari also doubted there were Two Sister Lucy’s. I believe there was plenty of information out there at the time they filmed their segment about the imposter Lucy theory. To this day I am still unsure how they managed to come to the conclusion of ‘doubtful’.
    And now so many years later, with even more proof available, I don’t think Tim and Taylor have much of an excuse reaching similar conclusions.
    Time to do some more homework. 

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5848
    • Reputation: +4694/-490
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #4 on: November 26, 2020, 07:51:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I keep hearing this guy's name but, frankly, I've never read anything by him or seen him anywhere except where people are talking about how stupid he is.

    I'm guessing he's real popular in Novus Ordo circles.


    Offline josefamenendez

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5544
    • Reputation: +4177/-290
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #5 on: November 26, 2020, 09:04:02 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fr Gruner and John Vennari also doubted there were Two Sister Lucy’s. I believe there was plenty of information out there at the time they filmed their segment about the imposter Lucy theory. To this day I am still unsure how they managed to come to the conclusion of ‘doubtful’.
    And now so many years later, with even more proof available, I don’t think Tim and Taylor have much of an excuse reaching similar conclusions.
    Time to do some more homework.
    I know that Fr Gruner did not want to "muddy the waters" about Fatima with the two Sister Lucy theory, however obvious it was. I asked him. He would not address it. I don't think he wanted to lose followers of Fatima due to controversy, but without two sister Lucys' there is no way to account for the complete turnabout of Sister Lucia's positions after the 1960's and beyond (like Our Lady accepted JPll's consecration). The last true interview was with Fr Fuentes in 1957.
    Sister Lucy Truth is just that. The Truth

    Offline Tallinn Trad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 777
    • Reputation: +372/-161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #6 on: November 26, 2020, 09:20:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I can tell you why I had a problem with the two Sister Lucy theory and I knew that this was the reason for my non-acceptance at the time.  I did not ever think that the theory was without merit but I did not believe it because....

    It makes you call EVERYTHING into question.

    There are some rabbit-holes I am not prepared to go down.

    Once you have a world so weird and mercurial that visionary nuns are bumped off and replaced by imposters and their own families are fooled by the imposter, then you are in a world where you cannot have any confidence as to what is true and what is false.

    • What if Francis is secretly a traditionalist and playing 4D chess to fully expose the bishops and their connections to the deep state?
    • What if Michael Matt is controlled opposition.
    • Perhaps Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer is deliberately planted by the SSPX to ruin the credibility of the resistance.

    How does one navigate and make decisions and decide where to go to mass and who to trust in a world where such dramatic cօռspιʀαcιҽs are possible?

    And what was the point of switching out Sister Lucy with a fraud?  The fraud did not accomplish much for her 50 years of pretence.  She hardly did any interviews and was mostly silent.

    It is sobering to understand that her relatives and fellow nuns believed it was the same Sister Lucia.  The two sister Lucia theory was posited by Marion Horvat.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12589
    • Reputation: +8014/-2488
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #7 on: November 26, 2020, 09:31:02 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    There are some rabbit-holes I am not prepared to go down.

    Once you have a world so weird and mercurial that visionary nuns are bumped off and replaced by imposters and their own families are fooled by the imposter, then you are in a world where you cannot have any confidence as to what is true and what is false.

    Take the red pill.  Open your eyes to the global, freemasonic matrix that we've all been living in since the 1800s, and which St Pope Pius X (and the real Sr Lucy) warned us about.  It's real, it's everywhere and it's dark.  Once you understand the depths of organized evil that face us, then you will appreciate the power and help of Our Lady all the more because only She will bring the victory!  And a crushing, complete Victory it will be...Ave Maria!


    Offline dymphnaw

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 415
    • Reputation: +266/-139
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #8 on: November 26, 2020, 10:00:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There is nothing whackadoodle about the idea that Sister Lucy was replaced by an imposter. Not unless you think oral surgeons and forensic facial recognition software and things like that are whackadoodle.
    Okay I'll ask the questions that nobody seems to want to bring up. If Sr. Lucy simply died then why bring in a fake? Even if she had received the same low level of "care" that Jacinta endured would the public have had any idea of it?  If Sr. Lucy was murdered then who did it? Murder means that her superior, the entire convent and her own family  who, to be fair were of little to no help to no help to her when she was a child,  all would have known or had an idea that something was wrong and all stayed silent out of fear. That's a heart breaking thing to contemplate so I suppose many people wouldn't want to deal with it.  

    Offline Tallinn Trad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 777
    • Reputation: +372/-161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #9 on: November 26, 2020, 10:46:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Take the red pill.  Open your eyes to the global, freemasonic matrix that we've all been living in since the 1800s, and which St Pope Pius X (and the real Sr Lucy) warned us about.  It's real, it's everywhere and it's dark.  Once you understand the depths of organized evil that face us, then you will appreciate the power and help of Our Lady all the more because only She will bring the victory!  And a crushing, complete Victory it will be...Ave Maria!
    I can believe all that without taking the red pill.
    The reality that I can see, wokism, fornication, adultery, divorce, a Pope who is an apostate, clergy predating on young seminarians and children, is evil enough for me to understand that humanly we are lost and only Heaven can save us.
    The problem with the Red pill is that I don't even know who my friends are.  And that is depressing as all get-out.

    Offline choakley

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 211
    • Reputation: +158/-168
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #10 on: November 26, 2020, 11:46:11 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fr Gruner and John Vennari also doubted there were Two Sister Lucy’s. I believe there was plenty of information out there at the time they filmed their segment about the imposter Lucy theory. To this day I am still unsure how they managed to come to the conclusion of ‘doubtful’.
    And now so many years later, with even more proof available, I don’t think Tim and Taylor have much of an excuse reaching similar conclusions.
    Time to do some more homework.

    As with any enterprise, scandal is not good for business. Sadly, Fatima became an enterprise a long time ago. Keeping scandal contained keeps the money coming in.


    Offline choakley

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 211
    • Reputation: +158/-168
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #11 on: November 26, 2020, 11:58:05 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Okay I'll ask the questions that nobody seems to want to bring up. If Sr. Lucy simply died then why bring in a fake?
    To attenuate or soften the real Fatima message and warnings or to back up a fabrication.

    If Sr. Lucy was murdered then who did it?
    Those responsible for Sr. Lucy didn't necessarily have to kill her. They could've isolated her to a more remote convent for the remainder of her life, while convincing her family they were corresponding with her by mail, if that's possible.

    Did any of her family ever publicly communicate with the imposter?  

    Offline Frank

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 144
    • Reputation: +126/-54
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #12 on: November 26, 2020, 02:18:55 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • Here are a couple answers for you Tallin Trad:

    I know some fake traditionalists that remain “ok” with the Novus Ordo because they believe Sister Lucy was “ok” with the Novus Ordo.
    So there is one reason the liars foisted the Sr. Lucy deception.

    Also, spoiler alert, Micheal Matt does belong to the controlled resistance. How? Because he is a Trad-ecuмenist, which Archbishop Lefebvre so explicitly condemned as traitorous.

    Offline Carissima

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 782
    • Reputation: +569/-229
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #13 on: November 26, 2020, 03:37:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I can tell you why I had a problem with the two Sister Lucy theory and I knew that this was the reason for my non-acceptance at the time.  I did not ever think that the theory was without merit but I did not believe it because....

    It makes you call EVERYTHING into question.

    There are some rabbit-holes I am not prepared to go down.

    Once you have a world so weird and mercurial that visionary nuns are bumped off and replaced by imposters and their own families are fooled by the imposter, then you are in a world where you cannot have any confidence as to what is true and what is false.

    • What if Francis is secretly a traditionalist and playing 4D chess to fully expose the bishops and their connections to the deep state?
    • What if Michael Matt is controlled opposition.
    • Perhaps Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer is deliberately planted by the SSPX to ruin the credibility of the resistance.

    How does one navigate and make decisions and decide where to go to mass and who to trust in a world where such dramatic cօռspιʀαcιҽs are possible?

    And what was the point of switching out Sister Lucy with a fraud?  The fraud did not accomplish much for her 50 years of pretence.  She hardly did any interviews and was mostly silent.

    It is sobering to understand that her relatives and fellow nuns believed it was the same Sister Lucia.  The two sister Lucia theory was posited by Marion Horvat.
    I can actually see what you mean and I truly empathize. Perhaps the sheer magnitude of it all is just too much for some. 
    To me the truth is so important I’m willing to look most places, though it can be dangerous to do this also. More than one of my brothers lost their Catholic Faith due to endless rabbit holes. I stay away from the ones that question Christianity but with the infiltration in the Church, just about anything else is possible it would seem. 

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5848
    • Reputation: +4694/-490
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Another reason to doubt Taylor Marshall
    « Reply #14 on: November 26, 2020, 04:02:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And what was the point of switching out Sister Lucy with a fraud?  The fraud did not accomplish much for her 50 years of pretence.  She hardly did any interviews and was mostly silent.

    I think the first frauds with Montini was all that was intended.  What was accomplished?  The vast majority of people fully accepted the Revolution.  Today, the number of Catholics is miniscule, most people who claim to be Catholics are manifestly heretics and apostates.  Seems to me that the fraud accomplished quite a bit.