CathInfo.com

So pretty much the "I'm. Coming. Out." thread was the zwitter shoving his secret V2 religion docuмent down member's throats; and, all the while "it's" companions were coming out of the wood work to state their sympathy and support for his taking estrogen pills.  :read-paper:

That is a whack ass forum, right there. $50 says the owner will be shaking the donations box, soon; I'm not too sure the committed cattle are willing to be milked this time.

That thread went on for some 38 pages of non stop defending the fαɢɢօt's "Human Dignity". The valiant ones defending God's Rights were pinned down and raped into submission by the board's owner.

Tools utilized by the fαɢɢօt, his minions, and the board owner to kick up dirt into God's face? The Vatican II religion's 'Catechism', a sub secretum pastoral docuмent promulgated under "John Paul the Great Apostate's" regnum.

I did a search for "sub secretum" and found a university link with the fαɢɢօt's laurel'd news source; in it, this being the first time I viewed the docuмent, I found this: "-- An analysis of the moral licitness of "sex-change" operations. It
concludes that the procedure could be morally acceptable in certain
extreme cases if a medical probability exists that it will "cure" the
patient's internal turmoil." An apparent endorsement by that vile religion, for the sex change operation. The final section is a fortune cookie: in it, Bergoglio is seen in the Buenos Aires Archdiocese during August, 2012 -the time in which a well known tranny is wedded in the basilica.

"-- An affirmation of the validity of marriages in which one partner
later undergoes the procedure, unless a church tribunal determines
that a transsɛҳuąƖ disposition predated the wedding ceremony."

John Paul the Great Apostate's regnum issued that call, which twelve years later is put into practice by Bergoglio's Archdiocese. It is an official declaration in the Vatican II Religion, that one can get a sex change after marriage, or have the sex change and then get married by a priest in a Basilica:

http://novusordowatch.org/wire/homo-baptism-buenos-aires.htm

-Cabró Encabronado

Quote from: sedetrad

Is one of the posters at fisheaters a transɛҳuąƖ? I was perusing some older articles on fisheaters and noticed a poster that likes to play dress up in effeminate period piece clothing and I wondered if he was the token transɛҳuąƖ on fisheaters. The site is so foul that it wouldn't surpirse me.

Why would you care? Pray for that person and leave him to the mercy of God.

Took you long enough to insert your Novussy opinion here.  But I'm not terribly surprised, as followers of the NO are usually slow to address public scandal.

All of us must care because that cesspool labels itself as a "Traditional Catholic Forum," when there is nothing Traditional or Catholic about its owner and over half its active membership.  It's not representative of Trads, it's representative of "smells and bells" liberals.  And Trannygate has served well to dispel whatever illusion of Catholicity the place had left.

Quote from: tmw89

Quote from: poche

Quote from: sedetrad

Is one of the posters at fisheaters a transɛҳuąƖ? I was perusing some older articles on fisheaters and noticed a poster that likes to play dress up in effeminate period piece clothing and I wondered if he was the token transɛҳuąƖ on fisheaters. The site is so foul that it wouldn't surpirse me.

Why would you care? Pray for that person and leave him to the mercy of God.

Took you long enough to insert your Novussy opinion here.  But I'm not terribly surprised, as followers of the NO are usually slow to address public scandal.

All of us must care because that cesspool labels itself as a "Traditional Catholic Forum," when there is nothing Traditional or Catholic about its owner and over half its active membership.  It's not representative of Trads, it's representative of "smells and bells" liberals.  And Trannygate has served well to dispel whatever illusion of Catholicity the place had left.

This was the attitude of the Abbot Moses regarding the sins of others;
 When a brother committed a fault and Moses was invited to a meeting to discuss an appropriate penance, Moses refused to attend. When he was again called to the meeting, Moses took a leaking jug filled with water and carried it on his shoulder. Another version of the story has him carrying a basket filled with sand. When he arrived at the meeting place, the others asked why he was carrying the jug. He replied, "My sins run out behind me and I do not see them, but today I am coming to judge the errors of another." On hearing this, the assembled brothers forgave the erring monk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Moses_the_Black

A monastery, closed to the world, and a public website - open to the scrutiny of the world - are not the same thing.  Not even close.

The case you describe entails a monk who failed to live up to his Rule, and at least knew as much.  No indication is given of the nature of the sin, but unless other details are provided I don't think it's too much a leap to presume this monk respects Natural Law.  On Fish Eaters, a man has made the claim that he has mutilated himself and that the Catholic Church issued a secret docuмent attesting that such Satanic nonsense (not that he acknowledges it thus, but that is what it is - the perversion of the human body is the perversion of a temple of God) is permissible; whereas the Spotless Bride of Christ could never in any situation whatsoever condone such behavior.

Can the Church give error?

Can the Church allow in any situation whatsoever a man to mutilate his body and live as a woman?

It's only further evidence that the organization which you ceaselessly defend, the Conciliar Church, is a counterfeit, to say nothing of the outrageous scandal of the whole thing.

And you say the SSPX is outside the Church?  Ha!