Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
More opinion. Your not considering it proof does not dismiss any evidence presented.
You are a total dirtbag, incapable of giving the man the benefit of the doubt regarding his conversion. There's is no "evidence" ... it's complete garbage. You people remain pertinacious in slandering people without evidence.
Gang sign. Not easy to do. Try it.
Weren't you the one that failed to watch the trailer first, rushed to his defense anyway, and then did a quick "my bad" as an apology? That didn't seem to slow you down at all.
Please explain.
My rash judgment of the film doesn't call into question whether his conversion was genuine.
It does your judgment.
You do know going from thread to thread being vindictive isn't a good thing, right?
He is an utter heretic. Don't forget this zinger where he unpacks the total indifferentism of Vatican II for Shapiro. ...
It really shows you where Barron's heart lies
The saint does not say that. Just some extra in a scene unrelated to Pio. Watch the trailer instead of rashly judging.
Exactly. We are all sinners and constantly converting.I've seen people use foul language on CI. What's their excuse? Is their Catholic belief disingenuous? It doesn't excuse the film or the writers for putting such obscenity in the mouth of a holy monk, but let's not get beyond ourselves here and start judging the guy's move toward the Truth just because he isn't perfect right out of the gate. His own words in the interview paint him as a much more genuine Catholic than the so-called "bishop" interviewing him.
Here is a sampling of your own words:If you are going to dish it out, don't pretend to be a dainty soul when you are called out for your errors. You could have apologized and moved on rather than try to salvage a bad opinion.
... The instance where I made a rash judgment was acknowledged, but you're drudging it up for no reason other than that you have your panties in a bunch because Lad called you and epiphany out on your BS.
Oh, epiphany and I are a group now, eh? You couldn't even understand the post you are replying to me over, but here you are judging my motives and inventing associations. No, no, I advised you to stop pretending at being so easily offended.
It's an "M"It's not easy to do (try it) so it's clearly deliberate.
I can easily do the sign on its own and when I held an item to my body my index and pinky were slightly pointed outwards and the middle and ring fingers were just slightly more separated than Shia's.It's not clearly delibarate. At best it's possible and considering this guy's history it's unlikely. In charity, you are obliged to dismiss the possibility unless a mountain of other circuмstantial evidence supports the theory.