Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Slow Boiling the Mass Fashions of Women  (Read 28528 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Slow Boiling the Mass Fashions of Women
« Reply #50 on: March 13, 2018, 09:12:19 AM »
Most of the young girls at my SSPX chapel outside of mass, wear short shorts, tight jeans, tight revealing tank tops with belly exposed and such clothing same as anybody else in the world. If the fashions you posted are for every day wear, they are a step in the right direction.

Some of the items though remind me of movies. There are some (very few) excellent movies, that teach a good lesson, entertain, or provide  a good laugh (comedies), however, coming from Hollywood, they practically always contain one scene or a few words that makes the entire movie unwatchable for children and young adults. There is absolutely no need to add those scenes, as they only detract from the movie, but Hollywood has its purpose for adding those little details, to corrupt young people.

I am a father of quite a few girls.  In the case of those fashions you posted, they are like the excellent movies I just described above, everything is fine, except they added something totally unnecessary which makes it unwearable for my girls. The two white tops are see through and the underwear is colored. There is no need for the see through, or the colored underwear below. If you blow up the first picture you will see what I mean. In the second picture, it is not as clear. The two tops are also tight. If those two models were built like Marilyn Monroe, there would be no difference between the tight sweater picture I posted of her and the white tops in your pictures.

There is no need for the tops to be see through, or tight, or the underwear colored. If those details were corrected, then these outfits could be worn by my girls.
Same goes for the young ladies at my sspx chapel, except they often wear the immodest clothing to mass, too.  Nightie looking things, mid thigh skirts, super tight blouses (even from the "bonnet people" girls). Some of the girls post photos of themselves in bikinis on their Facebook pages.
I agree with the fashion comments you posted, too.  We just don't allow white blouses anymore because we can't find any that are NOT see through.

Re: Slow Boiling the Mass Fashions of Women
« Reply #51 on: March 13, 2018, 09:14:56 AM »
These examples were only shown to give a rough idea of ‘modern modest’.
I tweak clothing for my younger girls quite easily, which one could do similarly with these outfits also.
One example: Do you know those formal dresses for girls that are mostly tank style that come out every Spring? My solution, I put a white collared school shirt underneath(pictured below)..modesty problem solved. So no more fretting over not being able to find modest dresses I just use cotton shirts and sweaters. Easy-peasy: )
Yeah, i tried that, too.  Problem is, when my daughter grew up and moved out, she was so used to buying such dresses that she continued to buy such but began to forget the undershirt.
I say a big fat NO to modifying immodest clothing to try to make it modest.  If it can't be worn as-is, it doesn't belong in my house or on my children.


Re: Slow Boiling the Mass Fashions of Women
« Reply #52 on: March 13, 2018, 09:44:46 AM »
Here is a snippet from an older related thread that is foundational in the discussion we are having here. That tight sweater fashion in the Marilyn Monroe picture is worn by many ladies in my chapel who are over 50, and it is a bad example to the young girls. When the young girls, like a 23 year old Marilyn Monroe type, wear the same fashion it becomes scandalous. The problem is that knit fabric was always underwear, it is now underwear being worn on the outside. Why do women wear stretch tight underwear on the outside? Here is why they do it (the thread https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/what-is-immodest-dress-to-the-sspx-clergy/  goes into more detail):



Here is the lesson I teach my daughters from the time they start noticing boys:

Women erroneously learn from other women that their beauty and value comes from the attraction they can bring to themselves from men. They are taught that the way to attract men is to dress provocatively and to flirt. In poor countries this is the way a woman can become rich overnight, however, it is like the lottery, 99+% of the women  will lose and will spend an entire life of misery, always wondering why they go from man to man, till their grave.

Once a young girl is infected with this mindset, they are caught for life.


Practically all women have this decease. It is the foundation of all immodesty and immorality.

Those that have eyes to see, let them see.

Re: Slow Boiling the Mass Fashions of Women
« Reply #53 on: March 13, 2018, 10:04:52 AM »

Here is the lesson I teach my daughters from the time they start noticing boys:

Women erroneously learn from other women that their beauty and value comes from the attraction they can bring to themselves from men. They are taught that the way to attract men is to dress provocatively and to flirt. In poor countries this is the way a woman can become rich overnight, however, it is like the lottery, 99+% of the women  will lose and will spend an entire life of misery, always wondering why they go from man to man, till their grave.
There has been for some reason a sudden arrival of Novus Ordo Latina women to our chapel. Latina women are the most affected group by this dress provocatively to attract men mindset, and despite bouncing from one man to another all their lives, they continue with the same error, teaching it to their daughters. Here is an example of the typical clothes they wear to mass, everything is always skin tight, like sausage casing.



Re: Slow Boiling the Mass Fashions of Women
« Reply #54 on: March 13, 2018, 10:12:30 AM »
Until the peoples of Latin America realize that their wealth is in the Faith, and they return TO LIVE as Catholics, they will continue on the same path of poverty, immorality, illegitimate births, abortions, and crime.

Theodore Roosevelt when he paid a visit to South America at the turn of the 20th century said: “While these countries remain Catholic,” he said, “we will not be able to dominate them.”

Put another way, as long as the people are fallen away Catholics, CINO’s, Protestants, pagans, athiests, and Marxists, they can be easily dominated. As is the case today.

Outside of the Catholic Faith, and what little remains of the Catholic culture in Latin America, I see little to be proud of. Without the Faith, Latin America is just another Africa.