Any amount (everyone's different) where you start to loose your inhibitions is too much.…

The principle can also be appropriately applied to the use of disinhibitory doses of marijuana (see the knock-down-drag-out thread from years ago on MJ medical and recreational use).

Even as regards alcohol, this statement is seriously deficient because it fails to address the intended purpose of consumption.

Consider the agonizing pain of malignant bone metastases. The amount of opioids necessary to kill such pain is "disinhibitory," yet such use is well protected in Catholic moral theology.

The application of the principle to the use of alcohol is outdated, but still worth mentioning. Alcohol was used medically to inhibit premature labor. Such use was also well-protected in Catholic moral theology. There are more efficacious alternative drugs available today, but, hypothetically, if such drugs were not timely available, a disinhibitory dose of alcohol would still be protected in Catholic moral theology.

The principle can also be appropriately applied to the use of disinhibitory doses of marijuana (see the knock-down-drag-out thread from years ago on MJ medical and recreational use).

Shocking to some, the case can also be made for disinhibitory doses of cocaine. Cocaine is the local anesthetic par excellence for surgical procedures on mucous membranes because not only is it an excellent local anesthetic, but is also an efficacious vasoconstrictor that reduces bleeding during the surgery).

Your "facts" are merely foolish opinions that cannot be suported by any objective evidence.

Recreational use of Marijuana


1. Opens the soul to demonic influence.
2. Weakens moral judgement
3. Promotes immorality

1-3: Potential loss of inhibition is dose-related, just as it is with alcohol. It is a manageable risk, just as it is with alcohol.


4. Fosters narcissism
5. Leads to moral pessimism

4-5: Gratuitous, subjective, evidence-free assertions that I reject.

6. Is socially and morally divisive

6: Freeing slaves was socially and morally divisive and it was the right thing to do.
 
7. Promotes laziness toward Catholic works

7: Gratuitous, subjective, evidence-free assertion that I reject.

8. Promotes disobedience to priests and the Church

8: Rubbish. There is no authoritative proscription explicit to MJ. MJ must be considered under the same moral theology as alcohol.

9. Promotes disobedience to secular authority

9: What part of "increasingly legalized" and "no longer a gateway to criminal world" don't you understand?

10.  Is a safety issue for children who's parents use.
11. Causes neglect, and abuse of children by parents who use

10-11: Gratuitous, subjective, evidence-free assertion that I reject. Cf. alcohol.

12. Dulls sense of guilt and is counter to Sacrament of Confession

12: Potential loss of inhibition is dose-related, just as it is with alcohol. It is a manageable risk, just as it is with alcohol.

13. Profanes the reception of the Eucharist

13: If an honest risk/benefit assessment makes its use sinless, there is no profanation.

14. Is falsely equated with moderate use of alcohol

14: CORRECT! Medically, alcohol is much less beneficial and much more toxic.
 
15. Often leads to use of other drugs

15: Long argued. Largely related to an illegal substance being obtained from criminals.

16. Promotes secrecy and leads to animosity
17. Promotes other crime
18. Often destroys relationships
19. Impedes the desire to attain heaven
20. Leads to a liberal and worldly mindset
21. Retards emotions

16-21: Gratuitous, subjective, evidence-free assertions that I reject.

22. Wastes opportunities for good

22: Using a beneficial medicine increases opportunities for good.

23 Impedes Christ's mandate to evangelize

23: Gratuitous, subjective, evidence-free assertion that I reject.

24 Denies Scripture's command to stay sober

24: As with alcohol.

25 Denies the modest conduct of Our Lady
26 Leads to the unforgivable sin of despair
27 Is often its own object of worship

25-27: Gratuitous, subjective, evidence-free assertion that I reject.

28. Causes certain kinds of brain damage

28: Benefits certain types of "brain damage," e.g., multiple sclerosis, dystonias, et al.


29. Often leads to other addictions

25: see #15. Argument from Repetition.

30. Inhibits holiness

30: see #'s 1-3, 7-8, 12-13, 22-27. Argument from Repetition.

31. Is well founded in paganism, abhorred in Christendom

31: Pagans also breathe air and eat food. Ad hominem/guilt by association.

32. Is proven by all the above to be a "sacrament" of the diabolic

32: see #'s 1-31
 
This list is by no means exhaustive, barely even scratches the surface. After it exceeded 21, I figured this was enough to get the picture.  If anyone disagrees, present your argument.  Whatever you do, don't smoke weed, rather, do penance for the salvation of souls.

No. Your list is not exhaustive, just exhausting in its repetition of logical fallacies and utter lack of evidence.

Yes. Do penance.

Fact:  I shouldn’t have to be exposed to pot while I’m in public.