Just thinking out loud here.

So, when we see, there are various light waves coming from an object, either reflected or generated by the object itself, and these light waves come in different wavelengths, which then some combination of the eyeball (or organ of sight) and the brain, interpret as different "colors".  Some people are color blind and can't see them all.  Various animals see some wavelengths but not others.  In fact, there are many wavelengths of light that are there but that we cannot see, e.g. infrared, ultraviolet, the different kinds of radiation, etc.  If we had more of these "cones" in our eyeballs, we might see them, and then the brain might interpret them as even different "colors" (which is an interpretation of some intelligibility that allows us to distinguish one from the other).  But, then, I imagine, that the soul (both the higher faculties and the lower sensible faculties ... since there in fact a "sensible part of the soul", in addition to the higher faculties) somehow can sense and "know" (turn into some intelligible -- immaterial -- form) ALL the different wavelengths of light, radiation, etc.  AND it would sense / know about every photon (or wave or whatever) of light being emitted by something, and it would know / hear every soundwave (even if it's tiny and inaudible by our current sense organs for hearing, e.g. the ear), whereas our sense organ currently limits or constrains our ability to hear sounds that are either two "low" in volume, or perhaps blended in with other waves, or too high or low in pitch, etc.  So not only is there light, but sound, and all manner of other sensible / corporeal reality all around us that the sensible parts of our souls would be able to perceive directly when removed from the constraints of our physical sense organs, but we also wouldn't be limited by things such as "distance" from the object, etc.  So, based on these considerations, I believe that in theory, it's theoretically possible that some drug could free us from the constrains of our physical sense organs and provide a more direct and intelligible perception of reality ... though there's no evidence or proof that that is what is happening with these drugs, and that the drugs are simply lifting these constraints vs. creating experiences by directly acting upon our brains, which are the receptors and interpreters of all this perceived sense information.

Jorge answers: "Yes!!!" https://web.archive.org/web/20191011112644/callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-rebbe-explains-hasidic-stratagem-of.html


the Rebbe explains the Hasidic stratagem of “descent for sake of ascent”

As regular readers of this blog know, Francis is into all things Judaic, especially Chasidism.  Their doctrines creep out here and there in Francis’ sermons and docuмents.  One of the things which Francis does with regularity is to invert the teachings of the Church.  An example of this is the use of the term ‘pharisee’ which he applies to his enemies, who are not open to тαℓмυdic Judaism and Francis’ anti-Catholic machinations.  Another example is his favorite blasphemous painting, White Crucifixion.  Francis shows his hand, when he inverts Catholic doctrine, as a modernist change agent who is simply following the dictates of ‘The Rebbe’ to be, “modern on the outside and Chabad on the inside.” One of the most blatant examples is Francis teaching the тαℓмυdic formula: Yeridah Tzorech Aliyah (“decent for sake of ascent”).  This teaching simply means that one has to descend into sin, which paradoxically has a positive status in Hasidism, in order to ascend to new heights.  This is done because the god of тαℓмυdic Judaism is one of opposites — a hermaphrodite god of good/evil.  In the Hasidic lore, tzaddiks (saints or righteous people) wrestle not with evil but with goodness as they descend into sin in this process in order to ascend into righteousness.  Yeridah Tzorech Aliyah is one of the foundational beliefs of Orthodox тαℓмυdic Judaism along with Tikun Olam.  In the later belief the rabbis have the chutzpah to state that God made creation imperfect and the тαℓмυdic Jєωs are to correct his work.

The Hasidism of Francis’ mind is also shown when he says such things as, “[Jesus] made himself the devil” and “the Holy Trinity [is] arguing behind closed doors but on the outside they give the picture of unity.”  Who else sees Jesus as a devil or God as a bunch of arguing rabbis other than a тαℓмυdist?  Whether he his parroting the ideas of Heschel, Levinas, Buber, Wiesel, a dead rebbe from the Steppes, or having over rabbis as guests who often gift him with books (Gluck & Steinsaltz) there’s an excellent chance it’s comes from the Baal Shem Tov and his cult in one manner or another.

In the video clip below the late Chabad Lubavitcher rabbi, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, explains why Hasids should descend (into sin) in order to ascend — they are hunters getting ready to kill their prey.  Another late Chasidic rabbi, Abraham Heschel (of Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate), in a 1965 interview with Ma'ariv explained exactly whom the prey were, “There are those who would like to attack [Christians] bodies. I want to attack their souls.”  The elevation which takes place is one which will incorporate the prey’s soul into the of cult тαℓмυdic Judaism and worship of their demonic hermaphrodite god.  It’s a total inversion of Catholicism, the religion instituted by Jesus the Christ.  So why is Francis teaching it?

Moving Back to Move Forward (1980)

video source:  https://tinyurl.com/2n5n8jey 

Just because God can bring good from evil does not make evil good. Should we sin that grace may abound?

I think it's important to precise that we can do any physical evil (for example war), but never moral evil (sin itself), witch is always contrary to the will of God.

Just because God can bring good from evil does not make evil good. Should we sin that grace may abound?