Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: clareQuote...dressing like men, including slacks and tights; low necklines; -- are absolutely contrary to the norms of Christian modesty. Tights?? Men's dress? Contrary to Christian modesty? Uh?Yes, that's true. I read it from the Modesty Crusade.
Quote...dressing like men, including slacks and tights; low necklines; -- are absolutely contrary to the norms of Christian modesty. Tights?? Men's dress? Contrary to Christian modesty? Uh?
...dressing like men, including slacks and tights; low necklines; -- are absolutely contrary to the norms of Christian modesty.
Quote from: JoanScholasticaQuote from: clareQuote...dressing like men, including slacks and tights; low necklines; -- are absolutely contrary to the norms of Christian modesty. Tights?? Men's dress? Contrary to Christian modesty? Uh?Yes, that's true. I read it from the Modesty Crusade. But, but, but! Why??Why are tights contrary to Christian modesty?Why are stockings or bare legs acceptable under a long skirt, but tights aren't???I don't get it!
I don't know where I read it and will try to find the source, but it is said to be immodest to wear sheer stockings. I'm guessing it is because you can see the leg, unlike the tights that are colored and thicker, therefore not transparent.
Quote from: CherylI don't know where I read it and will try to find the source, but it is said to be immodest to wear sheer stockings. I'm guessing it is because you can see the leg, unlike the tights that are colored and thicker, therefore not transparent.I still don't get why wearing sheer stockings or tights would be less modest than not wearing them!