I thought it would be a good idea to outline why I hold the opinion I have. I've cited this book earlier in the thread, and it is not online, just portions of it for sample reading to get you to purchase the book, but I guarantee, it's the best $8 you can spend as a wife and mother if you don't already have it. Yes it was written by a protestant, but most of what is in there is more Catholic than any Novus Ordo book you'll pick up.
Exerpt from Fascinating Womanhood:
The Provider
A man needs to function, feel needed, and excel women as a provider.
Since the beginning of time, the man has been recognized as the provider. The first commandment given him was, "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread till thou return to the earth, out of which thou wast taken: for dust thou art, and into dust thou shalt return." This commandment was given, not to the woman, but to the man. The woman was instructed to bring forth children. From this time forth their duties have been thus divided.
This arrangement has been honored by tradition, custom, and even courts of the law. In the event of divorce men are still legally bound to pay alimony; thus they continue to earn the bread so the mother can nurture the children. This plan is important to live, however, not because of custom or law but because it is God's command.
Another reason the man should provide: Inborn in a man is a keen sense of responsibility to provide the living and to function effectively in this role. Being successful in this area of his life is as important to his feeling of worth, as a woman's is in succeeding as a mother and homemaker.
As the man fulfills his masculine duty as the provider, it presents a tender, romantic scene as the following nursery rhyme:
By, baby bunting,
Daddy's gone a hunting,
To get a little rabbit skin,
To wrap his baby bunting in.
Picture, if you can, a mother at home nurturing her little ones, making a comfortable home for her family, the father goes out into the world struggling against the elements and oppositions of life to bring home the necessities and comforts for his loved ones. This romantic scene, instead of being taken for granted, should be viewed as the heart and core of life which, when lived properly, brings soul satisfaction that cannot be measured. There is nothing equal to it and nothing more important.
A man also has an inborn need to feel needed as a provider, to feel that his wife depends on him for financial support and can't get by without him. In addition, he has an inborn need to excel women as a provider. A man's feeling of worth can be undermined when he sees women in the workforce doing a better job than he, advancing to a higher position, or earning more pay. How much worse when his own wife excels him.
What a Man Should Provide
An excellent description of what a man should provide is from my husband's book, Man of Steel and Velvet:
"Simply stated, the man should provide the necessities. This means food, clothing, and a shelter, plus a few comforts and conveniences.... Through all generations of time it has been recognized that when a man marries, his wife and children are entitled to his financial support. Failure to meet this obligation has been just cause for divorce, and even after the marriage separation, a man is still under financial obligation. Financial support and, along with this, fidelity have always been the two main entitlements for a woman in marriage. But whether these laws remain in force or not, the moral and sacred obligation is just as binding, the need just as great.
"It's important that a man provide a shelter separate from anyone else. This is important for the sake of privacy and giving the wife the opportunity of making a home in her own way. Perhaps this is why a special instruction was given by God in the very beginning: Wherefore a man shall leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they shall be two in one flesh. (Gen 2:24) Under stress of circuмstances there may be occasions when a man must move his wife and children into another household. Although there may be justification temporarily, it's contrary to the divine plan and unfair to the wife if this situation extends beyond a brief emergency.
"Although a man has a sacred and binding obligation to provide the necessities, he is under no such obligation to provide the luxuries. Women and children are not entitled to ease and luxury, to style and elegance. His duty is not to provide a costly home, expensive furniture, and decor. Concerning the education of his children, he has an obligation to provide a basic education, but such a binding obligation doesn't extend to a higher education, music lessons, the arts and cultures. He may wish to provide these, and it may bring him much pleasure to do so, but it's not mandatory.
"In providing a high standard of living, some men make near economic slaves of themselves, with great disadvantage to themselves and their families. Too often a man is so consumed with meeting ever-increasing demands, not only by his family, but by himself. that he does not preserve himself for things of greater value. He has little time to give to his wife and children, time to teach them the values of life, how to live, standards to follow, and time to build strong family ties.
"A man is also entitled to time for himself, for recreation, study, and meditation. He has a further need to be of service outside his own circle, a commitment to society. Church service is an important responsibility. Men have talents which need to be shared, ability which could be developed to make the world a better place. It is not right for a man to spend his entire time and energy to provide luxuries for his own family circle."
(I'll add more later.)