Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?  (Read 3068 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2021, 10:37:21 PM »
edit

Offline Emile

  • Supporter
Re: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?
« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2021, 12:30:39 AM »
The talk about geocentrism brought to mind a catechism class that I downloaded from SSPX Asia at least 10-12 years ago (relevant clip attached below). Fr. Scott gets upset that anyone would consider geocentrism true.

I think it is an example of why we need to examine the beliefs that we have picked up from the world, especially "proven science".


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2021, 05:20:42 AM »
I don’t believe Cassini holds that the Church actively taught error, just that it tolerated it.  Those are two different things.  I disagree with Lane’s contention that the toleration of error is not possible.

I believe that the toleration of Molinism was also a mistake, and so were some of the things tolerated by Pius XII.

Re: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2021, 05:39:19 AM »
Just asking, because I know he considers the encyclical Providentissimus Deus to be a “post-Galileo U-turn” which taught error to the universal Church.
Why don’t / didn’t you message Cassini discretely?

Re: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2021, 06:04:36 AM »
I don’t believe Cassini holds that the Church actively taught error, just that it tolerated it.  Those are two different things.  I disagree with Lane’s contention that the toleration of error is not possible.

I believe that the toleration of Molinism was also a mistake, and so were some of the things tolerated by Pius XII.
It seems that others in the Canonization thread are saying that the Church actively taught error with respect to Geocentrism (ie. actively taught error before Vatican II).  

Knowing the Catholic Church can not universally teach error in faith and morals, can you speak more to this "toleration" here or there?