Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?  (Read 3087 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?
« Reply #25 on: April 20, 2021, 06:44:10 PM »
Would that the Jesuits had remained permanently suppressed.
Once again Ladislaus, as many faithful traditionalists secretly do, wishes that the Jansenists had won.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?
« Reply #26 on: April 20, 2021, 08:05:06 PM »
Once again Ladislaus, as many faithful traditionalists secretly do, wishes that the Jansenists had won.

Ridiculous.  Jesuits should have been suppressed had they caused but 10% of the damage they actually did.  You need to study up a bit in all that the Jesuits “accomplished” throughout their history.  That first generation after St. Ignatius had some remarkable saints.  But it was downhill almost immediately after that.  Soon they asked to be dispensed from the Divine Office.  St. Pius V really disliked them.


Re: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?
« Reply #27 on: April 20, 2021, 10:27:59 PM »
Once again Ladislaus, as many faithful traditionalists secretly do, wishes that the Jansenists had won.
The Jesuits were and are theological cyanide. It can't be any more obvious. If your religious order produces TV figure Democrat mouthpiece priests and basketball players more than it produces orthodox priests, it was never good in the first place.

Re: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?
« Reply #28 on: April 21, 2021, 12:21:49 AM »
The history of the damage done by the 1820-35 concession to heliocentrist books, and therefore to a heliocentric reinterpretation, continued into Pope Pius X's reign.
.
Oh no.  Not GEOCENTRISM again and the "INFALLIBLE" decree of Pius V.
Haven't we had enough of this ?

Re: Is Cassini a Sedevacantist?
« Reply #29 on: April 21, 2021, 06:48:44 AM »
Would that the Jesuits had remained permanently suppressed.

Chardin was one of the biggest enemies of the faith ever, and then you had the Jesuits promoting neo-Pelagianism and religious indifferentism.  Even Adam Weishaupt was Jesuit-trained.

After his novitiate in the Society of Jesus, Bergoglio officially became a Jesuit on 12 March 1960, when he made the religious profession of the initial, perpetual vows of poverty, chastity and obedience of a member of the order. Now he is Pope.

It seems the jesuits were/are the intellectuals of the priesthood.

Intelligence, the extent or ability of one’s reasoning, while a great gift from God comes with a high price tag, especially when engaging in matters challenging traditional Catholic metaphysics, theology, and even dogma. St Augustine once affirmed: ‘If there were no pride, there would be no heresy.’ In 2015, an exorcist in Barcelona said of all the sins preferred by Satan, pride was the greatest. We all want to be clever, and the cleverer the better; fallen man revels in ‘vainglory in one’s own reasoning’ as Galileo boasted. Such a talent produces an interior, personal and social satisfaction that is irresistible to those that have it. It can bring honour, glory, respect, advantage, reward, and fame to some who excel in any given field of knowledge. Francis Bacon understood this very well when he recognised that ‘knowledge is power.’ Yes, conforming and contributing to a consensus can be a path to success among one’s peers. But the temptations involved here are enormous, for intelligence can also be the source of pride. The great intellectual saints such as Augustine, Aquinas and Bellarmine  all knew that intellectual pride is an area that Satan has not neglected, refused accolades and honours, preferring instead to embrace humility and exalt divine authority and teaching above mere human reasoning. 

Ever see Pope Francis enjoy the adoration and other Vatican II popes get when they parade in their especially built vehicals in front of the flock whose faith they have destroyed?