Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Globalist plot removed Benedict XVI?  (Read 208 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: Globalist plot removed Benedict XVI? Vatican court case.
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 02:36:29 PM »
"... This one is safe. Hundreds of professionals were questioning B14's resignation, of course..."
Sorry, Correction - should read:"...questioning Benedict XVI's resignation,..."

Goes to show how much I follow N.O. Vatican life lol.
I also am waiting for a cataract surgery, but so few of those surgeons found in Canada, esp here, where it snowed yesterday btw, in the middle of vast plains. ;)

  This interview brings to the viewer references that Pope B16 was quite 'conservative' and that the elite were secretly conniving to get replace him. She explains about 6 topics that didn't mesh with Nεw w0rId 0rdεr 2030, which were quite valid.

  Yet, he was quite a Modernist, you can't deny that.
+F appreciated him, no?  I remember the SSPX narrative that B. XVI was essentially traditional...and our local priest didn't agree with that idea.
***********


AI Translation from Italian.
Throwing in a quote from B14,  who wrote this:
https://www.vatican.va/content/benedictus-xiv/it/docuмents/enciclica--i-gravissimum-supremi---i--8-settembre-1745--il-ponte.html

"...10. Finally, it can be said that this remedy that aims to correct the vices of the people is not new, neither uncertain nor invented by Us. It is an ancient remedy, very suitable for healing evils and perhaps unique, since so many Bishops distinguished by their piety used it with great use in their Dioceses. We ourselves have tried it many times, and also you who have undoubtedly re-educated the People entrusted to you with the Sacred Missions.

11. But for this remedy not to lack its effectiveness, one must pray much to God because “not whoever plants is someone, nor who irrigates..., who makes God grow” (1 Cor 3:7). So you have to choose Missionaries eminent by doctrine and who educate people with care.

 This also happens now by the work and virtue of the Oblates, whom he instituted, and which are called “of St. Ambrose.” In fact, in addition to the rest, they prescribed this: not to bring inconvenience  to anyone and not to be pushed by any reason to take anything as a gift, as we clearly learn from the Acts of the Church of Milan (printed in 1599, par. 5, p. 841). Turn your thoughts to St. John Chrysostom, who in Homily 46 above Matthew says that the whole world was brought by the Apostles from error to truth, from the old superstition to embrace Christian truth, not because they had called the dead to new life, but because they had freed their souls from all passion and avarice: “What, in fact, makes them appear great? The contempt of money, of glory, the exemption from all the worries of life; if they had not had this, even if they had raised the dead, not only would they not have benefited anyone, but they would have been judged cheaters” (John Chrysostom, Om. 46 above Matthew)..."

ENCYCLICAL GRAVISSIMUM SUPREME OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF
BENEDICT XIV
P A X .

Re: Globalist plot removed Benedict XVI?
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 05:44:07 PM »
Have not listened to this yet, but would not Pope Benedict be part of the globalist plot?  He was in no way orthodox.  If there is a plot within the Church to destroy the papacy, then what better scenario than to set up a "conservative" pope to be ousted by an absolute liberal like Francis? 
It is possible that he was kicked out of the "papacy" because he wasn't far-left enough to please the Jєωιѕн masters. 


Re: Globalist plot removed Benedict XVI?
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 06:50:17 PM »
Good to hear from you, Mr. Cassini.

The Jews don't always agree about eveything. I believe that, even though he was a Modernist, that Benedict-Ratzinger had some strong convictions about some things, and that he was persecuted because of it. The Jews that put him there were not happy with his performance, and decided that it was time for him to go, since he would not obey them on certain issues.


Re: Globalist plot removed Benedict XVI?
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 08:20:46 PM »
The people who rise to the top of powerful institutions, whether they be governments, corporations, NGOs, and churches tend to have
massive egos and are filled with pride. That's the reason they scheme, plot, and claw their way to the top because they adore the status it gives them. Think of Richard III. 
Of course, most are on a leash and are often groomed for the specific role they are expected to play. It's not uncommon I would expect for some to of them to push back now and again against those who have installed them into these positions. 
Obama was a good example, plucked from obscurity he owed the tribe for every success he enjoyed. I nevertheless think his sɛҳuąƖ and racial confusion coupled with his early marxist ideals caused him to foster a certain resentment towards his masters on occasion. 
i think there was one incident where he kept Netanyahu waiting over an hour to humiliate him. 
The ѕуηαgσgυє might not be happy about this uppity mulatto but they are pragmatists and saw Obama as being an ideal vessel to advance many aspects of their social agenda. 
In the case of Ratzinger there may have been some dispute regarding the Vatican bank and its money laundering operations that we will never know about. So, his removal had very likely nothing to do with his stance on Catholic doctrine. JPII made Bergoglio a cardinal, he and Ratzinger were fully aware of what they were getting and it was no threat to their modernist convictions. 

Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: Globalist plot removed Benedict XVI?
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 08:38:21 PM »
This whole thread is ridiculous. A pope can't be forced out or forced to resign. The same laws apply in the Vatican 2 church as in the Catholic Church in this regard. There is no way to remove a pope except for heresy, and they sure didn't want to use that one against Ratzinger because that would have exposed themselves.