Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: From the White House?  (Read 27934 times)

0 Members and 44 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline SkidRowCatholic

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 407
  • Reputation: +51/-18
  • Gender: Male
Re: From the White House?
« Reply #60 on: December 17, 2025, 03:41:56 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • You must be speaking of IVF, which many Catholics don't even understand.
    So...If Catholics don't understand it, then it doesn't matter - never happened :confused:

    Go back and read the whole thread. I already laid this all out in black and white.

    Its EVEN WORSE in the moral order then just straight up dismemberment.



    Pay attention here:



    I have said nothing that is not factually true.

    He is a great promoter of slaying innocent life among his many other PUBLIC crimes and now we can add (at the very least material), heresy of denying the Incarnation to the list as well.

    Neither his, nor any other person's ignorance in this matter is any excuse - it is all right there for them to learn if they cared. Actually Raymond Arroyo (EWTN) tried to clue him into the teaching with what was the most pathetic attempt at public correction I have ever witnessed at that Cardinals dinner, but Trump just looked at him like he was from outer space and said, "I didn't know that." Then he went on to claim to expand it more than any other President anyway. :facepalm:

    But again, we really could not expect anything more from a man of his caliber, morals, doctrine, background, outlook, etc. He is just another cog in their machine.

    Now, "trad" Catholics being unable to detect CRYSTAL CLEAR HERESY in the second paragraph of his supposed honoring the Immaculate Conception and then subsequently going on to put their feet in their mouths expressing how "B-E-A-U-T-I-F-U-L,  amazing, how lovely, etc." is where the real sham is because;

    A) They should have caught the error staring them RIGHT IN THE FACE and said something - (like NCR did).

    B) They should not expect the praises of God's Mother to come from the unfitting lips of nonbelievers who sanction the slaying of millions of human lives every year and so many other PUBLIC crimes and sins.

    C) And lastly, any simple acknowledgment of this error (concerning A or B) would suffice - but the pharisees out themselves with their abject hatred and contempt for correction. 

    I have said this all ad naseum above already, but then I saw your thread and I figured, "maybe here is someone who can actually learn something." So I thought it worth a shot.



    Offline Gray2023

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 3451
    • Reputation: +1910/-987
    • Gender: Female
    Re: From the White House?
    « Reply #61 on: December 17, 2025, 05:13:42 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Made the correction.

    Submitted the letter here.

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

    If we don't try, we don't know what God chooses to accomplish through His believers.

    Yes I know, maybe I am too optimistic, if I don't act this way, then I easily fall into despair. :cowboy:

    :pray::pray::pray::pray:
    Fatti Maschii, Parole Femine


    Online WorldsAway

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1354
    • Reputation: +891/-127
    • Gender: Male
    Re: From the White House?
    « Reply #62 on: December 18, 2025, 08:58:01 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • He is a great promoter of slaying innocent life among his many other PUBLIC crimes and now we can add (at the very least material), heresy of denying the Incarnation to the list as well.

    B) They should not expect the praises of God's Mother to come from the unfitting lips of nonbelievers who sanction the slaying of millions of human lives every year and so many other PUBLIC crimes and sins.
    It makes perfect sense that Trump and/or his administration would believe that God became man at Our Lord's Birth, precisely because they are A-OK with IVF (murder) and leaving abortion (murder) "up to the states".

    If God became man at the Incarnation..well, that means life begins at conception..and that means IVF is murder
    John 15:19  If you had been of the world, the world would love its own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.

    Offline SkidRowCatholic

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 407
    • Reputation: +51/-18
    • Gender: Male
    Re: From the White House?
    « Reply #63 on: December 18, 2025, 12:03:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It makes perfect sense that Trump and/or his administration would believe that God became man at Our Lord's Birth, precisely because they are A-OK with IVF (murder) and leaving abortion (murder) "up to the states".

    If God became man at the Incarnation..well, that means life begins at conception..and that means IVF is murder
    Right.

    And I didn't even go there. I could have, I saw that as well, and it could be hypothesized that actually was its INTENDED effect for liberals, while the glazed over starry-eyed Trumper Catholics would swallow the bait, hook-line-and-sinker and say, "How lovely!", "Beautiful, "Astonishing".

    But what matters more is that people who claim to be Catholic and support his statement recant support for his statement because it is objective material heresy (all his personal sins and intentions aside), if you claim to be Catholic - YOU CANNOT SUPPORT HIS STATEMENT - IT IS HERETICAL. Even crummy Novus Ordo NCR understands this and this shames all the "trad" Catholics who refuse to see it and remain intransigent. It is scandalous. And not just some ruffled-feather snowflake "scandal" like I said shit or piss or I showed a barf emoji - but actual scandal of the faithful by holding up support for a heretical statement as if it was some positive good because you decided he didn't mean it that way. This is truly disgusting and vile in every way - they should see and know better.

    It neither honors the Immaculate Conception nor the Nativity (read what Dom Gueranger said about this).

    While we cannot be certain what his intention actually were, we can;

    Be CERTAIN he is pro-abort/IVF for millions of lives lost, millions of souls that will never see God face to face because of his sanctioned butchery and experimentation.
    Be CERTAIN he is NOT Catholic.
    Be CERTAIN he is a PUBLIC sinner.

    As to his internal forum and guilt before God - that is God's business not ours.

    So, yes we should pray for him, pray for your enemies, etc.

    But they should NOT support or draw attention to this heretical statement, as if it was a positive good.
    If you supported it and see this - simply retract your support and vindicate yourself from his objective crime.
    Stop quadrupling down and blowing it off like it doesn't matter because YOU DECIDED he didn't mean it that way - evaluate the actual objective statement - NOT what you think it means (Modernism much?)




    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1626
    • Reputation: +636/-127
    • Gender: Male
    Re: From the White House?
    « Reply #64 on: December 18, 2025, 12:13:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It makes perfect sense that Trump and/or his administration would believe that God became man at Our Lord's Birth, precisely because they are A-OK with IVF (murder) and leaving abortion (murder) "up to the states".

    If God became man at the Incarnation..well, that means life begins at conception..and that means IVF is murder

    And guess what religious group also shares that same Birth = Personhood belief?

    From Gemini AI:

    In the тαℓмυdic and broader Jєωιѕн legal tradition, the status of life is viewed as a gradual development rather than a single moment of "personhood" at conception. While the fetus is highly valued as potential life, it does not achieve the legal status of a full "person" (nefesh) until birth.

    The тαℓмυdic perspective generally breaks down into three distinct stages:

    1. The First 40 Days: "Mere Water"

    From conception until the 40th day of gestation, the тαℓмυd (specifically in Yevamot 69b) describes the embryo as maya b’alma, which translates to "mere water" or "mere fluid." During this initial period:

    • The embryo is not considered to have any independent status or human form.
    • In legal terms regarding inheritance or ritual purity, it is treated as though it does not yet exist as a distinct entity.

    2. 40 Days to Birth: "A Part of the Mother"

    After the 40th day and until the moment of birth, the fetus is considered a "potential life." However, it is legally defined as ubar yerech immo—literally, "the thigh of its mother."


    Part of the Body: The fetus is considered an integral part of the pregnant person's body, similar to an organ, rather than a separate person.

    Prioritizing the Mother: Because the fetus is "potential life" and the mother is an "existing life," Jєωιѕн law (Halakha) mandates that if the mother's life or health is at risk, her life takes absolute precedence.


    3. Birth: The Beginning of Personhood

    According to the Mishnah (Ohalot 7:6), full personhood (nefesh) is established only at the moment of birth.


    The Threshold: The тαℓмυd defines this moment as when the "greater part" of the body (or the head) emerges from the birth canal.

    The "First Breath": Many commentators link this to the "breath of life" mentioned in Genesis, suggesting that the soul (neshamah) fully enters the body with the first independent breath.

    Legal Equality: Only after this point is the baby considered a separate person with legal rights equal to the mother. At this stage, one life cannot be set aside for another.


    Summary Table: Status of Life in the тαℓмυd


    Stageтαℓмυdic TermStatus
    0–40 DaysMaya b’alma"Mere water"; no formal status.
    40 Days to BirthUbar yerech immoPart of the mother's body; potential life.
    Emergence (Birth)NefeshFull human personhood and legal rights.

    Quote
    Note on Viability: Historically, the тαℓмυd also mentions a 30-day period after birth where a child is not considered fully "viable" (ben kayama) until they have survived a month, though modern Jєωιѕн law treats newborns as full persons from the moment of birth due to advances in medical care.



    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13139
    • Reputation: +8283/-2564
    • Gender: Male
    Re: From the White House?
    « Reply #65 on: December 18, 2025, 12:15:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I read the letter as a very positive letter towards Our Lady and Christmas.  It wasn’t meant to be a doctrinal thesis nor an encyclical.  You expect too much.  

    Crazy expectations = suffering.  

    The perfect is the enemy of the good.  

    The letter wasn’t perfect but it was GOOD!

    Online WorldsAway

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1354
    • Reputation: +891/-127
    • Gender: Male
    Re: From the White House?
    « Reply #66 on: December 18, 2025, 12:32:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And guess what religious group also shares that same Birth = Personhood belief?

    From Gemini AI:

    In the тαℓмυdic and broader Jєωιѕн legal tradition, the status of life is viewed as a gradual development rather than a single moment of "personhood" at conception. While the fetus is highly valued as potential life, it does not achieve the legal status of a full "person" (nefesh) until birth.

    The тαℓмυdic perspective generally breaks down into three distinct stages:

    1. The First 40 Days: "Mere Water"

    From conception until the 40th day of gestation, the тαℓмυd (specifically in Yevamot 69b) describes the embryo as maya b’alma, which translates to "mere water" or "mere fluid." During this initial period:

    • The embryo is not considered to have any independent status or human form.
    • In legal terms regarding inheritance or ritual purity, it is treated as though it does not yet exist as a distinct entity.

    2. 40 Days to Birth: "A Part of the Mother"

    After the 40th day and until the moment of birth, the fetus is considered a "potential life." However, it is legally defined as ubar yerech immo—literally, "the thigh of its mother."


    Part of the Body: The fetus is considered an integral part of the pregnant person's body, similar to an organ, rather than a separate person.

    Prioritizing the Mother: Because the fetus is "potential life" and the mother is an "existing life," Jєωιѕн law (Halakha) mandates that if the mother's life or health is at risk, her life takes absolute precedence.


    3. Birth: The Beginning of Personhood

    According to the Mishnah (Ohalot 7:6), full personhood (nefesh) is established only at the moment of birth.


    The Threshold: The тαℓмυd defines this moment as when the "greater part" of the body (or the head) emerges from the birth canal.

    The "First Breath": Many commentators link this to the "breath of life" mentioned in Genesis, suggesting that the soul (neshamah) fully enters the body with the first independent breath.

    Legal Equality: Only after this point is the baby considered a separate person with legal rights equal to the mother. At this stage, one life cannot be set aside for another.


    Summary Table: Status of Life in the тαℓмυd


    Stageтαℓмυdic TermStatus
    0–40 DaysMaya b’alma"Mere water"; no formal status.
    40 Days to BirthUbar yerech immoPart of the mother's body; potential life.
    Emergence (Birth)NefeshFull human personhood and legal rights.
    Quite right! Jєωιѕн groups have actually said that banning abortion (child murder/sacrifice) violates their "religious freedom". They are honest at times 
    John 15:19  If you had been of the world, the world would love its own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.

    Offline SkidRowCatholic

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 407
    • Reputation: +51/-18
    • Gender: Male
    Re: From the White House?
    « Reply #67 on: December 18, 2025, 12:34:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I read the letter as a very positive letter towards Our Lady and Christmas.  It wasn’t meant to be a doctrinal thesis nor an encyclical.  You expect too much.

    The letter wasn’t perfect but it was GOOD!

    You are UNBELIEVABLE!

    No, you didn't "read the letter" you dolt!

    If you had actually paid attention to what you read then you would have seen RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE on the second paragraph and ENORMOUS CHRISTOLOGICAL HERESY GRINNING AT YOU, " "God became man when Mary gave birth to a son, Jesus," =  HERESY

    It isn't a good of ANY KIND AT ALL!

    Let me ask you this, What amount of heresy in something is acceptable to you to make it still "good"?

    The only unreal expectation I could be accused of holding is to think highly of you and your compatriots in this gaff and hope you would simply recant - and yes this has caused me some very, very, minor inconvienience - hardly a suffering I would say.


    It is your clear INDIFFERENCE to your public error of supporting his statement that I am pointing out to YOU in the hope of shaking you from your stupor of intransigence.


    Offline songbird

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5143
    • Reputation: +2025/-424
    • Gender: Female
    Re: From the White House?
    « Reply #68 on: December 18, 2025, 08:31:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Cera;  Trump deverted the funds from planned parenthood to susan b. Anthony, which is not pro-life.  Susan b. Anthony is for contraceptives and the abortion pill is in definition a contraceptive (emergency). They are for sterilization.  Title X funds are also going to crisis centers.  IUDs and such are abortifacients.

    Trump is not pro-life.  Catholic charities that is not being touched by trump is abortion and alphabet perverts.  

    Just rerouted funds.  no changes

    Offline Gray2023

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 3451
    • Reputation: +1910/-987
    • Gender: Female
    Re: From the White House?
    « Reply #69 on: December 18, 2025, 09:21:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You are UNBELIEVABLE!

    No, you didn't "read the letter" you dolt!

    If you had actually paid attention to what you read then you would have seen RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE on the second paragraph and ENORMOUS CHRISTOLOGICAL HERESY GRINNING AT YOU, " "God became man when Mary gave birth to a son, Jesus," =  HERESY

    It isn't a good of ANY KIND AT ALL!

    Let me ask you this, What amount of heresy in something is acceptable to you to make it still "good"?

    The only unreal expectation I could be accused of holding is to think highly of you and your compatriots in this gaff and hope you would simply recant - and yes this has caused me some very, very, minor inconvienience - hardly a suffering I would say.


    It is your clear INDIFFERENCE to your public error of supporting his statement that I am pointing out to YOU in the hope of shaking you from your stupor of intransigence.
    Then man up and try to correct the heresy in the briefing.  I sent a letter requesting the correction.  Did you?  It it is one thing to complain, it is another thing to do something about it.  It doesn't matter what the out come might be, you still have to do your due diligence.
    Fatti Maschii, Parole Femine