CathInfo.com

There is no reason a wife should not get 50% of what is jointly theirs,

That would be a fair judgment.  The problem we're trying to avoid is the civil divorce process, whereby woman are NORMALLY awarded MUCH MORE THAN 50%.  Any judgement in favor of the woman where she get's more than 50% is unjust and a prenup would help (but not guarantee) fairness.  That's all i'm asking for.

Further, the children are his and he has a moral obligation to support them.

If the wife receives 50% then that is part of his support.  She doesn't get 50% + child support.  That's unfair and what a prenup is supposed to avoid.

If he wishes to help out his children more in the future (which I'm sure he would want to, regardless of most of your rash judgements to the contrary) he has the freedom to do so AS HE PLEASES, WHEN HE PLEASES, and in the manner HE CHOOSES.  It's none of the damn court's/state's business.

And he can buy things DIRECTLY for his children, not be forced to give $ to his wife, who can then spend it on anything she wants.  (Do the courts monitor child support payments and make sure the wife uses the $ ONLY for the children?  Of course not, that would be anti-woman because we MUST trust her to do the right thing ALWAYS, especially when it comes to the children because she's a "loving" person and above reproach....even though she left her husband for frivolous reasons and has inflicted untold psychological damage on the children due to her selfishness...)

All of you can argue that a prenup would be pointless but you’d be ignoring reality and the fact that a good lawyer, who has experience in family court, can do a LOT to minimize the damage of false accusations and protect you from theft. 

If prenups were all that effective, there wouldn't be a MGTOW movement.  Men wouldn't be giving up on marriage to this extent if it were simple to avoid the injustice of the system.

That would be a fair judgment.  The problem we're trying to avoid is the civil divorce process, whereby woman are NORMALLY awarded MUCH MORE THAN 50%.  Any judgement in favor of the woman where she get's more than 50% is unjust and a prenup would help (but not guarantee) fairness.  That's all i'm asking for.If the wife receives 50% then that is part of his support.  She doesn't get 50% + child support.  That's unfair and what a prenup is supposed to avoid.

If he wishes to help out his children more in the future (which I'm sure he would want to, regardless of most of your rash judgements to the contrary) he has the freedom to do so AS HE PLEASES, WHEN HE PLEASES, and in the manner HE CHOOSES.  It's none of the damn court's/state's business.

And he can buy things DIRECTLY for his children, not be forced to give $ to his wife, who can then spend it on anything she wants.  (Do the courts monitor child support payments and make sure the wife uses the $ ONLY for the children?  Of course not, that would be anti-woman because we MUST trust her to do the right thing ALWAYS, especially when it comes to the children because she's a "loving" person and above reproach....even though she left her husband for frivolous reasons and has inflicted untold psychological damage on the children due to her selfishness...)

.
In my experiences here in TX, women get awarded much LESS than 50%.  If she is abused and leaves the house, the court awards the house to the husband because she abandoned the house...  the 50% divides the assests since the marriage began.  It has nothing to do with the children.
.
Regarding the children... If she is the primary caretaker of the children, and she earns less than the father (which is usually the case)  she most certainly SHOULD get child support from the father.  She should not have to support their children alone.  It is his moral duty to support his children.  It is not an option for him to choose.
.
It IS the courts business only because there are so many men who don't fulfill their moral obligation to their children.  It is the result of a godless society.
.
You act as though the child support from the husband is more than enough to pay for everything for his children with some left over for the mother to spend how she chooses.  This is not how it works.  Here in TX, the court determines how much, in their opinion, it takes to rear the children.  The father pays HALF that.  So the mother has to come up with the other half.
.
In some cases the father is awarded primary custody and the wife, if she makes more than the husband, has to pay child support.  It works both ways.
.
If either left and divorced for frivolous reasons, God will sort it out and the punishments will be severe.
.
Best to know as much as you can about a future spouse and not get led around by feelings.