Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Buenas Aires Eucharistic Miracle?  (Read 8409 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Buenas Aires Eucharistic Miracle?
« Reply #50 on: July 23, 2018, 12:38:11 AM »
Here is the Bishop Williamson's EC thread that discusses this matter:

https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/eleison-comments-cdxxxvi-(436)-nov-22-2015-a-d/msg478707/#msg478707
.
Is this what you're referring to?
.
https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/eleison-comments-cdxxxvi-(436)-nov-22-2015-a-d/msg478766/#msg478766
It is interesting that this is part of today's gospel reading:

For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect.

It appears that the so-called EM's at a NO service are deceiving the elect.   [+1]


To answer the poster above, I found this regading what ABL said about the New Mass:  [+2]

Archbishop Lefebvre did not hesitate to speak publicly on the question of the orthodoxy and validity of Paul VI’s Mass. He considered that “one cannot say generally that the New Mass is invalid or heretical”; however, “it leads slowly to heresy.”


Why would Christ confirm a service that "leads slowly to heresy"?  Also, regarding validity, the Church teaches that the Orthodox liturgy is "valid" but we never hear of EM's at Orthodox liturgies.  [+3]
.
If so, I have to admit that when it was simply stated all alone in this thread, it was much more impressive.
Because the other 3 topics mixed in the same post like this does, makes it lose its impact.
I might have read right through it and not have noticed.  Strange, but true!
.
Something else I just noticed: 
In the other thread you only quoted the second of 3 sentences, "For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect," but this time, you included all 3 of them and that's where the amazing effect comes from, all 3 sentences, in context, together in the same place:
.
“Then if any man shall say to you: Lo here is Christ, or there, do not believe him. For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Behold I have told it to you, beforehand” (Mt 24:23-25).

Re: Buenas Aires Eucharistic Miracle?
« Reply #51 on: July 23, 2018, 01:06:11 AM »
.
And another thing!
.
The Sunday you're pointing at was the 24th and Last Sunday After Pentecost in the traditional calendar, Nov. 22nd, 2015.
That year, Thanksgiving Day (USA) was Thursday, November 26th.
Sunday, November 29th, was the First Sunday of Advent, 2015.
.
Very interesting history in that: The Novus Ordo calendar almost never has the same Gospel, nor do they call that Sunday by the same name. In the change after 1962 when they came out with the new A, B and C cycles, the Gospel of Matthew from chapter 24 was only read once in 3 years, and they read it on a Sunday that was no longer referred to as the 24th after Pentecost because they said "Sundays in Ordinary Time," whatever that's supposed to mean. (The Ordinary of the Mass was no longer called that, either.)
.
Matthew 24 is ALWAYS read for the Gospel on the 24th and Last Sunday after Pentecost, every year. The only way it would be displaced in the traditional calendar would be if a MOVABLE FEAST of high rank were to fall on that day, and there are no movable feast days near that time on the calendar. In the 1962 updated calendar of John XXIII (which the 1962 Missal uses BTW, including CMRI who don't recognize John XXIII as a real pope -- go figure!) all the Sundays of the year always get John 1:1-14 read for the Last Gospel, however, in the traditional calendar, a displaced Gospel would be read as the Last Gospel instead of John 1:1-14 at the end of Mass, so you would still hear the Gospel of that Sunday even when it was displaced.
.
The Gospel in question is one of the parts of the Bible where the Novus Ordo facilitators would prefer we forget all about them.
.
Here is a great explanation for why Newchurch doesn't like Matthew 24: it warns us about the coming of Newchurch!
.
Thank you, 2Vermont, for bringing this into clear focus! Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!!!


Re: Buenas Aires Eucharistic Miracle?
« Reply #52 on: July 23, 2018, 01:27:54 AM »
.
.
And another thing -- when they moved the Tabernacles off the altars, some went into janitor closets -- I know this for a fact because I was told I had to move one there, and I refused, and I lost my job -- the Scripture says, "If therefore they say to you, ... behold he is in the closets, believe it not" (Mt. 24:26). "But for the sake of the elect, those days shall be shortened" (v. 22).

Re: Buenas Aires Eucharistic Miracle?
« Reply #53 on: July 23, 2018, 01:53:28 AM »
.
I finally figured out what you mean by EM, I thought it was Extraordinary Minister. (meaning extraordinary eucharistic minister)
.
Now, After reading a few pages from the 2015 liked thread, I see it had been Eucharistic Miracle. But I have seen EM used for Extraordinary Minister many times. Think about it. In Newchurch, EMs are the topic of discussion all the time, and they're not talking about miracles. Furthermore, there is a Resistance website run by a Catholic man who goes by Ecclesia Militans, and many users refer to him as "EM." You have to be careful with abbreviations like this, they can be very frustrating.
.
When Fish Eaters was a topic of discussion it got to be confusing what someone was saying when they wrote FE: it could be read Fish Eaters, instead of flat-earth. Now that FE is practically a dead letter it's not so confusing anymore. 

Re: Buenas Aires Eucharistic Miracle?
« Reply #54 on: July 23, 2018, 02:46:36 AM »
.
.
And another thing -- when they moved the Tabernacles off the altars, some went into janitor closets -- I know this for a fact because I was told I had to move one there, and I refused, and I lost my job -- the Scripture says, "If therefore they say to you, ... behold he is in the closets, believe it not" (Mt. 24:26). "But for the sake of the elect, those days shall be shortened" (v. 22).
I think we need some new rabble rousing nuns. Nuns who will rabble rouse for the tabernacle to be front and center.