Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Allow autists on the internet?  (Read 15411 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Allow autists on the internet?
« Reply #55 on: December 19, 2025, 10:42:32 AM »
The OP was advocating for government and community censorship of "autists" who he characterized as abnormal and incapable of making sound moral judgments.  Plus he violated forum rules by pretending to be a woman.  What a coincidence that someone flaunting forum rules wanted someone else to be banned because they were supposedly incapable of lawful and moral behavior.  You seem to know a lot about his motives.  How do you know he attends a large TLM parish?  It's almost as if you know this gender-fluid troll.
I was wondering how Matthew discovered beyond doubt he was lying about his gender. 

No I don’t know who he/she is. 

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Allow autists on the internet?
« Reply #56 on: December 19, 2025, 10:44:07 AM »
Are you sure the post is an attack on someone? The OP said they had some problems within their family with autistic people. No idea why someone would pretend to be female on here if they’re male. Perhaps they don’t want anyone to guess who they are in real life… if part of a large TLM parish for example..??

Well, it's undoubtedly the same individual ... due to a similar, very negative and hostile tone, nearly identical writing style, and this borderline-obsession with autism.  Whether this thread was intended to be an attack, I do think that it's quite possible, or else it's certainly at leat part of why this thread was started, to go after me ... since you'll notice other comments he made on this thread here, not directly related to autism, that were similar to the attacks he me against me there.  At the end of the day, I am not bothered by what people think ... since only what God knows and thinks ultimately matters ... except to the extent that it could be a reflection of something I need to correct or work on.  Sometimes the impression people get is a tad artificial, since my writing style is also very terse, to the point, very direct ... and so people sometimes read hostility into it, where I honestly have none.  I do get very hostile to BAD IDEAS, to ERROR, to TERRIBLE ARGUMENTS, to LOGICAL FALLACIES ... but it's never personal.  Sean Johnson and I used to go at it like nobody's business, but we're very friendly otherwise, and neither of us has any hard feelings.

Since this girlytrad was undoubtedy also that other individual, there was just a very disturbing level of spite, contempt, lack of any compassion or empathy in the individual's posts, both on that thread, and on this one ... a huge reason that I realized that there's no way this is a woman.  Yes, women can also get "catty", but not woman would just be this cold and, honestly, "mean" and lacking in empathy.


Re: Allow autists on the internet?
« Reply #57 on: December 19, 2025, 10:48:56 AM »
As part of banning online anonymity, everyone should be not only given an IQ test but a DNA test to determine their biological sex and ethnic background prior to issuing their internet license.  And that information should be in the public domain.  And internet licenses should be cost prohibitive to weed out those more likely to be "abnormal" such as the poor.

I also think Congress should lead this effort by holding hearings to define what is normal and what isn't.  Of course, IQ and ethnic identity should be part of defining normal.  But Thomas Massie would have to be excluded since he has Aspies.
That’s the most Americanism I’ve ever read and some how the least American thing I’ve ever read in one short paragraph 😵‍💫🤦🏼‍♂️ those who give the liscence can take the liscence just as easily, if you think you will be allowed to keep one your in a dream world! White ✅ trad ✅ straight ✅ = doomed hahaha. You nut! You’re a fascist, bigot, racist, homophobe, antisemite,  on and on and on and on. Why do people trust the government to have any power let alone to police the internet? Keep thinking putting more power in the government’s hand will come out favorably to us. Good luck. Drivers license, car registration, gun liscence, gun registration, let’s just throw in internet liscence, computer registration and open up a whole new system of control to bite us! Sounds great! Remember “ driving your car is a privilege, not a right!” Apparently sharing and receiving information is too! 

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Allow autists on the internet?
« Reply #58 on: December 19, 2025, 10:49:35 AM »
Not all women have empathy. Maybe she’s got a cluster B personality disorder. Psychopaths don’t have empathy I’m told.

Oh, they all have some, and even if their emotions have been worn down, and that natural tendency manifests itself at least as vestiges in their writing style.  It affects their thought process, their manner of expression, in a habitual way.  There's no way a woman could have posted the OP, even IF psycopathic ... just due tot he writing style, tone, thought process.  There would be some hints of the fact of her being a woman.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Allow autists on the internet?
« Reply #59 on: December 19, 2025, 10:57:45 AM »
No, I will not reveal my method(s) so as to allow future violators to refine their tactics.

You will just have to wonder. Cope and seethe.