Author Topic: THE CASE AGAINST FATHER FEENEY (Read 17607 times)

stevusmagnus · « **on:** October 02, 2009, 02:10:59 AM »

http://matt1618.freeyellow.com/desire.html

Jehanne · « **Reply #1 on:** October 02, 2009, 06:43:18 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

http://matt1618.freeyellow.com/desire.html

Only for catechumens, no one else whatsoever. Show me a single Catholic source prior to 1800 that said that a non-Catholic could be saved without Baptism.

Belloc · « **Reply #2 on:** October 02, 2009, 07:23:15 AM »

I often wonder of Feeney were alive today,would he be appaled at the cult-like status he has achieved.... :reporter:

SJB · « **Reply #3 on:** October 02, 2009, 07:28:49 AM »

Quote from: Jehanne

Quote from: stevusmagnus
http://matt1618.freeyellow.com/desire.html

Only for catechumens, no one else whatsoever. Show me a single Catholic source prior to 1800 that said that a non-Catholic could be saved without Baptism.

So you're not a hard core feeneyite. And the sacrament of Baptism is NOT REQUIRED in EVERY case. Catechumens are NOT yet recieved the Sacrament.

Vladimir · « **Reply #4 on:** October 02, 2009, 08:03:56 AM »

Quote from: Jehanne

Quote from: stevusmagnus
http://matt1618.freeyellow.com/desire.html

Only for catechumens, no one else whatsoever. Show me a single Catholic source prior to 1800 that said that a non-Catholic could be saved without Baptism.

I agree.

I think that Fr. Feeney said he doesn't know where unbaptised catechumens go if they die.