Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy  (Read 32490 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
« Reply #70 on: February 05, 2021, 11:07:12 AM »
Fr Feeney never mentions St Thomas, nor invincible ignorance, nor Valentinian.  You are putting words in his mouth, then objecting to his imagined words.  You make no sense.
You are just ignorant of Fr. Feeney's teachings.

Baptism of water absolutely needed , p. 330 ("Reply to a Liberal", by Raymond Karam, published in , Spring, 1949-- according to page 274 of : "Father Feeney supervised and gave his final approval to 'Reply to a Liberal' by Raymond Karam. '": "The only remedy against original sin is baptism, and all those whom God predestined to salvation, He draws them to this remedy. All the children who die unbaptized and all the adults who die ignorant of baptism, or who, having been drawn to it by God's Providence, refuse it, are not predestinate, but will perish eternally".

Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
« Reply #71 on: February 05, 2021, 11:10:18 AM »
Again, Fr. Feeney was an obstinate heretic who had Calvinistic leanings and was condemned along with his positions by the Church.

Anyone who follows him is condemned as well just as is the case with those who follow any other leader of heresy.


Online Stubborn

  • Supporter
Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
« Reply #72 on: February 05, 2021, 11:43:07 AM »
You are just ignorant of Fr. Feeney's teachings.

Baptism of water absolutely needed...
Same as Trent, who say if anyone says the sacraments are not necessary for salvation but superfluous, let him be anathema. You say the sacraments are superfluous and not necessary for salvation, so you are the one who is anathema.

You imply that you know the things Fr. Feeney taught, which means that there's one thing for certain, you cannot plead ignorance. Fr. Feeney taught the exact same things Trent taught.  

Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
« Reply #73 on: February 05, 2021, 11:45:45 AM »
Same as Trent, who say if anyone says the sacraments are not necessary for salvation but superfluous, let him be anathema. You say the sacraments are superfluous and not necessary for salvation, so you are the one who is anathema.

You imply that you know the things Fr. Feeney taught, which means that there's one thing for certain, you cannot plead ignorance. Fr. Feeney taught the exact same things Trent taught.  
Fr. Feeney was a heretic and you are a heretic on top of being a schismatic buffoon who continously interprets Trent contrary to the Church.

Online Stubborn

  • Supporter
Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
« Reply #74 on: February 05, 2021, 11:52:10 AM »
Again, Fr. Feeney was an obstinate heretic who had Calvinistic leanings and was condemned along with his positions by the Church.
Really? Because he taught and defended the EENS dogma he's an obstinate heretic? You're simply another dishonest BODer who has nothing, so you shoot your spit wads at a deceased, courageous priest and theologian. At least being a legend in your own mind you certainly can't plead ignorance.

Always remember that it is a defined dogma at Trent that the sacrament is necessary for salvation and without the sacrament men cannot be justified, not only that, but men cannot even be justified without the desire for the sacrament. To say that without the sacrament or the desire for the sacrament that men can be justified by faith alone as you keep saying, is, you guessed it, condemned with anathema.