Very clear indeed.
________________________
CHAPTER IV. A description is introduced of the Justification of the impious, and of the manner thereof under the law of grace.
By which words, a description of the Justification of the impious is indicated, – as being a translation, from that state wherein man is born a child of the first Adam, to the state of grace, and of the adoption of the sons of God, through the second Adam, Jesus Christ, our Savior. And this translation, since the promulgation of the Gospel, cannot be effected, without the laver of regeneration, or the desire thereof, as it is written; unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God.
__________________________
Also, I like it how the Feeneyites say that the common teachings of the theologians failed so soon after the Council of Trent, and even the Catechism of the Council of Trent failed, despite having St. Charles Borromeo as overseer of the catechism! I suppose St. Ambrose, Innocent III, and St. Thomas Aquinas failed as well, just being mere theologians! What a bunch of incompetents and Fr. Feeney was there to correct us all!:facepalm:
Not a Feeneyite. I'm a Catholic.
Theologians speculating on very specific, and restrictive, matters on BoD is not a wider teaching by the Church. Ss. Alphonsus and Thomas holding an opinion on whether a catechumen can get to heaven without water baptism is leagues different from Trad Bishops and Priests preaching that a Jєω, Muslim, or pagan can get to heaven without water baptism.
Secondly, your reading comprehension is terrible. You have to use water and there has to be a desire for the Sacrament in order for it to be efficacious. Each of there parts in themselves do not connect a Sacrament. You can't force something to be baptized if they have no desire; and conversely, you have no Sacrament if only the desire is present but no water is used.