Author Topic: Fr. hαɾɾιson corrects The Wanderer for their misinterpretation of EENS (Read 13327 times)

SJB · « **Reply #105 on:** March 07, 2011, 06:27:09 PM »

Quote

You mean you've never heard of the two natures of the Church. That She is both human (human element) and Divine. You seem to be making yourself purposely obtuse in this matter.

Quote your source. I'd like to see it.

Quote

As to the Arians, prior to the Council of Nicea, should those who fought Arianism, instead have been "at peace etc" and waited until the Council condemned Arius and his heresy.

I didn't say make peace with heretics. You're the one who thinks heretics are still Catholics.

Lighthouse · « **Reply #106 on:** March 07, 2011, 06:46:51 PM »

Ah, let me understand this. So when the majority of northern Europeans and the British Isle decided to adopt Protestantism were they still Catholic? Just the bad-boy human division of the Church?

LM · « **Reply #107 on:** March 07, 2011, 07:30:33 PM »

Quote from: SJB

Quote
You mean you've never heard of the two natures of the Church. That She is both human (human element) and Divine. You seem to be making yourself purposely obtuse in this matter.

Quote your source. I'd like to see it.

Quote
As to the Arians, prior to the Council of Nicea, should those who fought Arianism, instead have been "at peace etc" and waited until the Council condemned Arius and his heresy.

I didn't say make peace with heretics. You're the one who thinks heretics are still Catholics.

You are human are you not. Are you a member of the Church, part of Her? Would the Church exist if She had no human members? Would the Church exist without Her Divine Truth?

You said until a condemnation comes down, to be at peace. If a person is confronted with heresy (which has not yet been officially condemned) and you didn't mean it to make peace with heretics, what do you consider to be "at peace".

As to the Arians, were the Arians members of the Church prior to Nicea setting to paper the nature of Christ and condemning the heresy.

SJB · « **Reply #108 on:** March 07, 2011, 08:13:18 PM »

So you don't have a source. Is that right?

LM · « **Reply #109 on:** March 07, 2011, 08:16:18 PM »

Quote from: SJB

So you don't have a source. Is that right?

So can you answer the questions?

SJB · « **Reply #110 on:** March 07, 2011, 08:19:24 PM »

Quote from: LM

Quote from: SJB
So you don't have a source. Is that right?

So can you answer the questions?

That's what I thought.

LM · « **Reply #111 on:** March 07, 2011, 08:20:40 PM »

Quote from: SJB

Quote from: LM
Quote from: SJB
So you don't have a source. Is that right?

So can you answer the questions?

That's what I thought.

Apparently you can't think to answer the questions.

SJB · « **Reply #112 on:** March 07, 2011, 08:24:29 PM »

Quote from: LM

Quote from: SJB
Quote from: LM
Quote from: SJB
So you don't have a source. Is that right?

So can you answer the questions?

That's what I thought.

Apparently you can't think to answer the questions.

No, I think you don't have any source and you are just making things up.

LM · « **Reply #113 on:** March 07, 2011, 08:32:22 PM »

Quote from: SJB

Quote from: LM
Quote from: SJB
Quote from: LM
Quote from: SJB
So you don't have a source. Is that right?

So can you answer the questions?

That's what I thought.

Apparently you can't think to answer the questions.

No, I think you don't have any source and you are just making things up.

You should have no problem answering the questions.