Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire  (Read 16308 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 2Vermont

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11528
  • Reputation: +6476/-1195
  • Gender: Female
Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
« Reply #45 on: August 12, 2014, 07:00:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: JohnAnthonyMarie
    Quote from: GJC
    Quote from: JohnAnthonyMarie


    Quote from: Pope Pius IX
    There are, of course, those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts, and nature of all, his supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishments.


    Just for clarity, would you please tell me what you believe Pope Pius IX is saying here?

    Not trying to call you out but it would be interesting to have everyone commenting on this thread to state what there understanding of this paragraph is.

    No comments about what others say, just their own simple understanding.

    After you answer the question I would be more than happy to go second.

    Note: Let us use the correct translation



    Thank you.  It is refreshing to to read a honest reply.

    What I believe this is saying.  In context, Pope Pius IX is writing about "The Promotion of False Doctrines", a "sacrilegious war brought upon the Catholic Church".

    Quote

     "7. Here, too, our beloved sons and venerable brothers, it is again necessary to mention and censure a very grave error entrapping some Catholics who believe that it is possible to arrive at eternal salvation although living in error and alienated from the true faith and Catholic unity. Such belief is certainly opposed to Catholic teaching. There are, of course, those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts, and nature of all, his supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishments."


    Here above, in my opinion, the pope is clearly addressing an issue, that there are "some Catholics" who believe " it is possible to arrive at eternal salvation" while "living in error and alienated from the true faith and Catholic unity", which he identifies as "certainly opposed to Catholic teaching."  Clear enough. The next half of this paragraph is in relation to the first, as he continues to address the issue, identifying that there are people "struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion", with a qualification that these people are "Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives" and Pope Pius IX states in no uncertain terms that they "are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace."  Continuing, "Because God knows, searches and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts, and nature of all, his supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishments."

    So, in summary, from this single paragraph, I am assured of two, mutually inclusive things, 1. that it is not possible to arrive at eternal salvation alienated from the true faith and Catholic unity, and 2. that God, by His divine light and grace,  may allow someone who is ignorant in certain terms of our Holy religion to attain eternal life.

    Quote
       "8. Also well known is the Catholic teaching that no one can be saved outside the Catholic Church. Eternal salvation cannot be obtained by those who oppose the authority and statements of the same Church and are stubbornly separated from the unity of the Church and also from the successor of Peter, the Roman Pontiff, to whom 'the custody of the vineyard has been committed by the Savior.'(Ecuмenical Council of Chalcedon in its letter to Pope Leo.) The words of Christ are clear enough: 'If he refuses to listen even to the Church, let him be to you a Gentile and a tax collector;'(Mt 15.17.) 'He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you, rejects me, and he who rejects me, rejects him who sent me;'(Lk 10.16.) 'He who does not believe will be condemned;'(Mk 16.16.) 'He who does not believe is already condemned;'(Jn 3.18.) 'He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters.'(Lk 11.23.) The Apostle Paul says that such persons are 'perverted and self-condemned;'(Ti 3.11.) the Prince of the Apostles calls them 'false teachers . . . who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master. . . bringing upon themselves swift destruction.'(2 Pt 2.1.) "





    Agreed tot he bolded.  I'm still not sure if I understand where he stands on this topic, but he comes across as a man of good will.  I think I'll be enjoying reading his posts.

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4579/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #46 on: August 12, 2014, 07:29:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam


    There are no "non-Catholics saved in invincible ignorance" Canterella. If you say this you deny infallible dogma. Those in invincible ignorance must accept the Catholic Faith before they die. They must also be perfectly contrite for their sins. God can give them these graces without water baptism. They must, however, cooperate. You are confusing the doctrine of EENS with the doctrine Baptism of Desire.  


    Exactly, the obligation to receive the Sacraments still remains for this hypothetical invincible ignorant. God can and will ensure that His chosen souls, his Elect, do not die without receiving the sacraments needed for salvation, for God is omnipotent and cannot deceive or be deceived.  

    However, according to Catholic dogma, what has been revealed to us is that this hypothetical invincible ignorant cannot be saved until he explicitly converts to Catholicism. It is precisely under this indispensable premise that the great Missionary works of evangelizers such as Francis Xavier were based upon.
     
    According to doctrine, this hypothetical invincible ignorant would not be guilty of heresy or infidelity, but only original and actual sins, which uniquely the sacraments of Baptism and Penance can remit. These sacraments are dispensed solely by the Roman Catholic Church. The invincible ignorant would not be saved on account of original sin, at the very least.

    St. Thomas himself explained that those who die invincibly ignorant, who have heard nothing about the Faith through no fault of their own are still damned for their sins, including original sin, which cannot be taken away without Baptism and the Faith.

    The Roman Catholic Church infallibly defined at the ecuмenical councils of Lyons and Florence, that the guilt of original sin suffices for damnation.

    Quote from: Florence

    “The souls of those who die in mortal sin or with original sin only, however, immediately descend to hell, to be punished moreover with disparate punishments. […] They will go into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels.”

    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Offline Ad Jesum per Mariam

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 259
    • Reputation: +32/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #47 on: August 12, 2014, 09:13:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Cantarella
    Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam


    There are no "non-Catholics saved in invincible ignorance" Canterella. If you say this you deny infallible dogma. Those in invincible ignorance must accept the Catholic Faith before they die. They must also be perfectly contrite for their sins. God can give them these graces without water baptism. They must, however, cooperate. You are confusing the doctrine of EENS with the doctrine Baptism of Desire.  


    Exactly, the obligation to receive the Sacraments still remains for this hypothetical invincible ignorant. God can and will ensure that His chosen souls, his Elect, do not die without receiving the sacraments needed for salvation, for God is omnipotent and cannot deceive or be deceived.


     
    Here is what you said Canterella: "The Catholic Church teaches infallibly that all non Catholics with no exception on earth need to enter the Church formally, explicitly for salvation "and if there are any non Catholics EVER saved in invincible ignorance will be known ONLY to God[/u]."

    You are extremely confused Canterella. You said plainly that it is possible for non-Catholics to be saved in their ignorance. This means you are saying they can be saved without baptism or explicit or implicit desire for baptism. Non-Catholics are not "saved" on Earth or in Heaven. They must be Catholic Church members at least by desire to be "saved."

    Offline Ad Jesum per Mariam

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 259
    • Reputation: +32/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #48 on: August 12, 2014, 09:26:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Cantarella

    St. Thomas himself explained that those who die invincibly ignorant, who have heard nothing about the Faith through no fault of their own are still damned for their sins, including original sin, which cannot be taken away without Baptism and the Faith.


    I was not the one who said that the invincible ignorant could be "saved" in their ignorance. You did. They must receive baptism. If they are of the age of reason they can receive baptism in different ways (water, desire and blood).

    Quote from: Cantarella

    The Roman Catholic Church infallibly defined at the ecuмenical councils of Lyons and Florence, that the guilt of original sin suffices for damnation.

    Quote from: Florence

    “The souls of those who die in mortal sin or with original sin only, however, immediately descend to hell, to be punished moreover with disparate punishments. […] They will go into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels.”



    Baptism can be received more than one way Canterella. Desire for baptism, plus perfect charity and contrition for sin suffice to wipe away all sin (including original sin), excepting those below the age of reason.

    Offline JohnAnthonyMarie

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1297
    • Reputation: +603/-63
    • Gender: Male
      • TraditionalCatholic.net
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #49 on: August 12, 2014, 10:00:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Cantarella

    St. Thomas himself explained that those who die invincibly ignorant, who have heard nothing about the Faith through no fault of their own are still damned for their sins, including original sin, which cannot be taken away without Baptism and the Faith.

    Do you have a specific reference for the teaching you attribute to Saint Thomas Aquinas ?


    St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica,
    Quote
    Article 2. Whether a man can be saved without Baptism?

    Objection 1. It seems that no man can be saved without Baptism. For our Lord said (John 3:5): "Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter the kingdom of God." But those alone are saved who enter God's kingdom. Therefore none can be saved without Baptism, by which a man is born again of water and the Holy Ghost.

    Objection 2. Further, in the book De Eccl. Dogm. xli, it is written: "We believe that no catechumen, though he die in his good works, will have eternal life, except he suffer martyrdom, which contains all the sacramental virtue of Baptism." But if it were possible for anyone to be saved without Baptism, this would be the case specially with catechumens who are credited with good works, for they seem to have the "faith that worketh by charity" (Galatians 5:6). Therefore it seems that none can be saved without Baptism.

    Objection 3. Further, as stated above (1; 65, 4), the sacrament of Baptism is necessary for salvation. Now that is necessary "without which something cannot be" (Metaph. v). Therefore it seems that none can obtain salvation without Baptism.

    On the contrary, Augustine says (Super Levit. lxxxiv) that "some have received the invisible sanctification without visible sacraments, and to their profit; but though it is possible to have the visible sanctification, consisting in a visible sacrament, without the invisible sanctification, it will be to no profit." Since, therefore, the sacrament of Baptism pertains to the visible sanctification, it seems that a man can obtain salvation without the sacrament of Baptism, by means of the invisible sanctification.

    I answer that, The sacrament or Baptism may be wanting to someone in two ways. First, both in reality and in desire; as is the case with those who neither are baptized, nor wished to be baptized: which clearly indicates contempt of the sacrament, in regard to those who have the use of the free-will. Consequently those to whom Baptism is wanting thus, cannot obtain salvation: since neither sacramentally nor mentally are they incorporated in Christ, through Whom alone can salvation be obtained.

    Secondly, the sacrament of Baptism may be wanting to anyone in reality but not in desire: for instance, when a man wishes to be baptized, but by some ill-chance he is forestalled by death before receiving Baptism. And such a man can obtain salvation without being actually baptized, on account of his desire for Baptism, which desire is the outcome of "faith that worketh by charity," whereby God, Whose power is not tied to visible sacraments, sanctifies man inwardly. Hence Ambrose says of Valentinian, who died while yet a catechumen: "I lost him whom I was to regenerate: but he did not lose the grace he prayed for."

    Reply to Objection 1. As it is written (1 Samuel 16:7), "man seeth those things that appear, but the Lord beholdeth the heart." Now a man who desires to be "born again of water and the Holy Ghost" by Baptism, is regenerated in heart though not in body. thus the Apostle says (Romans 2:29) that "the circuмcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, not in the letter; whose praise is not of men but of God."

    Reply to Objection 2. No man obtains eternal life unless he be free from all guilt and debt of punishment. Now this plenary absolution is given when a man receives Baptism, or suffers martyrdom: for which reason is it stated that martyrdom "contains all the sacramental virtue of Baptism," i.e. as to the full deliverance from guilt and punishment. Suppose, therefore, a catechumen to have the desire for Baptism (else he could not be said to die in his good works, which cannot be without "faith that worketh by charity"), such a one, were he to die, would not forthwith come to eternal life, but would suffer punishment for his past sins, "but he himself shall be saved, yet so as by fire" as is stated 1 Corinthians 3:15.

    Reply to Objection 3. The sacrament of Baptism is said to be necessary for salvation in so far as man cannot be saved without, at least, Baptism of desire; "which, with God, counts for the deed" (Augustine, Enarr. in Ps. 57).



    Omnes pro Christo


    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4579/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #50 on: August 12, 2014, 10:06:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • St. Thomas explained that those who die invincibly ignorant, who have heard nothing about the Faith through no fault of their own are still damned for their sins, including original sin, which cannot be taken away without the Faith. They are not saved and God does not prevent this by sending them a missionary (even an angel if necessary). This is the place of invincible ignorance, simply an adequate means towards the selection of the elect and the completion of the universe.

    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4579/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #51 on: August 12, 2014, 10:07:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: st. Thomas

    “Unbelief has a double sense.  First, it can be taken purely negatively; thus a man is called an unbeliever solely because he does not possess faith.  Secondly, by way of opposition to faith; thus when a man refuses to hear of the faith or even contemns it, according to Isaiah, “Who has believed our report?”  This is where the full nature of unbelief, properly speaking is found, and where the sin lies.

    If, however, unbelief be taken just negatively, as in those who have heard nothing about the faith, it bears the character, not of fault, but of penalty, because their ignorance of divine things is the result of the sin of our first parents. Those who are unbelievers in this sense are condemned on account of other sins, which cannot be forgiven without faith; they are not condemned for the sin of unbelief.”
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline JohnAnthonyMarie

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1297
    • Reputation: +603/-63
    • Gender: Male
      • TraditionalCatholic.net
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #52 on: August 12, 2014, 10:13:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: JohnAnthonyMarie


    St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica,
    Quote
    Article 2. Whether a man can be saved without Baptism?

    Objection 1. It seems that no man can be saved without Baptism. For our Lord said (John 3:5): "Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter the kingdom of God." But those alone are saved who enter God's kingdom. Therefore none can be saved without Baptism, by which a man is born again of water and the Holy Ghost.

    Objection 2. Further, in the book De Eccl. Dogm. xli, it is written: "We believe that no catechumen, though he die in his good works, will have eternal life, except he suffer martyrdom, which contains all the sacramental virtue of Baptism." But if it were possible for anyone to be saved without Baptism, this would be the case specially with catechumens who are credited with good works, for they seem to have the "faith that worketh by charity" (Galatians 5:6). Therefore it seems that none can be saved without Baptism.

    Objection 3. Further, as stated above (1; 65, 4), the sacrament of Baptism is necessary for salvation. Now that is necessary "without which something cannot be" (Metaph. v). Therefore it seems that none can obtain salvation without Baptism.

    On the contrary, Augustine says (Super Levit. lxxxiv) that "some have received the invisible sanctification without visible sacraments, and to their profit; but though it is possible to have the visible sanctification, consisting in a visible sacrament, without the invisible sanctification, it will be to no profit." Since, therefore, the sacrament of Baptism pertains to the visible sanctification, it seems that a man can obtain salvation without the sacrament of Baptism, by means of the invisible sanctification.

    I answer that, The sacrament or Baptism may be wanting to someone in two ways. First, both in reality and in desire; as is the case with those who neither are baptized, nor wished to be baptized: which clearly indicates contempt of the sacrament, in regard to those who have the use of the free-will. Consequently those to whom Baptism is wanting thus, cannot obtain salvation: since neither sacramentally nor mentally are they incorporated in Christ, through Whom alone can salvation be obtained.

    Secondly, the sacrament of Baptism may be wanting to anyone in reality but not in desire: for instance, when a man wishes to be baptized, but by some ill-chance he is forestalled by death before receiving Baptism. And such a man can obtain salvation without being actually baptized, on account of his desire for Baptism, which desire is the outcome of "faith that worketh by charity," whereby God, Whose power is not tied to visible sacraments, sanctifies man inwardly. Hence Ambrose says of Valentinian, who died while yet a catechumen: "I lost him whom I was to regenerate: but he did not lose the grace he prayed for."

    Reply to Objection 1. As it is written (1 Samuel 16:7), "man seeth those things that appear, but the Lord beholdeth the heart." Now a man who desires to be "born again of water and the Holy Ghost" by Baptism, is regenerated in heart though not in body. thus the Apostle says (Romans 2:29) that "the circuмcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, not in the letter; whose praise is not of men but of God."

    Reply to Objection 2. No man obtains eternal life unless he be free from all guilt and debt of punishment. Now this plenary absolution is given when a man receives Baptism, or suffers martyrdom: for which reason is it stated that martyrdom "contains all the sacramental virtue of Baptism," i.e. as to the full deliverance from guilt and punishment. Suppose, therefore, a catechumen to have the desire for Baptism (else he could not be said to die in his good works, which cannot be without "faith that worketh by charity"), such a one, were he to die, would not forthwith come to eternal life, but would suffer punishment for his past sins, "but he himself shall be saved, yet so as by fire" as is stated 1 Corinthians 3:15.

    Reply to Objection 3. The sacrament of Baptism is said to be necessary for salvation in so far as man cannot be saved without, at least, Baptism of desire; "which, with God, counts for the deed" (Augustine, Enarr. in Ps. 57).




    Do you somehow disagree?
    Omnes pro Christo


    Offline JohnAnthonyMarie

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1297
    • Reputation: +603/-63
    • Gender: Male
      • TraditionalCatholic.net
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #53 on: August 12, 2014, 10:28:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Can someone please queue the Jeopardy music?
    Omnes pro Christo

    Offline JohnAnthonyMarie

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1297
    • Reputation: +603/-63
    • Gender: Male
      • TraditionalCatholic.net
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #54 on: August 12, 2014, 10:46:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • While we are enjoying this moment of silence...
    Omnes pro Christo

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14781
    • Reputation: +6104/-912
    • Gender: Male
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #55 on: August 13, 2014, 04:58:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: JohnAnthonyMarie
    Quote from: JohnAnthonyMarie


    St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica,
    Quote
    Article 2. Whether a man can be saved without Baptism?

    Objection 1. It seems that no man can be saved without Baptism. For our Lord said (John 3:5): "Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter the kingdom of God." But those alone are saved who enter God's kingdom. Therefore none can be saved without Baptism, by which a man is born again of water and the Holy Ghost.

    Objection 2. Further, in the book De Eccl. Dogm. xli, it is written: "We believe that no catechumen, though he die in his good works, will have eternal life, except he suffer martyrdom, which contains all the sacramental virtue of Baptism." But if it were possible for anyone to be saved without Baptism, this would be the case specially with catechumens who are credited with good works, for they seem to have the "faith that worketh by charity" (Galatians 5:6). Therefore it seems that none can be saved without Baptism.

    Objection 3. Further, as stated above (1; 65, 4), the sacrament of Baptism is necessary for salvation. Now that is necessary "without which something cannot be" (Metaph. v). Therefore it seems that none can obtain salvation without Baptism.

    On the contrary, Augustine says (Super Levit. lxxxiv) that "some have received the invisible sanctification without visible sacraments, and to their profit; but though it is possible to have the visible sanctification, consisting in a visible sacrament, without the invisible sanctification, it will be to no profit." Since, therefore, the sacrament of Baptism pertains to the visible sanctification, it seems that a man can obtain salvation without the sacrament of Baptism, by means of the invisible sanctification.

    I answer that, The sacrament or Baptism may be wanting to someone in two ways. First, both in reality and in desire; as is the case with those who neither are baptized, nor wished to be baptized: which clearly indicates contempt of the sacrament, in regard to those who have the use of the free-will. Consequently those to whom Baptism is wanting thus, cannot obtain salvation: since neither sacramentally nor mentally are they incorporated in Christ, through Whom alone can salvation be obtained.

    Secondly, the sacrament of Baptism may be wanting to anyone in reality but not in desire: for instance, when a man wishes to be baptized, but by some ill-chance he is forestalled by death before receiving Baptism. And such a man can obtain salvation without being actually baptized, on account of his desire for Baptism, which desire is the outcome of "faith that worketh by charity," whereby God, Whose power is not tied to visible sacraments, sanctifies man inwardly. Hence Ambrose says of Valentinian, who died while yet a catechumen: "I lost him whom I was to regenerate: but he did not lose the grace he prayed for."

    Reply to Objection 1. As it is written (1 Samuel 16:7), "man seeth those things that appear, but the Lord beholdeth the heart." Now a man who desires to be "born again of water and the Holy Ghost" by Baptism, is regenerated in heart though not in body. thus the Apostle says (Romans 2:29) that "the circuмcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, not in the letter; whose praise is not of men but of God."

    Reply to Objection 2. No man obtains eternal life unless he be free from all guilt and debt of punishment. Now this plenary absolution is given when a man receives Baptism, or suffers martyrdom: for which reason is it stated that martyrdom "contains all the sacramental virtue of Baptism," i.e. as to the full deliverance from guilt and punishment. Suppose, therefore, a catechumen to have the desire for Baptism (else he could not be said to die in his good works, which cannot be without "faith that worketh by charity"), such a one, were he to die, would not forthwith come to eternal life, but would suffer punishment for his past sins, "but he himself shall be saved, yet so as by fire" as is stated 1 Corinthians 3:15.

    Reply to Objection 3. The sacrament of Baptism is said to be necessary for salvation in so far as man cannot be saved without, at least, Baptism of desire; "which, with God, counts for the deed" (Augustine, Enarr. in Ps. 57).




    Do you somehow disagree?


    289 years after St. Thomas died, The Council of Trent disagreed and decreed infallibly that the sacraments are a necessity unto salvation (although not all sacraments are necessary for every individual) and that whoever says that the sacrament of baptism is optional, that is, not necessary for salvation, is anathema.

    Now 451 years later, you disagree with the council of Trent.

    Try to always remember that there is One Lord, One Faith and One Baptism, not three.

    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Offline Binechi

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2318
    • Reputation: +512/-40
    • Gender: Male
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #56 on: August 13, 2014, 06:21:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Church on Theologians

    Pope Benedict XIV, Apostolica (# 6), June 26 1749:  “The Church s judgment is preferable to that of a Doctor renowned for his holiness and teaching.”

    Pope Pius XII, Humani generis  (#21, Aug. 12. 1950:  “This deposit of faith our Divine Redeemer has given for authentic interpretation not to each of the faithful, not even to theologians, but only to the Teaching Authority of the Church .”



    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #57 on: August 13, 2014, 08:49:50 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here are the latest reasons I heard from the Feeneyites believe the Catholic teaching of BOD is wrong.

    1.  Because SVs believe it is true

    2.  Because someone watched TV seven years ago.

    I kid you not.

    Now here is the Catholic teaching which the Feeneyites ignore and wish away:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/211357956/Sources-of-Baptism-of-Blood-Baptism-of-Desire

    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4579/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #58 on: August 13, 2014, 10:53:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Director
    The Church on Theologians

    Pope Benedict XIV, Apostolica (# 6), June 26 1749:  “The Church s judgment is preferable to that of a Doctor renowned for his holiness and teaching.”

    Pope Pius XII, Humani generis  (#21, Aug. 12. 1950:  “This deposit of faith our Divine Redeemer has given for authentic interpretation not to each of the faithful, not even to theologians, but only to the Teaching Authority of the Church .”




    Even the Holy Mother Church Herself has no power to contradict or change in any way what Our Lord Christ said and taught when He came to earth. No bishop, no council, no pope, no saint, NO ONE, can change the essential matter or form of a Sacrament instituted by Our Lord. It is part of the Deposit of Faith.

    In several occasions the Magisterium of Holy Mother Church has positively declared that no one has the power to innovate anything whatsoever regarding the substance of the Sacraments (substance meaning matter (in this case, natural WATER, and form (words, as expressed in John 3:5).

    Quote from: St Pius X

    Pope : "It is well known that the Church there belongs no right whatsoever to innovate anything touching the substance of the Sacraments". Thus even the Church Herself has no power or authority to alter the words or matter in the form of the Sacrament of Baptism.  


    Quote from: Pius XII

    " As the Council of Trent teaches the seven sacraments  of the New Law have all been instituted by Jesus Christ, Our Lord, and the Church has no power over the "substance of the sacraments".

    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    Catholic (vs. Heretical) Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #59 on: August 13, 2014, 10:54:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So where did denials of BOB and BOD get their start? In the opening couple centuries of the Church this question seems to have never come up. And in the next several centuries several ancient Church Fathers mentioned both BOB and BOD, though there were some few who listed only the martyrs (BOB) as being any exception to the requirement to be baptized in water. And yet, through selective quotation many of them are made to seem as if they entertained a variety of different opinions about BOB and BOD among themselves. However, no useful quotes have been found (even out of context) to suggest that any of the most ancient Fathers were in any way aware of any such difference of opinion among themselves
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church