As for myself, I make a distinction ... between practice and principle. I'll treat those who have an NO annulment as if it was legit (given that I am not privy to the details) ... except that I might question it if prudence suggests an opportunity. I don't have any authority to impose my conscience on others. Of course, that doesn't stop me from holding in principle that the vast majority of NO annulments are bogus And yet, a friend told me something a number of years ago that gave me some pause to think. He mentioned that the vast majority of those who get married in the NO do not believe in the permanence of marriage (go in with the attitude of, "I'll give it a try, and if it does't work I can always get divorced." or else go into it deliberately planning on limiting children). That is probably true ... in which case they're just fornicators or adulterers (as the case may be). But the GROUNDS for NO to grant annulments are borderline absurd.