.
So, my hunch was correct, that she is not a traditional Catholic at all. Someone who says a priest knows nothing about marriage is basically saying the Catholic Church knows nothing about marriage. She does not have the Catholic Faith.
Unfortunately, at this point you really don't have any good options.
Meh, someone can say that in a relative sense, not an absolute sense. It's true that there are many ways in which a priest knows very little about the details of marriage. As with all things related to moral and pastoral theology (vs. dogmatic), there are the principles, and then almost more importantly the application of those principles to concrete situations.
While your "hunch" may have been correct in this case, it means nothing. There are just as many Traditional Catholics who might say (and have said) the same thing.
So, for instance, if I were a priest counseling a drug addict, I might know the moral theology principles regarding the immorality of drug use, and perhaps might know some theoretical stuff about dealing with additions, but on another level since I've never been hooked on drugs, one might rightly say that I know "nothing" about being addicted to drugs. I would not dispute that, nor would I consider someone who said that to be "non-Catholic".
Similarly, a priest would know "nothing" about what it's like to raise 6, 8, 10 children ... on one level. While the principles don't change, their application can, AND in some cases it can even become a question of not just raising 10 children but of raising THESE 10 children. In every family there can be wildly different dynamics depending on the mix of temperaments among the children, where some of them might have various different health conditions or mental challenges, etc. Even if I were raising 10 children, someone might rightly say that I know nothing about raising 10 children ... where 2 or 3 are autistic, and 1 even confined to a wheelchair where he must be spoon-fed, have his diapers changed, etc. (I've known one family in this situation and can't imainge how difficult it must be for them).
As I've seen so often here, far too many Trads don't understand that prudence is considered the queen of all the virtues for a very good reason, since it governs the practice of the other virtues. That's why some people feel some kind of absolute obligation to correct and rebuke every sinner they run into and get scrupulous if they don't ... not realizing that this obligation applies only under certain conditions and it can even be that in some circuмstances you'd be required NOT to rebuke the sinner (where it would do more harm toward their eventual conversion to rebuke them).