1) Staged terror events have been planned in the past and have been organized by intelligence agencies in cooperation with secret societies.  This is known.  The Israelis were caught red-handed in the Lavon Affair.  Operation Northwoods was a plan to fake an airline hijacking to blame on Cuba.  There were the bombings in Italy where fabricated evidence was planted by members of the P2 lodge.  No one is a "kook" for considering the likelihood that these events could be ongoing at this time in history.

Many people, even today, probably still believe the USS Liberty attack was a case of mistaken identity, as though continued strafing of an electronic surveillance warship with a satellite dish was really intended to be a sortie to attack an old horse transport, or as though the attempted torpedoing by the Israeli Navy of a marked US warship at close range could be a case of mistaken identity.  That was a fαℓѕє fℓαg attack.  The communications of the USS Liberty were jammed by the Israelis.  The US almost intervened against Egypt because of it.  And to this day excuses are made for what happened.  People to this day insist Israel is our friend, because they are willfully blind to the reality of what's going on in the world.

2) Those involved in the highest levels of crafting propaganda to manage public opinion would undoubtedly be involved in the film industry.  There's no doubt there's an intersection between the film industry and those in the government and in intelligence.  The Lone Gunmen Episode prior to 9/11, where a plane is taken over electronically and attempted to be rammed into the World Trade Center in order to justify wars overseas, is an example of something that seems to be more than a coincidence.  Was it an attempt at whistle-blowing?  We may never know.  However there is very good reason to believe Hollywood and the government have a lot of connections: the state is involved in propaganda.

3) If some of these shootings are attempts to manipulate mass psychology, those involved in planning them could well be closely aware of Hollywood films, perhaps even involved in crafting them.  They might well choose a location that corresponds to a place name in the movie.  Or if they're involved in producing the movie they might well highlight a certain name that corresponds to a place where an attack is planned.  Someone intimately familiar with Hollywood movies might look for a place with many coincidences - for example the fact that the Hunger Games author is from that city really could be a possible motive for choosing that city as a location for a staged event.  Is it really a coincidence that the Batman movie is about mass murder and suppression of mass ιnѕυrrєcтισn, and manipulation of mass psychology by a murderous evil-doer?  Is it really a coincidence there was bizarre shooting with no apparent motive by a neuroscience student, who apparently was involved in studying the altering of memories? Calling himself the Joker at the premier of Batman?  In the case of the Sandy Hook shooting, the parallels to the Batman map go beyond the mere mention of the place-name.  The shape of the path of the interstate and the relative orientation of the school in Connecticult resembles the shape of the interstate passing the circles "strike zone" on the Batman map, where the location is named "Sandy Hook."

4)  What could possibly be the motive for Revelation of Method?  Is it likely that the elites themselves promote conspiracy theories in order to make their opposition appear ridiculous, and to train people to accept their explanations and disregard evidence of their wrong-doing?  Is it possible that this particular type of revelation- a foreshadowing in a movie, is especially one that most people will reject reflexively?  And so the person who has the truth is represented as someone who is raving?  Is an extra dimension of control achieved when people are trained by social pressure to deny obvious signs in order to be in agreement with the popular narrative.  Is it a way to claim credit for what they're doing?  Are they so vain?

The movies of Stanley Kubrick are famous for their cryptic encoded messages.  Revelation of Method by Hollywood film and tv producers is not something new.  There was definitely the desire to cause people to speculate endlessly, and perhaps to reveal information as well, possibly as "whistle-blowing" (as The Shining is said to be) or for some more bizarre motivation.

Is it possible for the public to detect a staged event?  It has happened, but only when very powerful people expose each other, and usually some years after the fact.  That is to say, it is only when such an event is officially recognized to have been staged that the mass of public opinion accepts that it has been staged.

The reality is that in US popular culture, all alternative theories are now regarded as "conspiracy theories" - and the endless permutations of possible explanations for these events makes attempted discerning of the truth seemingly a fruitless task.

What would it take for the popular opinion to accept that a staged event was truly staged?

It seems to me that practically any sort of attack like this could be staged and that for a majority, they will never accept that such attacks are ever staged, because to do so is to make them a "kook."