Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Sspx Sanford - More Works with the Novus Ordo  (Read 26343 times)

1 Member and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 42179
  • Reputation: +24126/-4346
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sspx Sanford - More Works with the Novus Ordo
« Reply #90 on: March 08, 2024, 03:40:03 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sounds like some disgruntled parishioners trying to control the priests. All of us know how that ultimately turns out.

    Nonsense.  Sounds like completely out-of-line behavior by the priests, who often try to set themselves up as little gods in the parishes, putting them in jeopardy by overspending (money they didn't have), disabling the legally-required fire safety equipment, subjecting them to legal jeopardy, and then ripping off the chapel on their way out.  Typical SSPX behavior, and this wouldn't be the first time I've heard of such things ... typical SSPX bullying.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Sspx Sanford - More Works with the Novus Ordo
    « Reply #91 on: March 13, 2024, 09:14:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Anyone donating to the SSPX Florida deserves what they get. The only thing they care about is money and earthly comforts. What they did to the chapel in Miami is unforgivable.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Sspx Sanford - More Works with the Novus Ordo
    « Reply #92 on: March 13, 2024, 09:40:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Nonsense.  Sounds like completely out-of-line behavior by the priests, who often try to set themselves up as little gods in the parishes, putting them in jeopardy by overspending (money they didn't have), disabling the legally-required fire safety equipment, subjecting them to legal jeopardy, and then ripping off the chapel on their way out.  Typical SSPX behavior, and this wouldn't be the first time I've heard of such things ... typical SSPX bullying.
    There is already a big red flag on what was written, chiefly they claim to have always accorded the priests full authority, yet refused to do so later on. Were they asked to commit sins against Faith and morals? It seems more like there have been some disagreements over prudential judgments which I think is not a good enough reason to reach such an outcome. This case also reminds me of what happened at Our Lady Help of Christians some years back.