Judas was a valid bishop. He has nothing to do with this question. There is no doubt about his validity.
It is not a sin to say a priest is doubtfully ordained and therefore we should not go to his Mass. Telling the truth is not sinful. For example if I say that Fr. Pfeiffer is very doubtfully a bishop and therefore men ordained by him are most likely not priests but laymen dressing as priests that is not a sin. And the young fellows he ordains are guilty of asking orders from him. Anyone receiving the sacraments from them is foolish. It is silly to go to confession to a man who is not certainly a priest. Because if he is not a priest I remain in my sins. And it if it not certain that he is a priest I don't know my state. Am I still in my sins or were they absolved? I don't know. That is why we must tell men who we don't know if they are priests or not to get conditionally ordained by a certainly valid bishop.
Yes, it is a sin. Don't go to his mass if you are doubtful. Just don't spread doubt. Doubt itself
can be a sin. Even worse, you cannot disparage people, let alone priests, even if you think you know something. Simple information only when absolutely necessary. Besides, you might be mistaken, or received mistaken information making you responsible for speaking before you knew more. You do you. Stop dividing. No doubt there are thousands or even millions of people who don't go to mass for fear that all or most priests are pedos, or invalid, or moles when they are not. Even the Church herself doesn't make such a judgement without a tribunal, or at least some kind of hearing. The day the laity are allowed to run the show, saying who's in and who's out, is the day people will praise synodality. The definition of synodality: Operating under the authority of the whims of the laity knowingly or unknowingly manipulated by evil.
Topic: SSPX Fake Priests (Read 116649 times)