Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Evidently you are not acquainted with logic and reasoning ... aka theology. That's why it's not possible to discuss this with you.
It is all or nothing.
I already made clear, that disobedience is relative to it's object. And therefore is not always mortal.
lol. This is like talking to a child.
I have every reason to believe that this guy would lie. He's promoting an agenda and does not have a high moral character ... as evident from his posts.
It is important to avoid all sins, not just mortal ones. Disobeying and disrespecting one's husband is potentially a mortal sin or it might be a venial one. In both cases it is harmful to the woman's soul.All sins, in justice, deserve punishment. That is the nature of sin.
My rationale: Practice and Tradition of the Church and moral theology books.Your rationale: Masonic modern peverted ideas with no precedence in the Church.
No it isn't. That's why God in His Mercy created a place called Purgatory.
Not true, at least not the hate part necessarily and what is necessarily wrong with fear? I've know of lives and limbs not lost because of people hitting each other. Sometimes you don't have time to molly coddle someone who is being thick, and not paying attention, nor do you have the manpower to replace them. Who is afraid of a Catholic man any more? Nobody, esp. our enemies and they should fear us. Our women are more manly than our Nancy boy men by-and-large, the women see it, and that in turn breeds disrespect, and insecurity because it sends the message that we've neither spine to sand to either take care of business, or them when it all goes sideways, which only reinforces women trading clothes with us.Pathetic. I don't want some sissy like you anywhere near me when it starts getting really ugly and bloody.
The common outcome of causing someone to fear or hate you is that they either leave or plot revenge against you. Is that what outcome you're going for here?
I am new here, but you sure sound a lot like Pablo the Mexican in KY.
I have. Several, in fact. All traditional, some independent, some sspx, some resistance, some sedevecanti.The answers are varied.Some say, beat the hell out of her and she's supposed to offer it up.Some say, if he touches her he should be shot.Can't go by what priests say today.
When the Magisterium has been silent on a subject, that's what you're going to find ... a variety of opinion.So let's return to argument.I have made a case for the position that husbands are not permitted to lay violent hands on their wives. No one has attempted to refute it.