Author Topic: Non-Catholics Scandalized by Excessive Drinking at SSPX Sanford Priory (Read 11775 times)

Columcille · « **Reply #40 on:** January 16, 2020, 04:53:55 PM »

Quote from: Columcille on January 16, 2020, 04:52:24 PM

Yep, that's the whole idea. BTW, did they design this damnable forum around the idea of lurking in the shadows and sniping anonymously at others? Why do I need to click a box NOT to hide my identity?

So... for the record... I'm the guy who lives in a glass house and cavorts with the drunk, liberal priests in Sanford. So have at it!

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #41 on:** January 16, 2020, 05:05:17 PM »

Quote from: Anonymous on January 16, 2020, 04:46:58 PM

Bring it. I take it you're labelling me a drunk and a party-goer as you've smeared the Priory priests?

No, my warning you that “People who live in glass houses….” has nothing to do with you drinking and party-going. I do not know anything about your personal life. Anyone that wants to know that can read your website. I have never been one to harm the injured.
The priests on the other hand are all men and they can take the advice I have given.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #42 on:** January 16, 2020, 05:10:13 PM »

Quote

Everyone on this entire site is anonymous, ha ha.

Actually, not necessarily. Across time forum members often develop an acquaintanceship with others who post under a user name and we may know of one’s marital status, the number of children, where they live, what they do for a living, their diversions and hobbies, and so forth. Though not common it is also not unusual for forum members to meet in real life or to have a lively correspondence outside of the forum. In just my last post I disclosed where I did live and where I live now. To flesh that out, I mentioned having knowledge of recycling systems in seven different municipalities … and those would be Pullman, Seattle, Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland in Washington; Moscow in Idaho; San Mateo in California.

Quote

If you want to believe that recycling actually happens, then go ahead.

It has nothing to do with what I want to believe but rather with what I have actually observed and researched. As I’ve included the names of several locations rather than an anonymous “our city” it would be easy enough for one to verify my information on their own.

Quote

All I can say is that in our city, top 25 of population in the US, all of it was dumped in the same spot. Maybe our "contamination" was too high, as you pointed out? I don't know. Just passing along the info.

Assuming the above was written by the same anonymous poster from reply #7 two different things are being said. Reply #7 said:

Quote

… all garbage and "recycled" stuff goes to the same dump.

This would meaning that no recycling occurs and everything, garbage and things which could be recycled, are all shipped to the landfill. This may be altogether different than what is written in reply #26:

Quote

… all of it was dumped in the same spot.

All of what? Garbage AND recyclables or all recyclables all going to the same spot but not garbage? Many communities practice single stream recycling (which tend to not accept glass, or glass has to be handled separately) and the co-mingled recycling then may go to an out of area automated facility for sorting. That certainly does not mean that recycling isn’t happening as you imply.

For just three examples, on any business day one can visit the Whitman County Solid Waste Facility near Pullman, WA, Basin Disposal in Pasco, WA or Moscow Recycling in Moscow, ID and observe recyclable material (glass, cardboard, mixed paper, newsprint, white office paper, clear plastic, colored plastic, plastic milk jugs, rechargeable batteries) being separated and baled for shipment to a buyer while garbage is segregated and reloaded in containers for shipment to a regional landfill.

It has nothing to do with what one want's to believe, but rather with what can be actually observed and verified.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #43 on:** January 16, 2020, 05:12:42 PM »

The above reply #42 was from moneil and I'm nearly positive that I checked the "use my username, not anonymous" box.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #44 on:** January 16, 2020, 05:18:04 PM »

Quote from: Anonymous on January 16, 2020, 05:05:17 PM

No, my warning you that “People who live in glass houses….” has nothing to do with you drinking and party-going. I do not know anything about your personal life. Anyone that wants to know that can read your website. I have never been one to harm the injured.
The priests on the other hand are all men and they can take the advice I have given.

Though evidently you yourself are not man enough to step out of the shadows?
I know not the "injury" of which you speak, though I am happy to admit my personal flaws. Certainly anything I have published on the Internet I am not concerned for the world to know. I do not consider myself to be especially "injured," whatever difficult blows Providence may have caused me to endure. I simply do not understand your rather sinister admonition.
For the record, I would consider myself neither a drinker (in the sense you seem to take it, at least) nor a party-goer. Indeed I am rather reserved. Having said that, and having personal experience of the recreation of the Priory priests and their guests, I remain completely taken aback at your suggestion that their indulgence has been particularly excessive or unbecoming their station.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Non-Catholics Scandalized by Excessive Drinking at SSPX Sanford Priory (Read 11775 times)

Columcille

Re: Non-Catholics Scandalized by Excessive Drinking at SSPX Sanford Priory

Änσnymσus

Re: Non-Catholics Scandalized by Excessive Drinking at SSPX Sanford Priory

Änσnymσus

Re: Non-Catholics Scandalized by Excessive Drinking at SSPX Sanford Priory

Änσnymσus

Re: Non-Catholics Scandalized by Excessive Drinking at SSPX Sanford Priory

Änσnymσus

Re: Non-Catholics Scandalized by Excessive Drinking at SSPX Sanford Priory