Author Topic: New “Windswept House” Novel?  (Read 696 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
New “Windswept House” Novel?
« on: October 01, 2019, 05:13:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I wish someone would write an updated semi-historical version of Malachi Martin’s “Windswept House,” showing the real-life collapse of tradition, Francis, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, Fellay, and all the rest.  

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1777
    • Reputation: +900/-325
    • Gender: Male
    Re: New “Windswept House” Novel?
    « Reply #1 on: October 01, 2019, 05:30:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I wish someone would write an updated semi-historical version of Malachi Martin’s “Windswept House,” showing the real-life collapse of tradition, Francis, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, Fellay, and all the rest.  
    From what I heard, it’s a filthy cesspool of a book. 
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: New “Windswept House” Novel?
    « Reply #2 on: October 01, 2019, 05:44:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Awesome book (and book idea).

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: New “Windswept House” Novel?
    « Reply #3 on: October 01, 2019, 05:44:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • From what I heard, it’s a filthy cesspool of a book.

    And so it goes when life is indeed stranger than fiction.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: New “Windswept House” Novel?
    « Reply #4 on: October 02, 2019, 04:23:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • MARCH 11, 2010
    Windswept House? Fr. Amorth says Devil is ‘at work inside Vatican’
    STEVE SKOJEC
    The 1998 Malachi Martin novel, Windswept House, opens with a Satanic ritual performed at St. Paul’s chapel inside Vatican City by members at every level of the Catholic clergy. The purpose? To open the door of the Church to the Devil’s influence, and lead to the destruction of Catholicism from within. 
    The premise of the book would have been controversial enough, but Martin’s claim that 95% of the story was based on actual events (and 85% of the characters were based on real people) made it moreso.  
    But is it a preposterous assertion that God’s own priests, bishops and cardinals would participate in the work of destruction? The famous vision of Pope Leo XIII  in 1884 would seem to suggest otherwise:
    Quote
    …They recounted that Pope Leo XIII was climbing the steps to the altar when he suddenly stopped, stared fixedly at something in the air and with a terrible look on his face, collapsed to the floor (some accounts say he fell shrieking). The Pope was carried off by those around him to another room where he came around. As one rendition of the story tells it:



     
    “When asked what had happened, he explained that, as he was about to leave the foot of the altar, he suddenly heard voices – two voices, one kind and gentle, the other guttural and harsh. They seemed to come from near the tabernacle. As he listened, he heard the following conversation:
    The guttural voice, the voice of Satan in his pride, boasted to Our Lord: “I can destroy your Church.”
    The gentle voice of Our Lord: “You can? Then go ahead and do so.”
    Satan: “To do so, I need more time and more power.”
    Our Lord: “How much time? How much power?”
    Satan: “75 to 100 years, and a greater power over those who will give themselves over to my service.”
    Our Lord: “You have the time, you will have the power. Do with them what you will.”
    [color][size][font]
    Following this, the Holy Father was so shaken that he sat down and composed the Prayer to St. Michael the Archangel, which was then instituted as a universal prayer to be said after every low Mass throughout the world.  Some would argue that the suppression of this practice by the Sacred Congregation of Rites just 80 years later – nicely within the Devil’s timeline – counts as evidence of the effectiveness of his challenge. 
    Today, we again hear the alarming assertion that the devil is “in the Vatican,” this time from Fr. Gabriel Amorth, considered the world’s most experienced exorcist. In his recently published memoirs, Fr. Amorth makes claims that seem to have come straight from Martin’s novel. According the The Times (UK):
    [/font][/size][/color]
    Quote
    Sex abuse scandals in the Roman Catholic Church are proof that that “the Devil is at work inside the Vatican”, according to the Holy See’s chief exorcist.
    Father Gabriele Amorth, 85, who has been the Vatican’s chief exorcist for 25 years and says he has dealt with 70,000 cases of demonic possession, said that the consequences of satanic infiltration included power struggles at the Vatican as well as “cardinals who do not believe in Jesus, and bishops who are linked to the Demon”.
    He added: “When one speaks of ‘the smoke of Satan’ [a phrase coined by Pope Paul VI in 1972] in the holy rooms, it is all true – including these latest stories of violence and paedophilia.”
    [color][size][font]
    Not everyone thinks Fr. Amorth’s claims are credible. The Times also interviewed Father José Antonio Fortea Cucurull, “a Rome-based exorcist”, who said that
    [/font][/size][/color]
    Quote
    Father Amorth had “gone well beyond the evidence” in claiming that Satan had infiltrated the Vatican corridors.
    “Cardinals might be better or worse, but all have upright intentions and seek the glory of God,” he said. Some Vatican officials were more pious than others, “but from there to affirm that some cardinals are members of satanic sects is an unacceptable distance.”
    [color][size][font]
    I admit, I question the judgment of an exorcist who looks for empirical evidence of the maƈhınątions of the Devil. One of the more profound statements I’ve seen on the Satanic strategy came from Kevin Spacey’s character Verbal in the film, The Usual Suspects. At the end of his description of the workings of the mythical villain Keyser Soze, Verbal concludes: “The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist. And like that – poof! He’s gone.” 
    As someone who has seen the diabolical up close and personal, I know the truth in this statement. I’ve been present at no fewer than half a dozen deliverances of persons under demonic influence (performed by an authorized diocesan priest) and while I never enjoy speaking about these experiences, they have left a lasting impression upon me.  The Devil, cunning as he is, seems to take two approaches in the destruction of souls. The first, and by far most effective and common, is that mentioned above – he conceals his presence, leaving his work undiscovered and unchallenged. The second, more dangerous to his success by far, is the role of terrorist. This latter comes when even his subtlety is noticed and thus rejected by a person of sufficient spiritual intuition, at which point he tries to frighten them into submission through the more dramatic manifestations we’ve all come to associate with the demonic. This approach can be effective – a friend once indicated to me that she never wanted to become “too holy” because she didn’t want to experience the supernatural abuse suffered by so many of the saints. But as men like St. John Vianney proved, even the harshest attacks by Satan could become a source of spiritual consolation, leaving the Devil powerless against someone infused with God’s grace. The problem the Devil faces in showing himself is paradoxical – if he exists, so must the God he works against. This is why he almost always prefers to operate under the cover of darkness. 
    Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich was one of the mystics who saw with prophetic clarity the infiltration of the Church’s hierarchy by those under Satanic influence. Among her visions were the following predictions, which seem eerily similar to those warnings offered by Fr. Amorth:
    [/font][/size][/color]
    Quote
    Then I saw an apparition of the Mother of God, and she said that the tribulation would be very great…They must pray above all for the Church of Darkness to leave Rome.
    [snip]
    I saw deplorable things: they were gambling, drinking, and talking in church; they were courting women. All sorts of abominations were perpetrated there. Priests allowed everything and said Mass with much irreverence. I saw that few of them were still godly, and only a few of them had sound views on things.
    [snip]
    Among the strangest things that I saw, were long processions of bishops. Their thoughts and utterances were made known to me through images issuing from their mouths. Their faults towards religion were shown by external deformities. A few had only a body, with a dark cloud of fog instead of a head. Others had only a head, their bodies and hearts were like thick vapors. Some were lame; others were paralytics; others were asleep or staggering.
    I saw what I believe to be nearly all the bishops of the world, but only a small number were perfectly sound. I also saw the Holy Father– God-fearing and prayerful. Nothing left to be desired in his appearance, but he was weakened by old age and by much suffering…
    Then I saw that everything that pertained to Protestantism was gradually gaining the upper hand, and the Catholic religion fell into complete decadence. Most priests were lured by the glittering but false knowledge of young school-teachers, and they all contributed to the work of destruction.
    In those days, Faith will fall very low, and it will be preserved in some places only…
    [color][size][font]
    It’s difficult for some of us to believe that the Devil – whom we know exists as an article of faith – could be so at work even within the Church itself. And yet we’ve received countless warnings that it would be so, even from Christ himself. His promise is both comforting and frightening:
    And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” (Mt. 16:18)
    For Christ to offer such a guarantee means that the “gates of hell” would not only try to prevail against the Church, but would come so close to success as to appear to have done so. That this apparent success would be defeated by His power and the efficacy of the Church is a great consolation to us, but we should not presume it will be easy. We must all remain vigilant, and pray that we will be preserved from the enemy, and that his influence will be defeated – not only in our own lives, but in the Church itself. 
     
    Tagged as ChurchRomeVaticanWindswept House

    [/font][/size][/color][color][size][font]


    By Steve Skojec
    Steve Skojec serves as the Director of Community Relations for a professional association. He is a graduate of Franciscan University of Steubenville, where he earned a BA in Communications and Theology. His passions include writing, photography, social media, and an avid appreciation of science fiction. Steve lives in Northern Virginia with his wife Jamie and their five children.


    Subscribe to Crisis
    (It’s Free)





    More on Crisis
    [/font][/size][/color][color][size][font]
    Go to Crisis homepage
    Crisis Magazine Comments Policy
    This is a Catholic forum. As such:
    [/font][/size][/color]
    • All comments must directly address the article. “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter.” (Matthew 12:36)
    • No profanity, ad hominems, hot tempers, or racial or religious invectives. “And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” (Ephesians 4:32)
    • We will not tolerate heresy, calumny, or attacks upon our Holy Mother Church or Holy Father. “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)
    • Keep it brief. No lengthy rants or block quotes. “For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes.” (James 4:14)
    • If you see a comment that doesn’t meet our standards, please flag it so a moderator may remove it. “Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.” (Galatians 6:1)
    • All comments may be removed at the moderators’ discretion. “But of that day and hour no one knows…” (Matthew 24:36)
    • Crisis isn’t responsible for the content of the comments box. Comments do not represent the views of Crisis magazine, its editors, authors, or publishers. “Why do you pass judgment on your brother? Or you, why do you despise your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God… So each of us shall give account of himself to God.” (Romans 14:10, 12)




    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: New “Windswept House” Novel?
    « Reply #5 on: October 02, 2019, 04:37:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is what Elija, Patriarch of the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate has to say:



     Francis Bergoglio and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖism

    In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus highlighted moral purity: “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.” He also said: “Anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” And He added: “If your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off…” The Lord Jesus calls for a resolute stand in this sphere. Scripture warns against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity: “sơdơm and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sɛҳuąƖ immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.” (Jude 1:7) Francis Bergoglio, by contrast, systematically promotes ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖism, thus abusing the papal office and bringing a curse on the whole Church.
    2013
    – gαy-scandal Msgr. Ricca was appointed by Bergoglio as Vatican bank prelate and as the director of the Domus Santa Marta where Bergoglio lives...
    Response: Bergoglio neither admonishes nor punishes the sơdơmite Ricca; on the contrary, he promotes him as a precedent. This is a crime! Francis and a number of prelates live in the Domus Santa Marta together with the notorious ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Ricca. There is no need for further comment.
    – In a press conference on his return flight from the World Youth Day in Brazil in July 2013, Bergoglio said: “Who am I to judge gαy people?”
    Response: The duty of the rightful Pope is to clearly condemn sơdơmy as a sin and abomination in accordance with Scripture and Tradition. Bergoglio, however, approves and promotes ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, for which reason he has brought on himself God’s anathema, i.e. expulsion from the Church.
    – American LGBT magazine The Advocate named Bergoglio as ‘Person of the Year’ for his statement “Who am I to judge them?”
    Response: This also confirms that Bergoglio’s approval of sơdơmy was not ambiguous at all. The sơdơmites understood Bergoglio quite clearly and immediately honoured him.
    2014
    – On 21 March, Francis walked hand in hand with the well-known Italian ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ priest Luigi Ciotti. On 6 May, Francis concelebrated Holy Mass with another ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ priest, Michele de Paolis, in the Vatican and at the end kissed his hand.
    Response: Bergoglio seeks every opportunity to promote sơdơmy not only by word but by gesture too.
    – At the October Synod on the Family, Bergoglio issued a document approving amorality: “ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs have gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community.”
    Response: To be really Christian, the Christian community must in the first place call a sin a sin and an abomination an abomination. As regards the statement that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs supposedly offer their gifts to the Christian community, the main pseudo gift is contamination of the Christian community with sơdơmy. Another gift is AIDS and various forms of hepatitis. The gift for the souls within the community is an unclean spirit, antirepentance and the road to perdition. What Bergoglio promotes is a “Greek gift” from the devil rather than from God.
    – The document further states: “Are we capable of welcoming these people, guaranteeing to them a fraternal space in our communities?”
    Response: How can Christians welcome people who a priori reject truth and repentance? Christians would have to betray Christ and submit to the spirit of perversion. They would have to accept sin as a standard and reject God’s commandments. But they would no longer be Christian communities. They would become Bergoglio’s LGBT clubs.
    – The document continues: “Are our communities capable of this, accepting and valuing their (i.e. of the sơdơmites) sɛҳuąƖ orientation?”
    Response: Bergoglio’s document calls for the adoption of the term “sɛҳuąƖ orientation” with the aim of making sơdơmy accepted in Christian communities. By accepting the term sɛҳuąƖ orientation associated with sơdơmy, the episcopal, clerical, religious or lay community is automatically excluded from the Church of Christ. As for valuing, the Word of God unalterably values sơdơmy as a sin and abomination (Rom 1:18f) and warns against the punishment of eternal fire (Jude 1:7).
    Bergoglio’s document did not gain approval at the time; however, he managed to legalize sơdơmy some time later.
    2015
    – In January 2015, Francis phoned a Spanish transsɛҳuąƖ by the name of Diego Neria, who was born a woman. He invited her and her “lesbian fiancée” to a private audience in Rome. The costs were paid by the Vatican. Bergoglio said to the transsɛҳuąƖ: “God loves all His children as they are. You are a son of God and the Church loves you and accepts you as you are.”
    Response: By his manipulative statement “God loves all His children as they are”, Bergoglio legalizes sin and crime against nature. He thus breaks God’s laws and sets a precedent. It is programmed support of perverted gender ideology leading to the self-destruction of nations.
    If Bergoglio promotes this by authority of the Pope, he thus actually says that this is what God wants! It is a devilish abuse of papal authority! He thus forces Catholics into normalizing sin and boycotting God’s commandments. If any Catholic today stands in defence of God’s laws, all will condemn him as a sectarian who defies the Holy Father. On the other hand, if anyone submits to the pseudo Pope, he is forced to defy God and His commandments. Contemporary Catholics with their bishops and priests, therefore, have two options: they will either support the demand of Archbp. Carlo Maria Viganò for the abdication of the pseudo Pope, or they are forced to be in line with Bergoglio on the path to eternal destruction.
    – Bergoglio then said to the transsɛҳuąƖ: “You are a son of God and the Church loves you and accepts you as you are.”
    Response: Who is a son of God? Scripture says, “As many as received Him, to them He gave power to become the sons of God.” (Jn 1:12) Those, however, who reject Christ and wilfully persist in sin will hear the words, “Depart from Me, you who practise lawlessness, into the everlasting fire!” (Mt 7:23; 25:41) “You are of your father the devil.” (Jn 8:44)
    The role of the Church is to call for repentance so that people may be saved from eternal damnation and attain eternal salvation. Unrepentant sinners are denied absolution by the Church.
    Bergoglio applies the method of so-called case law. Under the guise of an individual approach of so-called love to a transsɛҳuąƖ who refuses to repent, he establishes perversion as a precedent. In fact, he was obliged, as a precedent, to call on the transsɛҳuąƖ to repent. However, Bergoglio has so far never established such a precedent.
    The pseudo Pope changes public opinion in the whole Church through one case. The consequences are terrible. Catholics are set on the downward path to eternal damnation.
    – On 18 February 2015, the LGBT organization New Ways Ministry, for the first time in history, got a VIP access to regular Papal General Audience in the Vatican City.
    Response: If Bergoglio welcomes LGBT persons at the regular papal audiences, he makes it manifest that the unrepentant sơdơmites are nowadays a Vatican elite. It follows from this that so-called homophobic Catholics have to change their attitude in obedience to the so-called Holy Father. They have to set aside God’s commandments and adopt anticommandments which guarantee a reward in hell.
    – On Maundy Thursday (April 2015), Bergoglio washes and kisses the feet of a transsɛҳuąƖ, among others.
    Response: This was Bergoglio’s groundbreaking provocative gesture! How did the Catholic world respond? The Catholic world accepted the implemented heresy because of papal authority.
    – During his visit to the United States in September 2015, the only personal meeting that Francis had was with a same-sex couple. The Vatican referred to them as “family”. One of them, Yayo Grassi, is an old friend of Francis. Francis warmly embraced and kissed these two sơdơmites. Francis reportedly said to Grassi that he had prayed for him and his partner and asked them to pray for him too.
    Response: It was either a pious phrase or Bergoglio and the two accomplices prayed to their god, i.e. the devil.
    – In September 2015, 800,000 Catholics, including 200 cardinals, bishops or archbishops, demand clarification from Francis of the Church’s position on same-sex marriage.
    Response: While Bergoglio devotes attention to one ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ all through the weekend, he boycotts in cold blood 800,000 Catholics and their church leaders.
    2016
    – In January 2016, a two-million-strong demonstration against gαy child adoption took place in Rome.
    Response: What about Francis? In his address after the Sunday Angelus, he not only did not support the rally but even ridiculed and condemned it.
    – On his return from Armenia (26 June 2016), he said: “The Roman Catholic Church should apologize to gαy people for the way they have been treated.”
    Response: Francis should say clearly what the Church should apologize for. For respecting God’s commandments and for calling sin sin? For demanding that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs should not continue in sin but break with it and thus be saved from hell? What actually should the Church apologize for?
    2018
    – During his visit to Ireland in August, Francis openly promoted ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity at a young age. In his view, parents should not prevent it.
    Response: Children are systematically infected with ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ immorality directly at school through so-called sɛҳuąƖ education, through the internet and through the mass media. At least parents must counterbalance it and protect them from their moral self-destruction. They must prepare them for responsible marriage and parenthood. Bergoglio emotionally manipulates parents into making the amoral infection progress in their children rather than protecting them against it. This is a crime!
    – In September 2018, Bergoglio visited the Baltic States where he covertly promoted ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖism and migration.
    Response: These visits are no apostolic journeys because Bergoglio neither preaches Christ nor emphasizes God’s laws. He does the exact opposite, and not only in the Baltic States but everywhere. Bergoglio is a pseudo missionary promoting ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖism, paganism and Islamization or, in other words, destruction of the Catholic Church and Christianity as a whole.
    – On 4-28 October 2018, the Bishops’ Synod on Youth took place in Rome under the baton of Francis. By a final document dated 27 October 2018, the Synod legalized LGBTQ in the Church. Francis as well as the bishops and cardinals present received rainbow crosses.
    Response: Bergoglio repeatedly abuses papal power to promote ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ ideology resulting in the genocide of humanity. He commits the gravest crime not only against the Church but also against humanity.
    2019
    – On 28 January 2019, during his in-flight press conference when returning from the World Youth Day in Panama, he said: “I think it is important to teach sex education in schools.”
    Response: The sɛҳuąƖ education curriculum internationally defined by the UN is intended to infect young children and youth with sơdơmy and transsɛҳuąƖity. Children become sɛҳuąƖ slaves unable to establish a family in the future.
    – Bergoglio continued about sɛҳuąƖ education: “Sex is a gift from God. It is not a bogeyman (evil spirit); it is a gift from God in order to love.”
    Response: It is a gift for sacramental marriage, which is connected with the responsibility for the transmission of life and for the upbringing of children. sɛҳuąƖ activity outside marriage is a sin. sɛҳuąƖ perversion results directly in the self-destruction of the individual, family and society.
    – Bergoglio even confirmed his shocking statement: “Sex as a gift from God must be taught, not with strictness…”
    Response: What does Bergoglio actually want? To teach children sex without strictness, i.e. without restraint! Bergoglio thus advocates mental disturbance in children and the opening up of their innocent souls to lifelong occupation by unclean demons. To the question whether Bergoglio serves God or Satan there is a clear answer: He definitely does not serve God.
    – On 21-24 February 2019, a Synod was held in Rome concerning sɛҳuąƖ abuse in the Church. Again, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖism was cunningly promoted at the Synod.
    Response: Bergoglio used the Synod to establish binding guidelines for bishops to convert the Catholic Church to Bergoglio’s LGBTQ anti-Church.

    What to say in conclusion?
    Bergoglio has convened an Amazon Synod for October 2019 which will de facto be a solemn funeral of the Catholic Church.
    Dear Cardinals and Bishops, will You be gravediggers of the Church like Bergoglio? In this situation, You are obliged before God, before the Church of Christ, even at the cost of Your life, to stand against the spiritual criminal who illegitimately occupies the papal office! You are obliged to elect an orthodox Pope as soon as possible, even in an extraordinary way!

    + Elijah
    Patriarch of the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate

    + Methodius OSBMr + Timothy OSBMr
    Secretary Bishops

    2 September 2019

    ------------------------------------------------------

    Francis Bergoglio and interreligious dialogue

    There is not a single day that passes without Bergoglio promoting interreligious dialogue. He thus purposefully destroys the Church.
    In the present time the only and right solution is the following: to abolish interreligious dialogue and to open the door for true reevangelization and mission.
    Question: What is the primary mission of the Church?
    Answer: To preach the Gospel (Mt 28) so that the souls may be saved. The Lord Jesus Christ did not call for interreligious dialogue with pagans or with the world but He commanded us to open people’s eyes, in order to turn them from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God (cf. Acts 26:18). Interreligious dialogue is a betrayal of the Church’s mission.
    Question: What can mission be likened to?
    Answer: Mission can be likened to the action of rescue workers at sea. There can be no dialogue with the passengers of a sinking ship. They must be saved.
    Question: What is interreligious dialogue based on?
    Answer: The whole system of interreligious dialogue is based on lies:
    1) One has to presume that pagans have an equally valid way to salvation – and this is a lie.
    2) One must not preach to them the full Gospel in power that they may turn to God and be saved – this is a crime.
    3) One must not proclaim that Jesus Christ is the only Saviour – this is a betrayal of Christ and the Church.
    4) One must maintain that pagan practices and Buddhist meditations enrich us – this is a big deceit.
    Question: Who is presently the principal agent of antimission in the very heart of the Church?
    Answer: Pseudo Pope Bergoglio. He is like a shepherd who instead of searching for the lost sheep lets wolves in the sheepfold and allows them to tear the poor sheep inside the very sheepfold of the Church.
    Question: Who are we Christians?
    Answer: We, Christians, are the witnesses of Jesus and we have the Spirit of Christ.
    Question: What spirit do pagans have?
    Answer: Pagans, be it Buddhists, Hindus or others, have the spirit of lies and death. They are spiritually dead.
    Question: What can interreligious dialogue be compared to?
    Answer: Interreligious dialogue with pagans can be compared to contact with a person ill with a dєαdlу infection.
    - A liberal Catholic cannot help a pagan through interreligious dialogue, but he himself becomes ill with a dєαdlу infection and then passes on the infection to the Church. This is antimission.
    - A true missionary who makes the proclamation of salvation in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the foundation, the centre and the peak does not enter into interreligious dialogue! On the contrary, he preaches Christ in the power of the Spirit, and the souls are delivered from the power of Satan (cf. Acts 26:18). But the price to be paid for this mission is persecution and often even martyrdom.
    Question: What is the difference between an antimissionary promoting interreligious dialogue and a missionary of Christ?
    Answer: There is a diametrical difference between them. An antimissionary spreads an infection to the heart of the Church. A missionary of Christ saves the souls from the dєαdlу infection.
    Question: What is the fruit of interreligious dialogue?
    Answer: The spiritual vacuum created by heresies is filled with a so-called new spirit of pagan religions or cults. But no one is allowed to debate this. They must be accepted uncritically and with respect. No dialogue is allowed. There is a dictate of the spirit of lies and death. Interreligious dialogue is a system leading to insidious and hidden ѕυιcιdє of the Church.
    Question: What is the attitude of St Basil to such dialogue?
    Answer: St Basil says: “Dialogues with those who are soaked with false teachings about faith and God cause disintegration of personality as a whole. Talking to them is of greater harm than contact with moral perverts.” This attitude of St Basil is the same as that of Scripture. The Word of God permits no interreligious dialogue. The fruit of such dialogue which Eve had with the serpent in Eden was the loss of life – death (cf. Gen 3:19).
    Question: What are the three basic principles for mission?
    Answer: A Christian must know:
    1) Who am I speaking to and what spirit is behind him?
    If I am speaking to a Buddhist or a Hindu, I have to know that he has the spirit of paganism, the spirit of religious deceit. This person is its medium, and so I am not able to convince him of God’s truth by human means. He will constantly question the truth with ostensible human wisdom. But this wisdom, according to Scripture, is foolishness! (1Cor 1)
    2) What is the purpose of the mission conversation?
    To witness to Jesus so that the one who hears may believe, receive Jesus and be delivered from the power of darkness.
    3) What is the manner of the mission conversation?
    This is a spiritual battle with the spirit of darkness, and therefore a Christian must not open himself to it. In the Epistle to the Ephesians, Scripture commands us to be equipped for this battle with five weapons for defence and, in addition, with the sword of the Spirit which is for both defence and offence.
    Question: What are the norms of interreligious dialogue?
    Answer: The norms are completely perverted! According to these norms, a Christian should renounce the truth and accept that the pagan he is speaking to is right and that he should listen to him. It is the same as if we knew that there is poison in one glass and clean water in the other, and we would start drinking poison for the sake of dialogue. The fruit is spiritual death.
    Question: How long has interreligious dialogue worked and what are its fruits?
    Answer: Interreligious dialogue has its roots in Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate. It has turned out over the past five decades that it is responsible for mass apostasy from the Church and its internal decay. Firstly, it prevents and eliminates the proclamation of the Gospel of Christ to pagans and secondly, it turns Christians into pagans inside the Church. This is the harsh reality which the adherents of so-called interreligious dialogue do not want to hear. Such dialogue, in essence, is a betrayal of Christ and a betrayal of the Church!
    Question: What is the essence of Christianity?
    Answer: Salvation in the Lord Jesus Christ through faith. Christianity truthfully shows the basic realities concerning man. It shows the meaning and purpose of our life, namely to receive the divine life here in time which will be brought to perfection in eternity. It truthfully shows the meaning of suffering which we endure daily.
    Question: What happens in interreligious dialogue?
    Answer: Christians exchange the truth and life for false philosophical and pagan systems. They thus step onto the road to destruction. It is the madness of contemporary apostate Christianity!
    Question: What else can interreligious dialogue be compared to?
    Answer: It can be compared to the situation where the father of the family starts to bring home people suffering from various infectious diseases. For example, he invites a person suffering from typhus, and the children become infected. However, the father invites another one who has another kind of infection. The children are almost unable to breathe, and soon they die of these infectious diseases. This is a picture of interreligious dialogue. The carriers of infection suffer no harm in contact with those who are healthy, but those who are healthy die.
    Question: What to say in conclusion?
    Answer: The Amazon Synod goes even deeper than interreligious dialogue. Satanism, which is the essence of paganism, is going to be officially accepted and legalized by the pseudo Pope at the Synod.
    Dear bishops and priests, take a decisive step for the restoration of the Church: Stop mentioning the name of the murderer of the Church of Christ during the Mass!

    Online Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 24647
    • Reputation: +13805/-3678
    • Gender: Male
    Re: New “Windswept House” Novel?
    « Reply #6 on: October 02, 2019, 08:47:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is what Elija, Patriarch of the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate has to say:

    Isn't this the leader of the Byzantine group that went sedevacantist?  There's also a group of sedevacantist Ukrainian Catholics.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: New “Windswept House” Novel?
    « Reply #7 on: October 02, 2019, 10:35:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Unfortunately Malachi Martin was a promoter(and extortionist) for the ʝʊdɛօ-masonic agenda under Cardinal Bea (a jew) at Vll. Maybe he changed later in life, i don't know. But even after death, he is still an enigmatic, curious character.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: New “Windswept House” Novel?
    « Reply #8 on: October 02, 2019, 10:43:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • From what I heard, it’s a filthy cesspool of a book.
    I think you have it mixed up with another Malachi Martin book "Hostage to the Devil". There is nothing filthy in Windswept House, at least as I remember, having read it like 1998?

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: New “Windswept House” Novel?
    « Reply #9 on: October 02, 2019, 10:45:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Isn't this the leader of the Byzantine group that went sedevacantist?  There's also a group of sedevacantist Ukrainian Catholics.
    Very interesting never heard of him before. 

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4930
    • Reputation: +2546/-959
    • Gender: Male
    Re: New “Windswept House” Novel?
    « Reply #10 on: October 02, 2019, 10:46:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Lat two quotes are from me 
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24


    Online Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 24647
    • Reputation: +13805/-3678
    • Gender: Male
    Re: New “Windswept House” Novel?
    « Reply #11 on: October 02, 2019, 11:58:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think you have it mixed up with another Malachi Martin book "Hostage to the Devil". There is nothing filthy in Windswept House, at least as I remember, having read it like 1998?

    If I recall, there were some fairly graphic descriptions of sɛҳuąƖ assault in the book.


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16