Here is the whole paragraph:
This is lifted straight from the OP.
.
I persist in imagining? There is plenty of imagination in some of the anonymous posters here, accusing me of thinking/saying/inferring things I have not said, but none in what I have written.
.
The last two sentences can and do give the impression that "she did not know everything" refers to its immediate precedent, no?
.
Thank you for your gentle correction.
.
I am just amazed that so many people among the anonymous can take offence (and be offensive), at such a simple and insignificant comment.
With all respect, you are making a fool of yourself.
Your pride is causing you to be unedifyingly recalcitrant, when you should be acknowledging your mistake.
Since you won't, there is really no point in continuing.
And since I wish your correction, rather than your humiliation, I will let it go too.
Let's just say that nobody but you still pretends (at the expense of a priest!) that Fr. Lafitte was referencing the "I know not man" phrase, when he was clearly referencing the "how shall this be" with reference to the Incarnation (proving thereby that contrary to Valtorta, Our Lady did not have infused knowledge.
Topic: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes (Read 17034 times)