Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Have Women Become Too Independent For Marriage?  (Read 8694 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Have Women Become Too Independent For Marriage?
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2018, 11:39:40 PM »
Begin by the fact that practically no one is a real Catholic in this world and everything else falls into place. There are no men or women who live a Catholic life. So, the question should be what is a Catholic life and what parents are teaching their children what a real how Catholic  husband and wife should behave with each other? In my SSPX chapel of like 75 families, there are only like 4 families that are raising their children  with the proper tools to be real Catholic husbands and wives. This is a Catholic forum, focus on those people and not the world. As a man, what do you bring to the marriage? As a woman, what do you bring to the marriage? 

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Have Women Become Too Independent For Marriage?
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2018, 01:09:56 AM »
A woman will submit if her husband is kind and loving. He doesn’t have double standards in behavior, or use his wife as only a copulation outlet, maid, and nanny. If a woman grows up watching men take advantage of her true nature, or her mothers, she will naturally think feminist thinking is the way to go. We are of course speaking of situations were she is taught verbally feminism is wrong. If actions don’t match the words it won’t stick. Husbands must be kind, gentle, helpful, emotional support, and lovers to their wives as well. It’s not just a one way street. Fathers should lead the example so their children don’t have to worry about feminist thinking...daughters, or sons.


Re: Have Women Become Too Independent For Marriage?
« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2018, 03:25:03 AM »
Females inherited the fallen nature of Eve's disobedience and delusion (to become something that's not in her true capability). She disobeyed God's instructions not to eat of the Garden, and she thought she could have God's knowledge by eating of it. Eve was the first feminist. Females would rather marry the State and / or their careers because the State defends their disobedience to God and men by reprimanding any man who would try to oppose her, even when the opposition is righteous. The State assists women's rebellion against God and man. Women's careers are an affront to God's natural law, thus, their egotism and narcissism make them think of themselves higher and stronger than their true selves. They only thrive, materially, in an artificial world that's deliberately propped up to eclipse reality where families, societies and nations are led by strong men. Only strong men can defend Christ's Social Reign. This is why Catholic monarchies were targeted for eradication by Jew revolutionaries. This is why seminaries were targeted by perverts against nature. This is why Jews pioneered feminism and gave women the "right" to vote, because a cascade of liberalism and humanism was sure to follow. Women voted subversives into office. Women in power and a morally bereft nation are easier to manipulate. The goal of the Jew is to completely remove Jesus Christ from civilization. Women lack the intelligence to understand that they're pawns in this agenda.

A woman's love of a man is best demonstrated by her obedience to him. If a woman lacks obedience to a man, she doesn't truly love him. She only loves what he can provide for her.

Males inherited the fallen nature of Adam in naively putting too much trust into females and leaving them to their own faculties, instead of leading them, which inevitably results in the woman being corrupted and easily manipulated by evil. This happened when Adam left Eve alone, subsequently, Satan succeeded in sowing disobedience in her. Adam got suckered into trusting Eve's claim that it was fine to eat of the Garden. The number of times that men got suckered by women to do the wrong things must equal the number of stars in the cosmos.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Have Women Become Too Independent For Marriage?
« Reply #13 on: November 12, 2018, 06:12:24 AM »
Begin by the fact that practically no one is a real Catholic in this world and everything else falls into place. There are no men or women who live a Catholic life. So, the question should be what is a Catholic life and what parents are teaching their children what a real how Catholic  husband and wife should behave with each other? In my SSPX chapel of like 75 families, there are only like 4 families that are raising their children  with the proper tools to be real Catholic husbands and wives. This is a Catholic forum, focus on those people and not the world. As a man, what do you bring to the marriage? As a woman, what do you bring to the marriage?
So you've been spying on the people at your chapel and you know what goes on in their homes? And you believe that there are no Catholics left... except for you, right?

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Have Women Become Too Independent For Marriage?
« Reply #14 on: November 12, 2018, 07:12:44 AM »
Females inherited the fallen nature of Eve's disobedience and delusion (to become something that's not in her true capability). She disobeyed God's instructions not to eat of the Garden, and she thought she could have God's knowledge by eating of it. Eve was the first feminist. Females would rather marry the State and / or their careers because the State defends their disobedience to God and men by reprimanding any man who would try to oppose her, even when the opposition is righteous. The State assists women's rebellion against God and man. Women's careers are an affront to God's natural law, thus, their egotism and narcissism make them think of themselves higher and stronger than their true selves. They only thrive, materially, in an artificial world that's deliberately propped up to eclipse reality where families, societies and nations are led by strong men. Only strong men can defend Christ's Social Reign. This is why Catholic monarchies were targeted for eradication by Jew revolutionaries. This is why seminaries were targeted by perverts against nature. This is why Jews pioneered feminism and gave women the "right" to vote, because a cascade of liberalism and humanism was sure to follow. Women voted subversives into office. Women in power and a morally bereft nation are easier to manipulate. The goal of the Jew is to completely remove Jesus Christ from civilization. Women lack the intelligence to understand that they're pawns in this agenda.

A woman's love of a man is best demonstrated by her obedience to him. If a woman lacks obedience to a man, she doesn't truly love him. She only loves what he can provide for her.

Males inherited the fallen nature of Adam in naively putting too much trust into females and leaving them to their own faculties, instead of leading them, which inevitably results in the woman being corrupted and easily manipulated by evil. This happened when Adam left Eve alone, subsequently, Satan succeeded in sowing disobedience in her. Adam got suckered into trusting Eve's claim that it was fine to eat of the Garden. The number of times that men got suckered by women to do the wrong things must equal the number of stars in the cosmos.
Not all Women are not evil, liars or manipulative. Just like not all men are cheaters, liars, abusive, manipulative. Adam ate the apple same as eve... he could have said no, and God could have scrapped her to make a better model. But Adam desired the same thing she did, and that was unlimited power/knowledge. It didn’t take much for Delilah to get Samson. All she had to do was give a come hither look, and he was gone. Both these men ended in trouble because of their own choices, not just the woman. God told Lots family not to look back, and Lot’s wife did, she turned to salt. Lot listened to God, and did not turn back. Women don’t lead men anywhere they don’t want to go, and that goes for men leading women too.