Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]

Author Topic: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider  (Read 20620 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
« Reply #90 on: January 13, 2024, 01:33:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mark 79 on January 13, 2024, 12:59:04 PM
      In the face of the perennial nursing shortage, layoff of massive numbers of nurses strikes me as a depopulationist move to enhance the lethality of the next wave bioweapon "pandemic."

    Especially as some nurses are now waking up to the harm done to their selves and families, bodies and souls, from what the last plandemic wanted from them so as to be able to keep their jobs. Then there are all these on-contract "travel nurses" who for long stretches of time have to be apart from their own young children, even newborns. Imagine having to live like that.

    The so-called health care industry has bloated into a huge cash cow to the point where they're killing the goose that used to lay the golden eggs, pardon the mixed metaphor. They create endemic illness in order to create a corporate need to exist, especially the revenue stream to support an army of managerials utterly superfluous to a rightly-ordered society.

    The players again see that there are multiple tribes of vultures, including government regulators, insurance companies, and so on, who now find themselves all working at cross purposes. Party over, till they invent new mega scams to replace the old ones.
    Logged

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12652
    • Reputation: +8384/-1596
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #91 on: January 13, 2024, 01:41:49 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Änσnymσus on January 13, 2024, 01:33:01 PM
    …The players again see that there are multiple tribes of vultures, including government regulators, insurance companies, and so on, who now find themselves all working at cross purposes. Party over, till they invent new mega scams to replace the old ones.

    Whether knowingly or not, the "government regulators, insurance companies, and so on" are not working at cross purposes, but are united in their (((satanic depopulationist agenda))).

    Satan and his ѕуηαgσgυє are using every means—perpetual war, famine, weaponized "health care," "reproductive rights," "LGBTQXYZ rights," weaponized money, etc.—to depopulate the planet, enslave the survivors under the reign of Satan, destroy God's one Church, and encourage sin so that the dead will burn in hell for all eternity.
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46864
    • Reputation: +27734/-5149
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #92 on: January 13, 2024, 01:48:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mark 79 on January 13, 2024, 01:41:49 PM
    Whether knowingly or not, the "government regulators, insurance companies, and so on" are not working at cross purposes, but are united in their (((satanic depopulationist agenda))).

    Yes, they are.  I'll provide a simple example.  It's medically proven that chemotherapy has no benefit for any tissue cancers, but some marginal results with leukemia and lymphoma only.  Yet the health insurance companies go along with paying out hundreds of thousands for that nonsense anyway.  You would think the insurance companies would fight it and assert that they shouldn't have to pay for a treatment that is proven not to work.  More people are killed by chemotherapy than by cancer itself.
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #93 on: January 13, 2024, 01:56:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Änσnymσus on January 13, 2024, 01:09:21 PM
    So, it's an uncatholic demand to ask you to provide support for your opinion on what YOU think the motives of other posters are (ie. "attention-grabbing" posts)? Actually, what was "unCatholic" was your judging their internal forum.
    but you questioning my internal forum is allowed, two standards, got it. this isn't about your motives or your internal forum. the external forum proof of attention-grabbing behavior is  the fact that people have to stop talking about what they're talking about because they have to answer YOUR demands and allegations over and over again instead of being left in peace to discuss the topic. bye.
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #94 on: January 13, 2024, 02:18:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mark 79 on January 13, 2024, 12:59:04 PM
    In the face of the perennial nursing shortage, layoff of massive numbers of nurses strikes me as a depopulationist move to enhance the lethality of the next wave bioweapon "pandemic."
    Don't mean to derail but in Canada, amid this terrible health care shortage, a major hospital hired a liason nurse for the queers so they won't feel uncomfortable in the hospital setting.
     Will she fast track them for treatment?
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #95 on: January 13, 2024, 02:40:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Änσnymσus on January 13, 2024, 01:56:18 PM
    but you questioning my internal forum is allowed, two standards, got it. this isn't about your motives or your internal forum. the external forum proof of attention-grabbing behavior is  the fact that people have to stop talking about what they're talking about because they have to answer YOUR demands and allegations over and over again instead of being left in peace to discuss the topic. bye.
    I never questioned your internal forum (but I think you know that).  I asked you to cough up evidence that people posted to grab attention. Because you can't/refuse to do so is not my fault. As far as anyone can tell in the external forum, those posters did not post to grab attention.
     
    But nice attempt at making this about me. What you should have done was apologize for going as far as saying posters were just making "irrelevant, attention-grabbing opinions".
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #96 on: January 13, 2024, 05:07:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus on January 13, 2024, 01:48:41 PM
    Yes, they are.  I'll provide a simple example.  It's medically proven that chemotherapy has no benefit for any tissue cancers, but some marginal results with leukemia and lymphoma only.  Yet the health insurance companies go along with paying out hundreds of thousands for that nonsense anyway.  You would think the insurance companies would fight it and assert that they shouldn't have to pay for a treatment that is proven not to work.  More people are killed by chemotherapy than by cancer itself.

    It is indeed telling that (((corporations))) put (((agenda))) at a higher priority than even (((their))) worship of money.
    Logged

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12652
    • Reputation: +8384/-1596
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #97 on: January 13, 2024, 05:12:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus on January 13, 2024, 01:48:41 PM
    Yes, they are.  I'll provide a simple example.  It's medically proven that chemotherapy has no benefit for any tissue cancers, but some marginal results with leukemia and lymphoma only.  Yet the health insurance companies go along with paying out hundreds of thousands for that nonsense anyway.  You would think the insurance companies would fight it and assert that they shouldn't have to pay for a treatment that is proven not to work.  More people are killed by chemotherapy than by cancer itself.
    It is indeed telling that (((corporations))) put (((agenda))) at a higher priority than even (((their))) worship of money.
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #98 on: January 13, 2024, 05:15:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Änσnymσus on January 12, 2024, 05:54:38 PM
    Actually, OP could have retired early with that income and number of years working. It's called reducing your living expenses.
    You're an idiot.
    Logged

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12652
    • Reputation: +8384/-1596
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #99 on: January 13, 2024, 09:58:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mark 79 on January 13, 2024, 12:59:04 PM
    To put this in perspective, is your "major healthcare provider" of such size as, for example, United Health Care or Optum? Kaiser? Banner?

    Can you name the company?  I ask because I'd appreciate some sense of size of the company. If your employer has name recognition, this is a chilling harbinger of an enormous "ripple effect."

    In the face of the perennial nursing shortage, layoff of massive numbers of nurses strikes me as a depopulationist move to enhance the lethality of the next wave bioweapon "pandemic."
    I am re-porting this in hopes that the OP can openly name the major healthcare provider.
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #100 on: January 15, 2024, 11:47:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • https://www.tennessean.com/story/opinion/contributors/2024/01/15/tennessee-health-care-doctors-nurses-brain-drain-abortion-trans-laws/72107846007/

    Brain drained Doctors and nurses whining that they will leave to make more money to murder babies and mutilate children.  

    By not performing anti life abortions and trans, this should free up doctors and nurses to help people with medical problems.  Hospitals are all about profits over people which is Anti Christ.  
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #101 on: January 15, 2024, 11:54:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • “Brain drain” United nation of nitwits terminology.  

    Logged

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32917
    • Reputation: +29195/-596
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #102 on: January 16, 2024, 01:50:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mark 79 on January 13, 2024, 09:58:14 PM
    I am re-porting this in hopes that the OP can openly name the major healthcare provider.

    Some people have an exaggerated sense of how exposed their identity is.

    Officer on phone: "Are you male or female?"
    Paranoid on other end of conversation: "I don't want to say."
    Officer: "Come on, it's just your sex. What can I possibly do with that?"
    Paranoid: "I don't know, but I'm afraid to give out anything that might identify me."
    Officer: "How could your sex, male or female, identify you?"
    Paranoid: "Ok, I guess you're right. I'm male."
    Officer: "Oooooh, I got you now! You're John Harrington, aren't you! John Harrington of Toledo, OH. You live on 428 E. 19th St. I'm coming for you right now, you son of a bitch!"
    Paranoid: "shit!" *hangs up phone and runs away*

    See how ridiculous that scenario is?
    Logged
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46864
    • Reputation: +27734/-5149
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #103 on: January 16, 2024, 01:53:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mark 79 on January 13, 2024, 09:58:14 PM
    I am re-porting this in hopes that the OP can openly name the major healthcare provider.

    Yes, this would be good to know, and there's no reason not to share it.  OP is being laid off by the company anyway, and it's certainly public information, as layoffs of that magnitude have to be reported to most states (so they can prepare for the potential impact to unemployment payouts).
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #104 on: January 16, 2024, 04:20:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • OP here: I was waiting to see if press releases were made.  A few news stories and the number is not being reported--just said to be "small".  NOBODY in the company is talking about it.  I have worked here for almost 9 years and not one person has reached out to me.  No chatter on the company Yammer. Clearly people are scared to talk. There is an active subreddit though. We were told up to 35% cuts and furthermore they will continue throughout this year until financial targets are met so that a merger with Cigna can happen.  The company is Humana.  Expect impacts to any government related healthcare, including Tricare, Medicare, and Medicaid.  
    Logged
    Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]
    « previous next »