Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider  (Read 20631 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
« Reply #75 on: January 13, 2024, 11:52:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If you give people advice in areas beyond your experience, then you aren't being helpful.  Bad advice, even if given in charity, is still bad advice.
    This. Gold star comment. People who know what it's like to have to work 20 hour days staring at a computer screen in order to meet a deadline, and then be able to log out for a week to recuperate, IYKYK. But the moment the OP said "tech project mgmt" then basic Catholic humility means that anyone who has no knowledge of tech project mgmt should hold off on irrelevant attention-grabbing opinions. Do show concern and offer a prayer, then decently step aside.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #76 on: January 13, 2024, 11:58:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This. Gold star comment. People who know what it's like to have to work 20 hour days staring at a computer screen in order to meet a deadline, and then be able to log out for a week to recuperate, IYKYK. But the moment the OP said "tech project mgmt" then basic Catholic humility means that anyone who has no knowledge of tech project mgmt should hold off on irrelevant attention-grabbing opinions. Do show concern and offer a prayer, then decently step aside.
    Please do share the "attention grabbing opinions".  And do be ready to prove that they were "attention grabbing".


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #77 on: January 13, 2024, 12:07:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The above quote demonstrates a capacity for elementary maths of 30 years x 145K per year, but not elementary common sense that OP wasn't making 145K each of those years from year 1, nor that OP stashed all that cash and somehow lived for 30 years miraculously without using any of it. Retire already from this argument!

    This!

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #78 on: January 13, 2024, 12:09:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Actually, OP could have retired early with that income and number of years working. It's called reducing your living expenses.

    Unless the $145K was only because they lived in a high cost-of-living area, like California. You can't get California or even Big City income while living in rural Kansas or a flyover state with a low cost-of-living. That would be a sweet deal, but it's not possible. Flyover states and rural areas are great to live in, but the incomes are going to be lower to match.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #79 on: January 13, 2024, 12:15:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Please do share the "attention grabbing opinions".  And do be ready to prove that they were "attention grabbing".
    :jester::facepalm::fryingpan::pray:


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #80 on: January 13, 2024, 12:18:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • :jester::facepalm::fryingpan::pray:
    I see you are unable/want to point out the so-called attention-grabbing posts, so you resort to making fun.  Such Catholic humility!    

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46873
    • Reputation: +27740/-5151
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #81 on: January 13, 2024, 12:21:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The above quote demonstrates a capacity for elementary maths of 30 years x 145K per year, but not elementary common sense that OP wasn't making 145K each of those years from year 1, nor that OP stashed all that cash and somehow lived for 30 years miraculously without using any of it. Retire already from this argument!

    Precisely.  I know from personal experience that 25 years ago I was making $30K as an entry level developer, and it took many years to work my way up to where I'm at, and, by the way, had 6 children, many expenses, experienced some adversities, etc.  I would imagine that the average salary over the 30 years would be more like $75K-$80K, and then you factor taxes into that, and living expenses, which vary depending on the part of the country you live in, how many children you have, other issues you might face (things breaking).  One tiny example is that I've had to get a new washer-dryer set every 4 years.  With all our kids, the thing is constantly running.  I was able to make basic repairs, of course, but then the main computer board would fry, and the cost of just the part was 80% of a new one.  I've also had lots of issues with cars, things like my furnace, a/c, roof, etc. ... all the while dealing with very large food expenditures, etc.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #82 on: January 13, 2024, 12:34:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I see you are unable/want to point out the so-called attention-grabbing posts, so you resort to making fun.  Such Catholic humility!   
    no just not submitting to un Catholic demands. when you say "jump" don't expect everybody to say "how high"


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #83 on: January 13, 2024, 12:44:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • We need to bring back traditional Catholic healthcare with traditional quiet prayer nun nurses and sound faithful Christian doctors. 
    This will happen only after collapse of today's depopulationist "health care system."

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #84 on: January 13, 2024, 12:46:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If you give people advice in areas beyond your experience, then you aren't being helpful.  Bad advice, even if given in charity, is still bad advice.
    It is hoping beyond hope to expect that "trads" will cease being know-nothing know-it-alls.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #85 on: January 13, 2024, 12:49:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Actually, OP could have retired early with that income and number of years working. It's called reducing your living expenses.
    This is truly an ignorant (and envious?) remark.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #86 on: January 13, 2024, 12:58:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It is hoping beyond hope to expect that "trads" will cease being know-nothing know-it-alls.
    not "trads" just human, even if trads forget that they are no less human than non-trads.

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12659
    • Reputation: +8396/-1597
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #87 on: January 13, 2024, 12:59:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • My company is in Round 3 of a RIF (reduction in force) and it's 35% across the org.  I received a weird meeting invite from a VP entitled "Organization Update" and the invitee list is hidden so I don't know if I'm the only one invited or not.  Can't forward it either. 

    I'm feeling nervous because I'm over 50 and I've heard it's very difficult for older workers to get jobs.
    To put this in perspective, is your "major healthcare provider" of such size as, for example, United Health Care or Optum? Kaiser? Banner?

    Can you name the company?  I ask because I'd appreciate some sense of size of the company. If your employer has name recognition, this is a chilling harbinger of an enormous "ripple effect."

    In the face of the perennial nursing shortage, layoff of massive numbers of nurses strikes me as a depopulationist move to enhance the lethality of the next wave bioweapon "pandemic."

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #88 on: January 13, 2024, 01:02:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is truly an ignorant (and envious?) remark.
    :laugh2:

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #89 on: January 13, 2024, 01:09:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So, it's an uncatholic demand to ask you to provide support for your opinion on what YOU think the motives of other posters are (ie. "attention-grabbing" posts)? Actually, what was "unCatholic" was your judging their internal forum.