Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider  (Read 20659 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 2Vermont

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11528
  • Reputation: +6476/-1195
  • Gender: Female
Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
« Reply #60 on: January 12, 2024, 12:14:52 PM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!1
  • Absolutely.  When I was slanderously accused of encouraging someone to defraud an employer, it became necessary.  I had to explain how these 60-day notice periods work, how exempt employment works, and how corporations work in general ... and you still had people who are completely ignorant of the matter doubling down.  This thread was derailed by the initial slanderous accusation made by someone without any knowledge of the situation, thus turning the thread into a "controversial" one.
    No, this thread was never "controversial"...only to you.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46894
    • Reputation: +27756/-5161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #61 on: January 12, 2024, 12:26:21 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • No, this thread was never "controversial"...only to you.

    You're the one who used the term.  See your own post above.


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11528
    • Reputation: +6476/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #62 on: January 12, 2024, 12:40:21 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • You're the one who used the term.  See your own post above.
    Not in reference to this thread. My point was I have been trying to take part in the less controversial threads on this forum.  In other words, one like this one that isn't controversial.  It was simply an anonymous thread where the OP was asking for support/advice, etc. about losing his job ....NOT controversial.  Of course, later on the OP came across as an arrogant, anonymous jerk.  Maybe there's more to his story.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #63 on: January 12, 2024, 12:46:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It was simply an anonymous thread where the OP was asking for support/advice, etc. about losing his job .
    Please quote my request for support/advice.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11528
    • Reputation: +6476/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #64 on: January 12, 2024, 01:00:15 PM »
  • Thanks!10
  • No Thanks!0
  • Please quote my request for support/advice.
    You're right. You never asked explicitly.  You only wrote this in the OP:

    I'm feeling nervous because I'm over 50 and I've heard it's very difficult for older workers to get jobs.

    And the rest of us idiots who felt badly for you chimed in, gave some ideas, said we'd pray for you, etc ,etc but then you showed us!:

    Do you people understand in corporate tech you don't even use references?  The name recognition alone is your reference.  My resume is stacked with Fortune 100 companies and certifications.  I don't use references.  Please get into the 20th century.  One does not simply go become a mortician after investing 30 years in a career that pays $145K a year.  I will get another job because my certifications are highly sought after. Now that tech is having layoffs, contract work will be more available and I will possibly make a third more in my hourly rate anyway.


    So, now you're showing that you're NOT nervous about getting another job.  MMMkay.  Good luck and good riddance.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #65 on: January 12, 2024, 01:05:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You're right. You never asked explicitly.  You only wrote this in the OP:

    I'm feeling nervous because I'm over 50 and I've heard it's very difficult for older workers to get jobs.

    And the rest of us idiots who felt badly for you chimed in, gave some ideas, said we'd pray for you, etc ,etc but then you showed us!:

    Do you people understand in corporate tech you don't even use references?  The name recognition alone is your reference.  My resume is stacked with Fortune 100 companies and certifications.  I don't use references.  Please get into the 20th century.  One does not simply go become a mortician after investing 30 years in a career that pays $145K a year.  I will get another job because my certifications are highly sought after. Now that tech is having layoffs, contract work will be more available and I will possibly make a third more in my hourly rate anyway.

    So, now you're showing that you're NOT nervous about getting another job.  MMMkay.  Good luck and good riddance.
    Heck, the OP is filthy rich to boot having made $4.35 million in her career, she really doesn't even need another job.:fryingpan: 

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4750
    • Reputation: +2897/-667
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #66 on: January 12, 2024, 01:44:36 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • I thought your question "was this necessary?" was meant for the OP. 

    It was, but the other reply was to Lad. The whole thing is being blown way out of proportion. The OP was being rude to Vermont for no reason. 
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11934
    • Reputation: +7293/-500
    • Gender: Female
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #67 on: January 12, 2024, 02:49:15 PM »
  • Thanks!6
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    OP said: Please get into the 20th century. 
    You do know, don't you, that we are now in the 21st century.
    Help of Christians, guard our land from assault or inward stain,
    Let it be what God has planned, His new Eden where You reign.

    +RIP 2024


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46894
    • Reputation: +27756/-5161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #68 on: January 12, 2024, 03:12:18 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Heck, the OP is filthy rich to boot having made $4.35 million in her career, she really doesn't even need another job.:fryingpan:

    Nonsense.  You act as if 1) that money is tax-free and 2) the individual has no expenses.  Depending on where you live, how many children you have, etc. ... one is not necessarily "filthy rich" from $145K per year.  That's nothing in a place like California, where a tiny 3-bed 1-bath home can cost close to a million dollars.  You can't make that judgment without any additional knowledge other than base salary.  Not to mention, that's probably a reflection of OP's current salary, and salaries have been rising with inflation, so I would imagine that the average over 30 years was more like $75-$100K tops.  30 years ago, PMs were lucky to make $30K entry level.  I started as an entry-level developer myself about 25 years ago now, and I was making $30K at the time.  Took me several years before I got into the mid-$50K range, etc. etc.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #69 on: January 12, 2024, 04:42:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Heck, the OP is filthy rich to boot having made $4.35 million in her career, she really doesn't even need another job.:fryingpan:

    How to say "I still live with Mom and Dad" without saying "I still live with Mom and Dad".
    You do know how real life works, don't you? Have you ever supported yourself, even for as little as 6 months? I'm guessing not.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #70 on: January 12, 2024, 05:54:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Actually, OP could have retired early with that income and number of years working. It's called reducing your living expenses. 


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46894
    • Reputation: +27756/-5161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #71 on: January 12, 2024, 06:17:53 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Actually, OP could have retired early with that income and number of years working. It's called reducing your living expenses.

    You know absolutely nothing of OP's expenses, cost of living (can change dramatically depending on which part of the country you live in), number of children, possible medical issues, caring for elderly parents (contributing to them financially) ... and have not factored in that the 145K salary was not consistent for the 30 years, and 30 years ago was probably closer to 30K, perhaps averaging 75-100K over the years, not counting taxes, which would chew up a significant part of that.  You have a real problem here making snap judgments while knowing almost nothing about OP's situation.

    For all you know, OP could live in California, where decent homes cost a million dollars, have 12 children, 6 of whom are in college, and need automobiles, having to pay large medical bills that weren't covered by college, and paying for the care of parents who may need medical or nursing care.  In other words, you know zilch and are making snap judgments.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46894
    • Reputation: +27756/-5161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #72 on: January 12, 2024, 06:18:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How to say "I still live with Mom and Dad" without saying "I still live with Mom and Dad".
    You do know how real life works, don't you? Have you ever supported yourself, even for as little as 6 months? I'm guessing not.

    And I'm guessing being motivated by jealousy regarding the salary (which OP should probably not have revealed).

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #73 on: January 12, 2024, 06:48:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Myself and a few others in a low-cost area of the country (Texas) are writing software that's going to streamline, automate, and allow the company to cut all kinds of management jobs (especially project managers, job schedulers, etc.) because those jobs will be completely redundant after our software is fully complete.
    Does this have anything to do with smartcontracts?

    Offline Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11934
    • Reputation: +7293/-500
    • Gender: Female
    Re: 35% Workforce Reduction at Major Healthcare Provider
    « Reply #74 on: January 12, 2024, 07:00:16 PM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!1
  • And I'm guessing being motivated by jealousy regarding the salary (which OP should probably not have revealed).
    So Blabbermouth needs you to defend his indiscretion. Of course, there is altogether too much guessing, and now you are guessing the motives of one anonymous joker.  This thread should disappear out of sight.

    Help of Christians, guard our land from assault or inward stain,
    Let it be what God has planned, His new Eden where You reign.

    +RIP 2024