Author Topic: Voice of the White House - Jan 5 2007 (Read 823 times)

Trinity · « **Reply #1 on:** January 07, 2007, 07:32:51 PM »

How reliable is this? I hope it is very reliable. I hope it happens soon.

Trinity · « **Reply #2 on:** January 08, 2007, 03:11:06 PM »

I'm serious. How reliable is this Voice of the White House????

antyshemanic · « **Reply #3 on:** January 08, 2007, 03:41:03 PM »

Trinity · « **Reply #4 on:** January 08, 2007, 04:07:40 PM »

Thank you, Anty. Obviously they are a couple of years behind, and perhaps the plans have been modified. But equaly obvious is their determination to carry some plan like it forward. And I'm with the guy about the radiation.

The reason I was especially interested in this latest article is because mad people never prosper. Given that he is nuts enough to go through with this, our best hope is that he is so nuts he destroys himself. I haven't been following his firing of generals, but I believe that history proves that such moves are the undoing of the mover.

I'm wondering. Do you suppose they are waiting for that special "тαℓмυdic" holy date to launch this? Anyway, I hope the Iranians know enough not to keep to schedules, or sleep in the same place twice.

Vandaler · « **Reply #5 on:** January 08, 2007, 06:10:58 PM »

Trinity · « **Reply #6 on:** January 08, 2007, 10:30:24 PM »

Believing or not believing this isn't important. I am just hoping that Bush will take himself out before he succeeds in taking a lot of others out. First we had Clinton's infamous legacy and now this. Almost sixteen years of criminal leadership. You'd think America would wake up and die right.

Vandaler · « **Reply #7 on:** January 09, 2007, 08:01:49 AM »

Quote from: Trinity

Believing or not believing this isn't important. I am just hoping that Bush will take himself out before he succeeds in taking a lot of others out. First we had Clinton's infamous legacy and now this. Almost sixteen years of criminal leadership. You'd think America would wake up and die right.

I guess I did not understand what you meant when you ask twice rather then one if the site is reliable.

And your right, it's not about believing or not believing, it's about wither it can withstand scrutiny. To me anyway, that is the measure of reliability.

Trinity · « **Reply #8 on:** January 09, 2007, 11:58:36 AM »

Well, it's a personal thing. I'm just looking for evidence that his wagon is going to fall apart, in the hopes that he won't be able to get a whole lot more people killed.

The above article does stand up to scrutiny in some respects. We now know that they have been planning an attack on Iran for years. Very possibly it has been held up because Iraq didn't go as planned. And I think every one knows there is something radically wrong with M. Bush, whether they admit it or not. All I'm looking for is the degree of trouble he is in, since there is no doubt that he is in trouble.

Vandaler · « **Reply #9 on:** January 09, 2007, 06:43:06 PM »

Good,

Well, if it's a personal thing, I can give my own personal take on it.

To me, the idea that Harriet Myers quit because her boss "lost his marbles" is weak and self-serving.

Quite simply, and more to the point in my opinion, Bush will need far tougher legal counsel then what Harriet was able to provide. In light of a new Congress who will be far more aggressive, he will need very tough lawyers around him... not a mear work mom like she was.