.
We don't really need any clear video to know that it wasn't an aircraft that did that damage. All you have to do is look at the site and see what debris was left.
Anybody that knows aircraft knows that whatever hit the Pentagon wasn't a two-engine jet, because there would have been two holes in the wall, one for each engine (they're made of titanium), and there would have been NO hole in the wall from the fuselage (made of plexiglass and aluminum). Also there were no aircraft parts at all in the debris -- no landing gear and no engine parts.
Pilots who fly jets like that say they would never be able to steer one to hit a low wall at that speed because the wide wings make the controls unreliable when flying close to the ground. They have enough difficulty with controls when landing the jet, and that's only possible when slowing down under 200 mph. The impact at the Pentagon was at over 500 mph.
There were several walls penetrated and they were several feet thick each, which means there had to be a dense and hard material designed to penetrate obstacles in the front of the rig, like the way a cruise missile is made. It could only have been a cruise missile to do what was done to the Pentagon.
.
Topic: Video showing missile hitting Pentagon on 9-11-01 (Read 3198 times)