Trump has been running his mouth about this new "eternal peace".  To say nothing of the hubris involved in making promises for "eternity", which obviously only God can know and provide ... this sure as heck smells like the peace, the "shalom", leading up to WWIII in the Irlmaier prophecy.  I see pictures on all the mainstream media of both Jews and Arabs (Christian / Muslim and Palestinian / Other) all celebrating this great peace.  So a cease fire, and cessation of hostilities now translates to "eternal peace".

Irlmaier:

“Everything calls for peace, Shalom! Then it will happen: a new war in the Middle East suddenly breaks out, large naval forces confront hostile forces in the Mediterranean, the situation is tense. But the real spark ignites in the Balkans: I see a “big one” fall, a bloody dagger lies beside him, then what follows is blow after blow…”

“Two men kill a third high-ranking man. They were paid by other people… The third murder occurred. Then the war begins… One of the assassins is a small black man, the other a little taller, with brightly colored hair. I think it will be in the Balkans, but I can’t say exactly…”

So, the fact that he uses the term "Shalom" clearly refers to a peace involving Israel, but then he predicts an eruption of hostilities in the Middle East, somehow leading to some massing of forces in the Mediterranean, but the theater suddenly changes when this assassination occurs in the (Balkans?).  He doesn't seem sure of Balkans, so IMO, Czech Republic might make more sense, since at one point he mentions the Golden City being "destroyed" (Golden City = Prague), though it could possibly be in a later phase.

We know of course that that men in small hats do not want peace and only temporarily / tentatively agree to such things for practical reasons and just to set up their next moves.  Perhaps they just needed a breather, a timeout, before resuming the annihilation of non-Jews.

1 But of the times and moments, brethren, you need not, that we should write to you; 2 For yourselves know perfectly, that the day of the Lord shall so come, as a thief in the night. 3 For when they shall say, peace and security; then shall sudden destruction come upon them, as the pains upon her that is with child, and they shall not escape.

1 Thess. 5:1-3


Hmmm......

Indeed ... Thanks for posting, just couldn't recall where that was.  I think there's some other Catholic prophecy out there.

Notice also that they're saying that the hostages are going to be released on Monday ... which puts it at ... October 13.

That could in fact be the beginning of the chastisement foretold by Our Lady.  We know that God doesn't pick dates randomly, and so May 13 - October 13 were not chosen randomly.

July 13, 1917 was when Our Lady first said that she would return to request the consecration of Russia.
June 13, 1929 ... Tuy:  Our Lady appears to Sister Lucia to request the consecratoin of Russia.
Summer of 1931 ... Rianjo:  Our Lord appears to Sister Lucia complaining that the Popes had not heeded Our Lady's request.

Sister Lucia does not give a date, just "Summer of 1931" for the Rianjo incident, but IMO quite likely June 13 or July 13.

Per Sister Lucia, this is what Our Lord told her then ...

Make it known to My ministers that, given they follow the example of the King of France in delaying the execution of My command, they will follow him into misfortune.  They did not wish to heed My request.  Like the King of France, they will repent of it, and they will do it, but it will be late.  Russia will have already spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions against the Church.  The Holy Father will have much to suffer!

Notice that within two years (speaking to the urgency of the request and its prompt fulfillment) Our Lord was already complaining that they had not heeded the request, during the reign of Pius XI, the pope who having been trained as a diplomat once reportedly said something along the lines of how he would make a deal with the devil if necessary in order to benefit the Church.  Didn't work out too well for the Cristeros ....

Interestingly, June 13, 1929 was shortly after the Lateran Treaty had been signed, making the Vatican an independent nation.  Signed February 11, 1929.  Took effect June 7, 1929 ... and then Our Lady appeared at Tuy on June 13, 1929 to request the consecration of Russia.

This does, quite interestingly, line up with the Dimond Brothers' reference to the "10 Kings" of Revelation being the 10 Popes and/or Anti-Popes who had reigned since 1929 (inclusive), since they would in fact have been the sovereigns of the Vatican State beginning in 1929.  Perhaps this was the beginning of the Vatican's dealings with the devil.

At Tuy, in 1929, Our Lord was likening the refusal of the Pope(s) (then Pius XI) to consecrate Russia (believing that he could do better with his diplomatic skills, dealing with the devil, than Our Lady could), to what happened with the King(s) of France.

June 17, 1689:  Our Lord requests that the King of France consecrate the nation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus.
[request not heeded]
June 17, 1789:  Third Estate established, declaring the monarchy subordinated to the Third estate.

approximately 3.5 years later (January 21, 1793) ... King (Louis XVI) formally executed -- followed by the execution of the Queen Marie Antoinette on October 16, 1793.

So I've drawn the conclusion that something MAJOR will happen on June 13, 2029 ... IMO, the beginning of a great chastisement ... which will then be resolved about 3.5 years later, i.e. in January of 2033, with a beginning of the Triumph of the Church, since at that time the Holy Pope wil be elected, just in the nick of time, and UNLIKE the Kings, just before it was too late (Our Lord said it would be done, but late), that Pope will finally consecrate Russia, and then things will turn so that by the Spring (perhaps Easter) of 2033, 2000 years after the First Easter, the Church will have Triumhed (perhaps just for  atime)

As I said, God does not choose dates randomly.

Interestingly just shy of 75 years will have passed between the selection / installing of Roncalli as "John XXIII" and January 2033.  Why interesting?  One account of the vision had by Pope Leo XIII referred to the devil having ascendance and "greater power" for a period of 75 years.

So, this vision reportedly took place on October 13, 1884, exactly 33 years before the final apparition at Fatima on October 13, 1917 (that number 33 again).  Our Lord was 33 when crucified, in 33, and then 2033 might be the Triumph of the Church.

Immediately after that vision, Leo XIII composed the prayer to St. Michael, likely providing some hints and details about what he say, and of course there's the famous passage about the shepherd having been struck and the sheep scattered ... which is precisely what happened starting with John XXIII (whether you take "struck" in the SV sense or the R&R sense, no Trad can deny that in some way the Shepherd had been struck).

After (and in response to) the vision, Pope Leo composed the prayer to St. Michael and then had the longer form included in the Rituale Romanum as an exorcism, in the 1890 edition.

Ecclesiam, sponsam Agni immaculatam, astutissimi hostes repleverunt amaritudinibus; inebriarunt eam absinthio; posuerunt impias manus in omnia quae desiderabilia sunt in ea.  Ubi sedes beatissimi Petri et Cathedra veritatis constituta est ad lucem gentium, ibi thronum posuerunt abominationis et impietatis suae; ut, percusso pastore, et gregem disperdere valeant.

These most cunning enemies have filled with bitterness the Church, the spouse of the Immaculate Lamb, and have laid impious hands upon all that is most sacred in her.  Where the See of the most blessed Peter and the Chair of Truth has been set up as the light of the world, there they have placed the throne of their abomination and impiety, so that, when the Pastor has been struck, the flock may be scattered.

So, the very peculiar thing about this prayer that I have not seen anyone notice, is that Pope Leo XIII is using the PAST TENSE, where they "HAVE LAID" their impious hands on the Church and they "HAVE PLACED" the throne of their abomination and impiety (so that whent he Pastor has been struck, the flock may be scattered).

Why the PAST TENSE?  So, two reasons.  This appears to CONFIRM that this prayer was composed by Leo XIII after the vision, in reponse to something he SAW, or HAD SEEN.  So, when composing the prayers, he's looking at it from within the vision where the events herein have happened already.

On October 28, 1958 ... they, these "most cunning enemies" replaced the See of Blessed Peter with the "throne of their abomination and impiety" ... the Conciliar AntiPopes.  This will presumably last 75 years, until 2033, which is also 3.5 years past the 100-year mark of Our Lady having requested the Consecration of Russia.

So, this has me thinking.  While the Vatican released instructions that this Exorcism Prayer should NOT be said by the faithful, I wonder if given the PAST TENSE Leo XIII didn't intend for this prayer to be said IN PARTICULAR TODAY.  Should all priests TODAY, Traditional priests, not be saying this Exorcism Prayer to help drive these wicked and diabolical enemies from the Church?

I believe so.