I just had a skim-read of that PDF. It is full of masonic waffle. I am not an astrophysicist/astronomer (that would have been fun, except for the late nights!), but the references to ancient symbolism, although interesting, were a bit off the mark in places.

That said, it could still be a real object in space that is going to disrupt things when it passes us over. The problem with "certain" events is that the powers-that-be are well placed to profit from those events, especially if they are of astronomical proportions. The 3DD is fair game and worth preparing for, but this is more than likely full of disinformation.

As for where to buy real estate? Never buy at the seaside, always on a hill and ideally with an underground spring or somewhere where the bore water is safe to drink. That's just commonsense!

Apparently the comet exploded.

I have been reading about the electrical theories of the sun and space, and I have to say it is far more intuitive and understandable to me than other theories such as gravitational theory.

It explains how a comet can have this huge bright tail (but only under certain circuмstances), yet stay a comet for thousands and thousands of years. Its tail only needs to be made of a tiny number of atoms which are supercharged to emit the bright light that it does - and all this can be achieved through electromagnetic radiation and not heat (since the comets remain frozen).

Has anyone ever wondered why Jupiter, the most massive planet, is in the MIDDLE of the planets in our solar system?  While I am no astronomer and this point might be completely 'unscientific,', it would seem the planets should increase in mass as they go outward from the sun, Mercury being the closest and Jupiter being the farthest away -- unless something else is exerting its magnetic force, too.

Jupiter has something like 20-25 times the mass of Saturn, yet Saturn is FARTHER from the sun.  If there is NO OTHER body exerting magnetic force upon either of them, Saturn should be CLOSER to the sun -- but it is not.  Why?

The actual orbit of an object depends on its total mass (not size) and velocity. The further out an object is, the slower it must travel, or else it will escape its orbit. What the object is made of is probably determined by whatever substances were around in that region (that distance out from the Sun) at the time the object was formed, and whether those substances would remain intact a that distance from the Sun (and therefore the Sun's behavior over time). So it would follow that gaseous planets are unlikely to survive nearer to the Sun than they currently are.