Author Topic: The Syria Strikes: A Conspiracy Theory (Read 1030 times)

RomanCatholic1953 · « **on:** April 14, 2017, 07:42:06 PM »

The Syria Strikes: A conspiracy Theory

The Corbett Report/Video

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #1 on:** April 16, 2017, 09:20:16 PM »

U.S. INTELLIGENCE SOURCE: SYRIA CHEMICAL WEAPONS ATTACK LAUNCHED FROM SAUDI BASE
Published: April 12, 2017
Share | Print This

Award-winning Iran-Contra journalist Robert Parry says the chemical weapons attack in Syria was launched from a joint Saudi-Israeli special operations base in Jordan, according to his intelligence sources.

U.S. intelligence analysts determined that a drone was responsible for the attack and “eventually came to believe that the flight was launched in Jordan from a Saudi-Israeli special operations base for supporting Syrian rebels,” according to the source.

“The suspected reason for the poison gas was to create an incident that would reverse the Trump administration’s announcement in late March that it was no longer seeking the removal of President Bashar al-Assad,” writes Parry.

As we highlighted back in 2013 after another chemical weapons attack in Ghouta that was blamed on Assad, rebels freely admitted to Associated Press correspondent Dale Gavlak that they had been given the weapons by Saudi Arabia but had “handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions.”

Parry’s background lends the information credibility. He covered the Iran-Contra scandal for the Associated Press and Newsweek and was later given a George Polk award for his work on intelligence matters.

The contention that the incident was a “fαℓѕє fℓαg” to create a justification for air strikes has also been voiced by former Congressman Ron Paul as well as numerous other prominent voices, including Vladimir Putin himself, who went on to warn that rebels could now stage a similar incident in Damascus to goad the U.S. into toppling Assad.

Whoever was responsible for the attack does not take away from the horror of the event and the fact that innocent people and children died.

Parry dismissed the four page report released by President Trump’s National Security Council that blames the Syrian government for the chemical attack as being heavy on assertions but lacking actual evidence.

The white paper states, “we cannot publicly release all available intelligence on this attack due to the need to protect sources and methods,” although as Parry points out, “In similarly tense situations in the past, U.S. Presidents have released sensitive intelligence to buttress U.S. government assertions, including John F. Kennedy’s disclosure of U-2 spy flights in the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis and Ronald Reagan revealing electronic intercepts after the Soviet shoot-down of Korean Airlines Flight 007 in 1983.”

Parry challenged the Trump administration to make its evidence publicly available, while also questioning why both CIA Director Mike Pompeo and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats were not show in a photo released by the White House which shows the President and a dozen of his senior advisers monitoring the April 6 missile strike from a room at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.

“Given President Trump’s spotty record for getting facts straight – he and his administration should go the extra mile in presenting irrefutable evidence to support its assessments, not simply insisting that the world must “trust us,” concludes Parry.

Source: blacklistednews.com

[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]

SHARE THIS ARTICLE...
Share Twitter Facebook Google+StumbleUpon Email Pinterest Reddit[/font][/size]

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #2 on:** April 17, 2017, 03:12:47 PM »

by RBN

TWISTED: According to bizarre Pentagon logic, Russia can now bomb the USA to stop vaccine violence against children
April 14, 2017 in News by RBN

If you really look deeply at the “moral justification” behind the recent U.S. military strike in Syria, it all comes down to this simple argument: “Those children were being hurt by chemical violence, and we just HAD to do something to stop them!”
Therefore, according to the Pentagon, anytime a nation anywhere in the world believes another nation is doing something to harm its children with chemicals, they have the right to launch missile strikes, drop bombs or do anything necessary to stop what they see as an “chemical violence” against children.
No declaration of war is required. No United Nations resolutions are needed. There’s not even any requirement for a single shred of independent evidence to support the claim that “children are being harmed.” All that’s needed now is for a country to simply assert that they believe children are being harmed, and the bombs begin to fly!
The Pentagon essentially argues that Russia has the right to bomb the USA to stop vaccine violence or glyphosate poisoning of children.
The Pentagon essentially argues that Russia has the right to bomb the USA to stop vaccine violence or glyphosate poisoning of children
If this is the new standard for justifying acts of war, then surely other countries will invoke the same reasoning to launch military strikes against the United States. After all, it wouldn’t be difficult for Russia to argue that the corrupt U.S. government is working in conspiracy with the biotech industry to feed toxic glyphosate weed killer to childrenacross the country, thus justifying Russia’s own Pentagon-like military intervention to “save the children” from “chemical violence.”
After all, sarin gas is by no means the only form of chemical violence against children in our world. Lots of chemicals cause violence, including many chemicals used asingredients in vaccines such as mercury, aluminum, monosodium glutamate and formaldehyde. Some children are maimed or even killed by vaccines, and it’s all suppressed by the CDC and the vaccine industry. Other children are horribly disfigured, yet the same U.S. media that repeatedly broadcast videos of Syrian children harmed by an alleged gas attack won’t dare show images of American children who are horribly harmed by vaccines. Instead, heartless, soulless comedians like Jimmy Kimmel make fun of those children and their parents, mocking them as anti-vaxxers on broadcast television:

Invoking the same twisted Pentagon logic, China might one day declare that the criminal CDC is “assaulting U.S. children with deadly vaccines” while covering up the evidence of vaccine violence, thereby justifying in their minds a Chinese military strike on Washington D.C. After all, the Pentagon just said they had to launch missiles at the “infrastructure” in Syria that was used to bring harm to children in Syria. Would the Pentagon approve of a similar action where China bombs the CDC to “save children” from the chemical violence of the CDC and the vaccine industry? It would be absurd, of course. But that’s essentially what the Pentagon is arguing in the case of Syria.
After all, as I’ve pointed out on Natural News, there are far more vaccine-damaged children in America than sarin gas-damaged children in Syria. It’s actually no comparison. The U.S. government, through the corrupt U.S. Centers for Disease Control and a vaccine industry that’s literally run by criminal felons and international fugitives like Poul Thorsen, is assaulting U.S. children every day with chemical violence in the form of vaccines.
The secretive U.S. vaccine court has already paid out over $3 billion in damages to vaccine-damaged children. There’s no question that vaccines, as currently formulated, area form of chemical violence against children. Does that mean that, according to Pentagon logic, every other nation on the planet has the right to unleash kinetic weapons of destruction in order to stop the U.S. government’s violence against America’s children? Gosh I hope not. Because that would mean the U.S. could be attacked by every other nation in the world by invoking the same justification as the Pentagon: “We just HAD to do something to save those children!”

The U.S. government deploys chemical violence against America’s children on a daily basis
As I’ve pointed out numerous times, including in the podcast below, the United States government openly calls for the use of chemical violence against children every single day. It’s called “vaccines,” and the vaccine industry easily kills more children around the world than all acts of terrorism combined. In just one vaccination event in a Mexican town, for example, 75% of the children who were vaccinated ended up hospitalized or dead.
Furthermore, the vaccine industry adamantly refuses to remove the toxic ingredients (like mercury) from vaccines, knowing that so many children have already been damaged, they can’t admit NOW that the ingredients are dangerous. So they keep poisoning more children with “vaccine violence,” while attacking whistleblowers like CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson who want to save children as being “anti-vaxxers” (the racial slur n-word equivalent of the vaccine industry).
The message to America? Violence against children is perfectly okay as long as it comes from the government. Yet when the Syrian government allegedly uses chemical violence against Syrian children, that’s suddenly the worst crime in the world, demanding an immediate act of war to “save the children.”
Do I need to even tell you what a monumental mind-warping propaganda campaign is being carried out on the brainwashed population to get people to swallow all those official lies?
If violence against children is really the justification for invoking yet more violence to stop the first violence, then does that mean the U.S. government condones the use of force or violence to halt all forms of chemical violence against children that are deployed domestically, too? Because it’s quite clear that the Pentagon — and even President Trump himself — just gave every nation on the planet permission to use whatever force is necessary to protect children from violence of any kind. Does this mean that Iran, where abortion is illegal, can now launch a nuclear missile at the United States in order to stop partial-birth abortions because Iran sees such abortions as violence against children? It all gets pretty twisted, doesn’t it?
My position: Violence against children is ALWAYS wrong, including vaccine violence
o be clear about my own position in all this, I believe that violence against children is always wrong. This includes kinetic violence, abusive verbal violence, chemical violence and vaccine violence. My hope is that future children can grow up in a world where they are not poisoned by weed killer herbicides in their food, toxic pesticides in the drinking water or brain-damaging heavy metals in vaccines.
I want children to be safe from all forms of violence, including medical violence and vaccine violence. For believing in that, I am censored by Facebook, demonized by the medical establishment and punished by Google with outrageous tactics of oppression. The same status quo that supports missile strikes in Syria to “save the children,” in other words, openly attacks and smears anyone who seeks to save the children in America. (Related: Follow more news about medical violence against children in America at MedicalViolence.com)
And what does that tell you, really, about how little the establishment actually cares about children in the first place? If the lives of Syrian children are so valuable that they invoke a military strike, aren’t the lives of U.S. children valuable enough to stop poisoning them with mercury in vaccines?
Listen to my full podcast on all this at the Health Ranger Report, or watch the videos below:
See Podcast go to link:
http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/twisted-according-to-bizarre-pentagon-logic-russia-can-now-bomb-the-usa-to-stop-vaccine-violence-against-children/

White Wolf · « **Reply #3 on:** May 09, 2017, 04:10:56 PM »

One of the people pictured in his "do not exist" column is Canadian reporter Eva Bartlett, probably the best expert of the true situation in Syria. Unfortunately, most Americans have had their vision of their military nurtured by GI Joe cartoons and Rambo movies, and the effort to nudge these people out of sheeple space is hard in the extreme. Even the SSPX has been invaded and co-opted by the Neocons. I will never forget the groans in Kansas City when I asked why Bishop Fellay was not defending Bishop Williamson as per his opinion on the h0Ɩ0h0αx. Fr Schmidberger replied that if the SSPX supports him, Germany would pull their accreditation of the SSPX schools, and perhaps even close them. So we go to the catacombs? What a novel concept. Actually, the Church should have gone underground after the French revolution. Shame on Pope Pius VII for signing that concordat with Napoleon. Shame on Pius XI for trying to make peace with the Masonic revolution of Italy. The politics of the Vatican since 1848 has confused countless souls, and now we are watching the descent to the utterly black depths of "religious liberty". Consequently, the effort at pounding sense into these people is about as successful as teaching a Border Collie to do algebra. They have been so thoroughly brainwashed that they will quote popes against Catholic teaching, as if every utterance of a Pre-Vatican II pope was infallible. Basically, I predict that the reaction to Corbett's work, which is spot on, will be to say:

BUT HE CRITICIZED DONALD TRUMP... :baby:

Our Lady of Fatima, Pray for us, You are our only hope.

Author Topic: The Syria Strikes: A Conspiracy Theory (Read 1030 times)

RomanCatholic1953

The Syria Strikes: A Conspiracy Theory

RomanCatholic1953

Re: The Syria Strikes: A Conspiracy Theory

RomanCatholic1953

Re: The Syria Strikes: A Conspiracy Theory

White Wolf

A great video from Corbett Report, almost as good as 911 in 5 minutes.