Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => World War III - Chapter 2 => Topic started by: Incredulous on June 06, 2013, 01:55:40 PM
-
This explains Russia's hasty military moves to stabilize the region.
Did Syria sink an Israeli sub? (http://www.stewwebb.com/2013/06/02/did-syria-sink-an-israeli-submarine/ )
Syria hit with tactical nuke (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vm7ObVSix7w&feature=player_detailpage)
-
Wow, I wonder if these stories are true.
-
It's good to know those subs are vulnerable. Perhaps someday Israel can be safely disarmed.
-
I read about this too but am still waiting to see if corroborating evidence surfaces (literally and figuratively). I am also wondering why the top secret location and design plans of what can only be one of Israel's nuclear ICBM facilities was published by the US Government "by accident". Maybe Russia and US are both trying to avoid global war, for now at least.
-
It's good to know those subs are vulnerable. Perhaps someday Israel can be safely disarmed.
I wonder what weapon they hit that little spy sub with ?
Of course, the crew will be listed in their holo-caustianity "hall of martyrs"
-
Are we sure it's not a hoax?
-
Are we sure it's not a hoax?
I bet Hugh Adkins doesn't think it's a hoax?
(https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQXx2p-qyWpviBnX16QlCQEHCd3HpAu-r-xiDHgaBsGqcwlpG-wOw)
The fact is, Israel did attack Syria, we just didn't get the details of the attack.
It also explains why Russia suddenly inserted their navy and army into the area, without asking for UN approval.
-
Are we sure it's not a hoax?
The fact is, Israel did attack Syria, we just didn't get the details of the attack.
It also explains why Russia suddenly inserted their navy and army into the area, without asking for UN approval.
I agree there is probably some truth to this, but maybe it was a Russian vessel rather than a Syrian one that did this. We really are on the very edge of global nuclear war.
-
Make sure you have at least the MATERIALS to BUILD an underground shelter, in the case of fallout affecting your area.
Expedient ("emergency") shelters can be built in a couple days, assuming you have 2 or more able-bodied people in your household.
More people will die from fallout than in the actual blast zones.
Those who die in the blast(s) will die instantaneously as they are incinerated.
Those who die in the outlying areas will die, very slowly, from radiation poisoning. Nausea, vomiting, hair falling out, weakness, etc. But the problem is, it's not just you. You will have to watch this happen to your wife, little children, etc. and they might not take it as "stoically" as you might.
And we Catholics can't take the "easy way out" and do something desperate like a murder-ѕυιcιdє. Non-Catholics would find that very tempting in a fallout scenario.
Like I said -- be prepared. Have some shovels, pickaxes, maybe some scrap lumber, nails, 5 gallon buckets (for water, sanitation), work gloves, an extra air filter or two, etc.
In general, it's a good idea to have "practical items" in your basement, garage, etc. You never know when you're going to need rope, netting, dust masks, etc.
Unfortunately, the stuff you want to collect is the stuff that smart people NEVER sell at garage sales. Christmas trees, halloween decorations, breadmakers, and old magazines aren't very useful for survival :)
That having been said, you CAN get lucky if you keep trying. I like to go to the large "subdivision-wide" garage sales.
-
And if you'd like to make a pot of survivalist "Mouse stew", this is a good way to do it:
Redneck Mouse Trap (http://www.lolbrary.com/content/323/redneck-mousetrap-44323.gif)
-
It's good to know those subs are vulnerable. Perhaps someday Israel can be safely disarmed.
I wonder what weapon they hit that little spy sub with ?
Of course, the crew will be listed in their holo-caustianity "hall of martyrs"
Oh yes. In particular since this sub-marine which "Israel" used was actually a German one. Newspaper title: "h0Ɩ0h0αx survivors sunk in nαzι submarine!"
(You know who invented the "nαzι" fake word? Yes, the Six Million fans (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/nαzι).)
This submarine is a class Dolphin one; these are sophisticated modern submarines which are hardly locatable (e-motors I think). We German slaves had to build and "donate" five or six of these expensive ones to the Zionists during the recent years, and the submarine's missile silos can also take atom missiles.
Our streets are kaputt, our schools fall apart, our elders can hardly live anymore from pension, but we vassals have to contribute all the good stuff to our masters... Yes, my US-American friends, we are all their vassals.
Anyway, since the signs and signposts in these Dolphin submarines are written in German, maybe the Jєωιѕн crew was unable to correctly use the submarine, or maybe they were so annoyed by all these "nαzι" letters around them, that they could only think about the h0Ɩ0h0αx and totally lost sight of the enemy. :-) German high-class workmanship in the hands of the eldest enemies of Our Lord is utterly useless and better sinks to the bottom of the sea...
If the sunk story is true, I don't know, but if it is true, then indeed the question is: what weapon used the Syrians or Russians to sink that technological masterpiece in the wrong hands?
-
My feeling is that there is a concerted effort by many major players, including some in the US, to remind Israel just how vulnerable it is. Israel is a nation which is ultimately out of control, a monster that the US, France and UK have created that is now a threat to them (surely they knew this would happen, right? Yes, because the key decisions in those countries on this matter were made by Jєωs). America should feel threatened by Israel's ICBM capability which can wipe out the US in two or three missile launches. This could indeed happen. China and Russia are also worried, but the submarine incident might be a sign that German military research is compromised. Israel's defenses do appear to be wide open in some important respects.
Russia has repeatedly hinted that Israel's defenses which were supplied by the US, are imperfect and would not withstand a relatively inexpensive onslaught.
-
Note of course we have no idea whether any of this really occurred.
-
Good point Mathew. Being prepared is integral. Having a network of like minded Catholics is also important, since you willneed to trust somebody. Guns are an absolute necessity.
-
It's good to know those subs are vulnerable. Perhaps someday Israel can be safely disarmed.
I wonder what weapon they hit that little spy sub with ?
Of course, the crew will be listed in their holo-caustianity "hall of martyrs"
Oh yes. In particular since this sub-marine which "Israel" used was actually a German one. Newspaper title: "h0Ɩ0h0αx survivors sunk in nαzι submarine!"
(You know who invented the "nαzι" fake word? Yes, the Six Million fans (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/nαzι).)
This submarine is a class Dolphin one; these are sophisticated modern submarines which are hardly locatable (e-motors I think). We German slaves had to build and "donate" five or six of these expensive ones to the Zionists during the recent years, and the submarine's missile silos can also take atom missiles.
Our streets are kaputt, our schools fall apart, our elders can hardly live anymore from pension, but we vassals have to contribute all the good stuff to our masters... Yes, my US-American friends, we are all their vassals.
Anyway, since the signs and signposts in these Dolphin submarines are written in German, maybe the Jєωιѕн crew was unable to correctly use the submarine, or maybe they were so annoyed by all these "nαzι" letters around them, that they could only think about the h0Ɩ0h0αx and totally lost sight of the enemy. :-) German high-class workmanship in the hands of the eldest enemies of Our Lord is utterly useless and better sinks to the bottom of the sea...
If the sunk story is true, I don't know, but if it is true, then indeed the question is: what weapon used the Syrians or Russians to sink that technological masterpiece in the wrong hands?
Ethelred,
To add to your input, my friend advised that the the sub wreckage was retrieved and that the remains held a US Tomahawk (nuclear armed) missile.
So, this small vessel's mission was more like that of an assassin.
Sneak close, launch, pull-out and blame it on the American Navy... or some fαℓѕє fℓαg like that.
It fits our elders brother's MO, to always knife you in the back, and in the dark.
No wonder they wanted to suppress this story.
-
Is there any real confirmation regarding the nuke?
-
Does anyone know if this story is true.
-
It's nonsense. I wish it were true though.
-
This explains Russia's hasty military moves to stabilize the region.
Did Syria sink an Israeli sub? (http://www.stewwebb.com/2013/06/02/did-syria-sink-an-israeli-submarine/ )
Syria hit with tactical nuke (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vm7ObVSix7w&feature=player_detailpage)
That isn't a nuke. Even a small "tactical" nuke would be blindingly bright-not orangeish like in the video. This is probably an exploding ammo dump. I saw the cloud once when it happened by accident at a National Guard armory near us several years ago. It formed a cloud that looked a lot like a nuke.
-
Veteranstoday still thinks it was a nuke. Disinformation probably.
-
Obama Backs First-Strike Nuclear War as U.S. Policy
By Francis A. Boyle
June 24, 2013 "Information Clearing House - I have now had the chance to read Obama’s Report on Nuclear Employment Strategy of the United States, that just came out on Friday, June 21, 2013. The critical passage can be found on page 5:
“The 2010 Nuclear Posture Review established the Administration’s goal to set conditions that would allow the United States to safely adopt a policy of making deterrence of nuclear attack the sole purpose of U.S. nuclear weapons. Although we cannot adopt such a policy today, the new guidance re-iterates the intention to work towards that goal over time.”
In other words, “nuclear deterrence” is not now and has not been the policy of the Obama administration going back to and including their 2010 Nuclear Posture Review as well. Since “nuclear deterrence” is not now and has never been the Obama administration’s nuclear weapons policy from the get-go, then by default this means that offensive first-strike strategic nuclear war fighting is now and has always been the Obama administration’s nuclear weapons policy. This policy will also be pursued and augmented by means of “integrated non-nuclear strike options.” Id.
Therefore the entire 2013 NPR and Obama’s recent nuclear arms “reduction” proposals must be understood within this context of the United States pursuing an offensive, strategic first-strike nuclear war-fighting capability as augmented by non-nuclear strike forces:
“After a comprehensive review of our nuclear forces, the President has determined that we can ensure the security of the United States and our Allies and partners and maintain a strong and credible strategic deterrent while safely pursuing a one-third reduction in deployed nuclear weapons from the level established in the New START Treaty.” Id. at 6.
And we know now for sure that all the Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) systems that Obama is currently in the process of deploying in Europe, Asia, and the United States, on land, at sea and perhaps in Outer Space are designed to provide the United States with a strategic, offensive, first strike nuclear war fighting capability against Russia and China and Iran and North Korea and Syria for starters. The latter three because the United States has taken the position that they are not in compliance with their obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: “…the United States has relied increasingly on non-nuclear elements to strengthen regional security architectures, including a forward U.S. conventional presence and effective theater ballistic missile defenses…” Id. at 9.
So the United States government is currently preparing to launch, wage and win an offensive, first-strike strategic nuclear war against Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and Syria. All the rest is just palaver. Including by our Dissembler-in-Chief. An “honors” graduate of Harvard Law School.
Francis A. Boyle is a graduate of the University of Chicago and Harvard Law School. He has advised numerous international bodies in the areas of human rights, war crimes, genocide, nuclear policy, and bio warfare. He received a PHD in political science from Harvard University.