Only in U.S. Can You Destroy Another State's Plane In Their Own Country And Call It "Self-defense" By Holisticgreen June 20, 2017 "Information Clearing House (http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/)" - Let's see how the Corporate Media is going to spin this one! The cat is out of the bag: the United States is the main sponsor of terrorism, using its henchmen - ISIS - to commit unspeakable acts, in pursuit of regime change, oil, gas and other spoils for the corporate state. Another Step Toward Devastating War An American pilot shot down a Syrian fighter that was attacking ISIS, thus confirming that Washington is not fighting ISIS, as Washington claims, but is protecting ISIS, its agent sent to Syria by Obama and Hillary to overthrow the Syrian government. General Michael Flynn revealed on a TV interview that Obama and Hillary had, over his objection as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, made the “willful decision” to send ISIS to Syria. Washington’s pretense that Washington is fighting ISIS, rather than supporting it, is the excuse for Washington’s illegal presence in the Syrian conflict. Russia and Iran are in Syria legally, invited there by an elected government. The Americans are there uninvited as war criminals. Under international law established by the Americans themselves, it is a war crime to initiate aggression against a country that has not raised a fist against you. So, to be in Syria, Washington has to pretend to be “fighting terrorism” rather than supporting it. The lie has been given to this claim many times, but now that an American pilot has proven that the US is in Syria to support its agent, ISIS, not even a Megyn Kelly presstitute can honestly claim to believe that Washington is fighting ISIS.http://bit.ly/2tn9MjR (http://bit.ly/2tn9MjR) Russia to track US planes as 'targets' as Syria tensions boil over Russia says US downing of Syrian jet was 'act of aggression' and that planes west of Euphrates river will be tracked as 'aerial targets' http://bit.ly/2rKXN2j (http://bit.ly/2rKXN2j) The Pentagon Responds with: "US Pilots Will Defend Themselves If Attacked By Russians" Really? Why not get out of Syria? We have no business there! The American People have been very clear in their request: "No war with Syria!" US public opposes war despite media propaganda The war is not popular with Americans. In fact, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll found that only nine percent of Americans support a military attack on Syria. This makes a war on Syria even less popular than Congress. The poll was taken while reports of the chemical attack were in the news. There has been consistent propaganda for war on all the networks for months now, but the people are not buying it. ( 2013) http://bit.ly/2rxJrhH (http://bit.ly/2rxJrhH) Polls show Americans don't want war in Syria The public is also concerned about the repercussions against the U.S. in the region that would result from an attack on Syria. Three in four (74 percent) believe there would be a backlash against the U.S. in the Middle East in the aftermath of an American attack. The public has a better understanding of lessons learned in the region than most policymakers do. Americans are just tired of war and who can blame them? (2013) http://bit.ly/2rykClu (http://bit.ly/2rykClu) A recent poll shows that Americans have not changed their minds about a war with Syria: Poll: Most Americans Don’t Want U.S. Troops in Syria "Only one in five Americans favor an increased U.S. troop presence in Syria, according to the results of a CBS News poll released Monday. (April 2017) http://bit.ly/2tI2Qx4 (http://bit.ly/2tI2Qx4) The world is now perhaps closer to World War Three than it has been in five decades as the situation in Syria is heating up yet again. In less than 24 hours, the United States has attacked the Syrian military, Iran has launched missiles into Syria, Russia is threatening to shoot down American planes, and the United States is digging in its heels and threatening to continue to provoke both the Russians and the Syrians.
While that about sums up the current micro-version of the situation, it’s important to get a rundown of just what led up to the precipice we are all standing on. http://bit.ly/2tI4E9d (http://bit.ly/2tI4E9d) [/font] [font={defaultattr}] The problem is that Washington won’t accept a half-loaf solution because it remains committed to its goal of breaking up Syria, removing Assad, and controlling the vital resources in the Middle East in order to maintain its global primacy. It’s going to take time and patience to discourage Washington’s aggressive behavior. There’s no easy fix. The resistance must be firm but flexible. Their national interests must be defended, but a broader war must be avoided. Washington must be gradually acclimated to the idea that it no longer rules the world, that its interests aren’t served by its erratic and destabilizing foreign policy, and that it must comply with international law. Nudging the United States in the direction of a multipolar world in which its own narrow interests are not paramount, is going to take time. But what other choice is there; World War 3? Let’s hope not. http://bit.ly/2sNsdRG (http://bit.ly/2sNsdRG) [/font]
- See more at: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47280.htm#sthash.jk9SOlK0.dpuf [/font] |