They have all have made reference to Russian conversion since the start of the Ukraine war.
You were either too busy making your lengthy, daily postings on Cathinfo... or probably... you just slept through it.

You should be banned for grave calumny and slander.  You're an utter disgrace and need to examine your conscience.

Cite a text from any of these (except, say, E Michael Jones, since I don't really follow him) that Russia has converted.

I have followed the others quite closely, and I have never heard any of them claim that Russia has converted.  Only the Dimond Brothers have said this, and that's only because they look at the term translated as "convert" from Our Lady at Fatima, and assert that this does not mean a true conversion to the faith, but more loosely something along the lines of changing course.

Only a heretic would claim that the Orthodox can be referred as "converted" (in the strict Catholic sense, vs. the looser Dimond interpretation of the term), so what you're alleging of the is in fact tantamount to calumniating and slandering them as heretics.

So either produce the evidence or retract your calumnies.

If Russia does fully convert at some point and leads a Catholic restoration around the world what do you think this would look like. Would the Russian Orthodox Church regain communion with the Pope of Rome?

Conversion means that they would become Catholic.  To call anything else conversion (barring a different translation of the term by the Dimonds or others) would not be Catholic.

"On paper, the owner of Scheherazade is non-sanctioned Russian billionaire Eduard Khudainatov, whom authorities believe acts as “straw man” for Amadea too, the superyacht arrested in Fiji by the U.S. government. In reality, the real beneficiary of Scheherazade is probably Putin, aka the number-one on all sanctions lists for his brutal invasion of Ukraine."

Jєωtini's the crazy genie's under grave suspicion as far as I'm concerned. "Globohomo" whatever. Dugin's a fag and everybody knows.

https://www.autoevolution.com/news/entire-crew-of-arrested-700-million-scheherazade-megαyacht-were-not-trained-professionals-189547.html

Each article is illustrated with individual photos of the philosopher, and individual photos of the president. There are no photos of Putin and Dugin together, because the two have never met.

The Russian state has a cool relationship with Dugin, whom they have used only occasionally when he can be useful. In 2014, the thinker’s Foundations of Geopolitics was introduced to the reading list of the Academy of the General Staff — but by the time Putin had decided against an outright annexation of the ‘People’s Republics’, Dugin’s brand of mystical expansionism was no longer helpful to the cause, and he swiftly fell out of what little favour and influence he had previously accuмulated.

By 2017, Dugin was openly critical of the president — in an interview that year, he derided Putin for holding an incoherent worldview: “I think that even he doesn’t understand what he’s saying because now he’s a liberal, now a conservative; now he’s for sovereignty, now for globalism, and now against globalism.”

If Dugin’s influence over Kremlin thought is minimal, his influence on their current war effort is nonexistent. Is Dugin supportive of the invasion? Absolutely. But to think he is dictating it — that it is happening at his will, or inspired by his writings — is absurd. Dugin’s hold over the actual workings and policy of the Kremlin is nonexistent, and claims that he operates as a Rasputin-type figure, dictating Putin’s foreign policy, are fantasies. Most Russians will not have heard of the thinker until his daughter was killed in front of him.

Dugin has gained far more traction in online, alt-right circles than he ever did as a mainstream Russian commentator, currently occupying a role more comparable to Nick Land than Henry Kissinger.