Meg, do you think this isn't a transparent attempt? How stupid do you think the readership of CathInfo is? Have you told the truth once in your entire life? Indeed, as a Russian partisan it only makes sense that you might lie constantly to keep in practice. If you had something useful to say you wouldn't need to resort to blatant dishonesty post after post. Keep lying, Meg.

What makes you such an absolute expert on all things relating to Putin and Russia, since you speak on little else? Why don't you seem to care as much about the Catholic Faith as you do the subject of Putin and Russia?

Anyone who disagrees with you is some sort of Russian operative. Do you realize that you are not quite right in the head, and that you need help?

At one point, Sean made a partly-tongue-in-cheek comment about dxcat40 being a fed, and he was all up in arms regarding the slander, but then regularly accuses individuals of being Russian operatives.

It's true that he seems to care very little about other subjects.

Most posters here, regardless of which "side" they're on can at least maintain a semblance of objectivity.  Nobody is canonizing Vlad Putin.  He's guilty at least of adultery, and probably has some blood on his hands as well (though certainly little of the propaganda can be believed).  He's also a schismatic, not a Catholic.  But if someone can't see that Russia is more aligned at least to the natural law than the West is, then he's got some blinders on.

Oh wow the same anklebiters lining up

And you have the temerity to talk about slander?  I have never once even remotely defended Communist China.  I was saying that the ploy was to focus on Russia and China as THE Communist enclaves in the world as a distraction from the fact that Communism was being rolled out in the West, a "look over there!" tactic, so that people will pay less attention to Communism insinuating itself throughout the West.  If you can't understand how this is not a defense of China, then you're beyond hopeless.

1. Yes, you don't have any credibility where slander is concerned. Someone need only look at some of the other active threads for examples.

2. No, one interpretation is that Russia and China are not the true perpetrators and that United States is the true source of Communism. If you meant to suggest the scissors strategy, that Russia and China are real Communist countries who are using internal traitors in the West then I might be able to agree with that assessment.

Seems as though you have a very feeble intellect, incapable of making simple distinctions.  You constantly engage in false dilemmas and false dichotomies, which is a favorite tactic (the Hegelian dialectic) employed by the Jєωιѕн overlords.

Unlike you, I can recognize that you aren't stupid. It's unfortunate that your intellect has been captured, but it is a typical problem with your SD. You don't provide any examples here, so I dismiss it all as ideologically-inspired nonsense on your part.

If someone praises Putin for rejecting the Western violation of natural law, this means that individual is a Russian operative shill who believes that Vlad Putin should be canonized.  False dilemmas then transition naturally into strawmen, where you attack this extreme position that no one actually holds.  For you, there's only 100% good and 100% evil, and nothing in between.

This itself is a strawman, because the ones I am aware of on the forum cite Putin's history and the history of Communists making use of traditional values and nationalism when they need to boost the nation against Capitalism, a la Stalin. The people praising Putin that you refer to here have a pattern of accepting whatever the popular idolization of Putin happens to be in the Russian and alternative media. Putin has a long, complicated history full of unknowns, and the arguments against him have nothing to do with what you are trying to sell here.

It's the same mindless buffoonery that the social engineers have used here in the US.  Republicans are 100% good and Democrats 100% evil, and vice versa, depending on which camp you were herded into.  This is what they use to get people to imbibe the globalist garbage that both parties are in cahoots on.  For you it's "US good, Russia bad" ... without any possibility of nuance.

This really hearkens back to your idea that Putin is learning and that Russia is progressing out of its brutal past while the West is degenerating into its error. You might believe it has something to do with Fatima and Russia beginning to reject the "errors of Russia" it previously held. Modern anticommunism has nothing to do with your analysis. The Anticommunism I am trying to communicate on the forum describes what they are doing as part of their long-term strategy and how none of it can be taken at face value.

Yes, Republicans and Democrats are both either compromised by or are actual Communists/Marxists. The Marxist web is a long, dark and complicated one. Again, your analysis here has nothing to do with any of that, but exists only in your imagination. It only shows your ignorance---not in the insulting way---and how you either simply don't know what you are talking about or are choosing to sell a bad story for propaganda purposes.

US was established on Masonic principles, and the Catholic monarchies of Europe have long been overthrown, and both the US and Europe have become essentially Communist.

The United States and Europe suffer from the different strains of ideas and social movements spawned from Western (aka Cultural) Marxism. Eastern Marxism has its own progression, but the two are linked together. Karl Marx claimed to be completing the ideas of the French Revolution, so there is no question about a sort of progression from what you describe here about Masons and the Fall of the Catholic Monarchies. It is all interconnected.

But the United States and Europe are not "essentially Communist." It is coming, but Russia and China have actual totalitarian states hearkening back to Marxism. Russia has many of the Soviet Communist structures still intact, despite the veneer of liberalization. China is an openly Communist country with the brutal and subtle methods of control on full display.

There was also the old "Communism bad, Capitalism good" dichotomy, where in point of fact there are problems with both systems, and both systems lead to the same end result, consolidation of power in the hands of various oligarchs and elites.

There is a true Left and a true Right. What you witness today are endless expressions of Leftism, with no voice allowed for the true Right. I wonder if you could identify it.

It was the legitimate evils of Capitalism that led to the oppressed masses getting behind the Communist revolution, and, conversely, the evils of Communism lead to individuals claiming that if you don't believe in unbridled Capitalism, "you're a Commie".  Jew mouthpiece Rush Limbaugh was a master at pushing that agenda.  Or, along the same lines, "Corporations good, unions bad.", "Corporations good, individuals abused by them bad."  So you show the same level of thinking as those mindless sheep who are manipulated by these Hegelian tactics.

What you don't know is that Marxists were behind and encouraged abuses of the system in order for the masses to rebel. The reality is that life in the West so good that the Marxists couldn't get the masses to rebel in the United States, Europe and many of places within their influence. It was outside of the West that Communism found a foothold, against the expectations of Marx and his followers.

It's a common error to make, but it is not surprising. Of course you push this narrative while comparing me to "mindless sheep."

tl;dr You are still incapable of describing my position despite how simple it actually is ("The Global ʝʊdɛօ-Communist movement is responsible"). You accuse me of exactly what you are guilty of doing, which is actually what Communists are trained to do (Stalin, infamously). It would be great if you could figure out what I am trying to say before "debunking it," but given past results, I expect you will continue to fall back on your old arguments and show no reaction to new information. Sad!

There is a true Left and a true Right. What you witness today are endless expressions of Leftism, with no voice allowed for the true Right. I wonder if you could identify it.

Does this "True Right" of your really exist? If so, then who are they? I'll bet that they aren't Catholic.

I'd also like to ask you about when the Russian Commies are going to invade the U.S., and take over. Since you are a self-professed expert on all things Russian, American, and communist, then surely you must know when they are going to invade.

Yes, I didn't invent it. No, I won't get into it here as far off-topic as we already have gotten, but perhaps I can share more on a different platform sometime. Yes, many of them are White Nationalists and non-Catholic, but there are also many Catholics represented.

Predicting the future is a dangerous business for mortals. We already have internal enemies working on taking over, as you know. I have not declared anything. I wrote previously in the thread that the window of opportunity lines up with Agenda 2030, so who knows what strange things we might see and hear in the days to come.

You don't want to get into the subject of your "True Right" on this forum, and yet you asked Ladislaus if he could identify them. Are you just trying to show how special and privileged you are, and how dumb we all are?

So you can't tell us when Putin is going to invade and take over the U.S. Then of what use is your brilliant expertise on the subject to us?